IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/infotm/v21y2020i3d10.1007_s10799-020-00316-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The more interactivity the better? Investigating interactivity, task complexity, and product knowledge in online purchase decisions

Author

Listed:
  • Fengchun Tang

    (Virginia Commonwealth University)

Abstract

This study examines the joint effects of interactivity, task complexity, and product knowledge on customers’ online purchase decision quality. Interactivity is defined as the extent to which users can participate in modifying the form and content of a mediated environment in real-time. For example, users sort products on a website based on certain criteria (e.g., price). An experiment with 264 participants was conducted to test the hypotheses. The results suggest that interactivity and task complexity jointly affect customers’ online purchase decision quality. When customers perform a complex task, interactivity reduces the cognitive resources needed to perform the task and thus improves customers’ decision quality. However, when customers perform a simple task, interactivity worsens the mismatch between the cognitive resources available and what is required, leading to deteriorated decision quality. Similarly, product knowledge and task complexity interact to influence customers’ decision quality. Product knowledge improves decision quality when customers perform a complex task, whereas it results in deteriorated decision quality when customers perform a simple task. In addition, interactivity interacts with product knowledge to affect customers’ intention to revisit the website. Specifically, interactivity has a stronger effect on customers’ intention to revisit the website when the customer has more product knowledge.

