IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/infosf/v3y2001i4d10.1023_a1012824820895.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Guidelines for Collaborative Supply Chain System Design and Operation

Author

Listed:
  • John A. Muckstadt

    (Cornell University)

  • David H. Murray

    (College of William & Mary)

  • James A. Rappold

    (University of Wisconsin)

  • Dwight E. Collins

    (Aspen Technology)

Abstract

Over the past decade, firms have adopted supply chain management as a critical element of their corporate strategies. Despite these efforts, it is our observation that many firms do not realize the anticipated benefits of constructing collaborative operating relationships with supply chain partners. Our purpose in this paper is to establish a set of guiding principles for the effective design and execution of supply chain systems. These principles suggest why, what, and how collaborative relationships should be constructed. While constructing and operating a competitive supply chain is the primary objective of supply chain management, we have observed several impediments to achieving this goal. First, demand uncertainty is so substantial in most supply chain environments that if it is not adequately addressed, it can severely degrade the anticipated performance of the supply chain as measured in terms of unit cost, speed, quality, and responsiveness to changing conditions. Second, supply chains with poor physical characteristics that operate with long and variable response times cannot take full advantage of collaborative relationships due to their inability to respond to changes in the environment. Third, firms with poor information infrastructures lack the capabilities necessary to acquire, store, manipulate, and transmit data effectively and quickly. Fourth, business processes are often not designed properly, both intra- and inter-organizationally, to adapt to evolving supply chain conditions. Finally, decision support systems and operating policies that guide day-to-day operating decisions may not be adequately designed to contend with supply chain uncertainty. We also suggest that the strategic and tactical modeling paradigms employed in supply chain decision support systems are inadequate in many operational environments because of the manner in which uncertainty is treated. Furthermore, collaborative relationships that focus on reducing the uncertainty in operating environments by employing improved information systems and business processes will result in more efficient allocation of key resources, faster response times to market forces, and more reliable supply chain performance; however, these collaborative arrangements by themselves cannot compensate for fundamentally flawed and operationally ineffective manufacturing and distribution environments.