Suggested Citation

  • Fengchun Tang, 2020. "The more interactivity the better? Investigating interactivity, task complexity, and product knowledge in online purchase decisions," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 179-189, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:infotm:v:21:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1007_s10799-020-00316-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s10799-020-00316-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10799-020-00316-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10799-020-00316-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chuan-Hoo Tan & Hock-Hai Teo & Izak Benbasat, 2010. "Assessing Screening and Evaluation Decision Support Systems: A Resource-Matching Approach," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(2), pages 305-326, June.
    2. Zhenhui Jiang & Izak Benbasat, 2007. "Research Note---Investigating the Influence of the Functional Mechanisms of Online Product Presentations," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 18(4), pages 454-470, December.
    3. Swait, Joffre & Adamowicz, Wiktor, 2001. "The Influence of Task Complexity on Consumer Choice: A Latent Class Model of Decision Strategy Switching," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 28(1), pages 135-148, June.
    4. Cowley, Elizabeth & Mitchell, Andrew A, 2003. "The Moderating Effect of Product Knowledge on the Learning and Organization of Product Information," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 30(3), pages 443-454, December.
    5. Rao, Akshay R & Monroe, Kent B, 1988. "The Moderating Effect of Prior Knowledge on Cue Utilization in Product Evaluations," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 15(2), pages 253-264, September.
    6. Perracchio, Laura A & Meyers-Levy, Joan, 1997. "Evaluating Persuasion-Enhancing Techniques from a Resource-Matching Perspective," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 24(2), pages 178-191, September.
    7. Wood, Robert E., 1986. "Task complexity: Definition of the construct," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 60-82, February.
    8. Jingjun (David) Xu & Izak Benbasat & Ronald T. Cenfetelli, 2014. "Research Note ---The Influences of Online Service Technologies and Task Complexity on Efficiency and Personalization," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(2), pages 420-436, June.
    9. Yoo, Boonghee & Donthu, Naveen, 2001. "Developing and validating a multidimensional consumer-based brand equity scale," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 1-14, April.
    10. Gerald Häubl & Valerie Trifts, 2000. "Consumer Decision Making in Online Shopping Environments: The Effects of Interactive Decision Aids," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(1), pages 4-21, May.
    11. Fortin, David R. & Dholakia, Ruby Roy, 2005. "Interactivity and vividness effects on social presence and involvement with a web-based advertisement," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(3), pages 387-396, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carlos Orús & Raquel Gurrea & Carlos Flavián, 2017. "Facilitating imaginations through online product presentation videos: effects on imagery fluency, product attitude and purchase intention," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 661-700, December.
    2. Huang, Liqiang & Zhang, Jie & Liu, Yuan, 2017. "Antecedents of student MOOC revisit intention: Moderation effect of course difficulty," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 84-91.
    3. Nenycz-Thiel, Magda & Romaniuk, Jenni, 2016. "Understanding premium private labels: A consumer categorisation approach," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 22-30.
    4. Gökçe Esenduran & James A. Hill & In Joon Noh, 2020. "Understanding the Choice of Online Resale Channel for Used Electronics," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(5), pages 1188-1211, May.
    5. Shao, Wei & Lye, Ashley & Rundle-Thiele, Sharyn, 2009. "Different strokes for different folks: A method to accommodate decision -making heterogeneity," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 16(6), pages 495-501.
    6. Barney Tan & Cheng Yi & Hock C. Chan, 2015. "Research Note—Deliberation Without Attention: The Latent Benefits of Distracting Website Features for Online Purchase Decisions," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 26(2), pages 437-455, June.
    7. Aboubaker Ettis, Saïd, 2017. "Examining the relationships between online store atmospheric color, flow experience and consumer behavior," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 43-55.
    8. Ho, Xuan Huong & Nguyen, Dong Phong & Cheng, Julian Ming Sung & Le, Angelina Nhat Hanh, 2022. "Customer engagement in the context of retail mobile apps: A contingency model integrating spatial presence experience and its drivers," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    9. Zhang, Hong & Zhao, Ling & Gupta, Sumeet, 2018. "The role of online product recommendations on customer decision making and loyalty in social shopping communities," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 150-166.
    10. Wirawan Dony Dahana & HeeJae Shin & Sotaro Katsumata, 2018. "Influence of individual characteristics on whether and how much consumers engage in showrooming behavior," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 665-692, December.
    11. Erasmus, Alet C. & Donoghue, Suné & Dobbelstein, Thomas, 2014. "Consumers׳ perception of the complexity of selected household purchase decisions," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 293-305.
    12. Chuan-Hoo Tan & Hock-Hai Teo & Izak Benbasat, 2010. "Assessing Screening and Evaluation Decision Support Systems: A Resource-Matching Approach," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(2), pages 305-326, June.
    13. Cervi, Cleber & Brei, Vinicius Andrade, 2022. "Choice deferral: The interaction effects of visual boundaries and consumer knowledge," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    14. Suri, Rajneesh & Cai, Jane Zhen & Monroe, Kent B. & Thakor, Mrugank V., 2012. "Retailers’ Merchandise Organization and Price Perceptions," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 88(1), pages 168-179.
    15. Dutta, Sujay & Banerjee, Somak & Johnson, Aaron & Biswas, Abhijit, 2022. "Overcoming the challenge of low familiarity: Can a weakly familiar brand signal quality with exceptionally strong warranty?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 737-754.
    16. Wang, Yawei & Kang, Qi & Zhou, Shoujiang & Dong, Yuanyuan & Liu, Junqi, 2022. "The impact of service robots in retail: Exploring the effect of novelty priming on consumer behavior," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    17. Bo Xiao & Izak Benbasat, 2015. "Designing Warning Messages for Detecting Biased Online Product Recommendations: An Empirical Investigation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 26(4), pages 793-811, December.
    18. Wang, Qiuzhen & Cui, Xiling & Huang, Liqiang & Dai, Yiling, 2016. "Seller reputation or product presentation? An empirical investigation from cue utilization perspective," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 271-283.
    19. Yunhui Huang & Kai H. Lim & Zhijie Lin & Shunping Han, 2019. "Large Online Product Catalog Space Indicates High Store Price: Understanding Customers’ Overgeneralization and Illogical Inference," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(3), pages 963-979, September.
    20. Xu, Yingzi & Shieh, Chih-Hui & van Esch, Patrick & Ling, I-Ling, 2020. "AI customer service: Task complexity, problem-solving ability, and usage intention," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 189-199.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:infotm:v:21:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1007_s10799-020-00316-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.