Suggested Citation

  • John A. Muckstadt & David H. Murray & James A. Rappold & Dwight E. Collins, 2001. "Guidelines for Collaborative Supply Chain System Design and Operation," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 3(4), pages 427-453, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:3:y:2001:i:4:d:10.1023_a:1012824820895
    DOI: 10.1023/A:1012824820895
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1023/A:1012824820895
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1023/A:1012824820895?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fangruo Chen, 1998. "Echelon Reorder Points, Installation Reorder Points, and the Value of Centralized Demand Information," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(12-Part-2), pages 221-234, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Muckstadt, John A. & Klein, Michael G. & Jackson, Peter L. & Gougelet, Robert M. & Hupert, Nathaniel, 2023. "Efficient and effective large-scale vaccine distribution," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    2. Yamada, Tadashi & Imai, Koji & Nakamura, Takamasa & Taniguchi, Eiichi, 2011. "A supply chain-transport supernetwork equilibrium model with the behaviour of freight carriers," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(6), pages 887-907.
    3. Fatin Amrina A. Rashid & Hawa Hishamuddin & Nizaroyani Saibani & Mohd Radzi Abu Mansor & Zambri Harun, 2022. "A Review of Supply Chain Uncertainty Management in the End-of-Life Vehicle Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-28, October.
    4. Riemer, Kai, 2008. "E-Commerce und Supply-Chain-Management: Maßnahmen und Instrumente zur Verbesserung der Koordination in Lieferketten," Working Papers 53, University of Münster, Competence Center Internet Economy and Hybrid Systems, European Research Center for Information Systems (ERCIS).
    5. Weili Han & Yun Gu & Wei Wang & Yin Zhang & Yuliang Yin & Junyu Wang & Li-Rong Zheng, 2015. "The design of an electronic pedigree system for food safety," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 275-287, April.
    6. ur Rehman, Attique & Shakeel Sadiq Jajja, Muhammad & Farooq, Sami, 2022. "Manufacturing planning and control driven supply chain risk management: A dynamic capability perspective," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    7. Taiwo Adetiloye, 2021. "Collaboration Planning of Stakeholders for Sustainable City Logistics Operations," Papers 2107.14049, arXiv.org.
    8. Han, Jeong Hugh & Wang, Yingli & Naim, Mohamed, 2017. "Reconceptualization of information technology flexibility for supply chain management: An empirical study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 196-215.
    9. Gary L. Lilien & Arvind Rangaswamy & Gerrit H. Van Bruggen & Katrin Starke, 2004. "DSS Effectiveness in Marketing Resource Allocation Decisions: Reality vs. Perception," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 15(3), pages 216-235, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kevin H. Shang & Jing-Sheng Song & Paul H. Zipkin, 2009. "Coordination Mechanisms in Decentralized Serial Inventory Systems with Batch Ordering," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(4), pages 685-695, April.
    2. Kaijie Zhu & Ulrich W. Thonemann, 2004. "Modeling the Benefits of Sharing Future Demand Information," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(1), pages 136-147, February.
    3. Kevin H. Shang & Sean X. Zhou & Geert-Jan van Houtum, 2010. "Improving Supply Chain Performance: Real-Time Demand Information and Flexible Deliveries," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 12(3), pages 430-448, May.
    4. Sven Axsäter & Johan Marklund, 2008. "Optimal Position-Based Warehouse Ordering in Divergent Two-Echelon Inventory Systems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(4), pages 976-991, August.
    5. Vishal Gaur & Avi Giloni & Sridhar Seshadri, 2005. "Information Sharing in a Supply Chain Under ARMA Demand," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(6), pages 961-969, June.
    6. Juan Pedro Sepúlveda-Rojas & Rodrigo Ternero, 2020. "Analysis of the Value of Information and Coordination in a Dyadic Closed Loop Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-18, October.
    7. Caridi, Maria & Crippa, Luca & Perego, Alessandro & Sianesi, Andrea & Tumino, Angela, 2010. "Do virtuality and complexity affect supply chain visibility?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(2), pages 372-383, October.
    8. repec:dau:papers:123456789/522 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Gharaei, Abolfazl & Almehdawe, Eman, 2020. "Economic growing quantity," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    10. Xavier Brusset & Nico Temme, 2005. "Transport contract optimization under information asymmetry: an example," Econometrics 0512005, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Kevin H. Shang & Jing-Sheng Song, 2007. "Serial Supply Chains with Economies of Scale: Bounds and Approximations," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 55(5), pages 843-853, October.
    12. Son, Joong Y. & Sheu, Chwen, 2008. "The impact of replenishment policy deviations in a decentralized supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(2), pages 785-804, June.
    13. Sumon Sarkar & Bibhas C. Giri, 2022. "Safety stock management in a supply chain model with waiting time and price discount dependent backlogging rate in stochastic environment," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 917-946, April.
    14. Li, Xiaoming, 2010. "Optimal inventory policies in decentralized supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(1), pages 303-309, November.
    15. Hau L. Lee & V. Padmanabhan & Seungjin Whang, 2004. "Comments on "Information Distortion in a Supply Chain: The Bullwhip Effect"," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(12_supple), pages 1887-1893, December.
    16. Fangruo Chen, 1999. "Decentralized Supply Chains Subject to Information Delays," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(8), pages 1076-1090, August.
    17. Ding, Xiu-Hao & Huang, Rui-Hua, 2010. "Effects of knowledge spillover on inter-organizational resource sharing decision in collaborative knowledge creation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(3), pages 949-959, March.
    18. Arcan Nalca, & Tamer Boyaci, & Saibal Ray, 2017. "Consumer taste uncertainty in the context of store brand and national brand competition," ESMT Research Working Papers ESMT-17-01, ESMT European School of Management and Technology.
    19. Gérard P. Cachon & Marshall Fisher, 2000. "Supply Chain Inventory Management and the Value of Shared Information," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(8), pages 1032-1048, August.
    20. Canan Savaskan & Charles J. Corbett, 2001. "Contracting and Coordination in Closed-Loop Supply Chains," Discussion Papers 1327, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
    21. Subodha Kumar & Rakesh R. Mallipeddi, 2022. "Impact of cybersecurity on operations and supply chain management: Emerging trends and future research directions," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(12), pages 4488-4500, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:3:y:2001:i:4:d:10.1023_a:1012824820895. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.