IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i19p12573-d932269.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Review of Supply Chain Uncertainty Management in the End-of-Life Vehicle Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Fatin Amrina A. Rashid

    (Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Malaysia)

  • Hawa Hishamuddin

    (Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Malaysia
    Centre for Automotive Research, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Malaysia)

  • Nizaroyani Saibani

    (Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Malaysia
    Centre for Automotive Research, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Malaysia)

  • Mohd Radzi Abu Mansor

    (Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Malaysia
    Centre for Automotive Research, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Malaysia)

  • Zambri Harun

    (Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Malaysia
    Centre for Automotive Research, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Malaysia)

Abstract

Various uncertainties exist in the End-of-Life Vehicle (ELV) industry, which further complicates the ELV business’s growth. In order to pursue greater progress in the ELV business establishment, a comprehensive analysis of previous ELV studies with regard to the supply chain uncertainty perspective is essential. The objective of this study is aimed at categorising the existing supply chain uncertainty sources according to their end-of-life (EoL) strategies, identify the management approaches adopted to analyse the prominent research trends, and conduct a regional analysis of ELV supply chain studies for the past years, from 2016 until 2022. The content analysis method was used to extract all the essential information from previous research, and an analysis was performed to obtain the latest research trends and identify the relationship between the gathered data. The findings show that the past research focuses on three main supply chain uncertainties, namely, uncertainty in logistics and network facilities (31.8%), production and operations (30.7%), and environmental (25.0%). Furthermore, the regional analysis shows that 83% of the studies were conducted in developing countries over the past years. Lastly, several research gaps were presented to provide researchers with potential directions and the way forward to explore ELV supply chain research from the uncertainty management context.

Suggested Citation

  • Fatin Amrina A. Rashid & Hawa Hishamuddin & Nizaroyani Saibani & Mohd Radzi Abu Mansor & Zambri Harun, 2022. "A Review of Supply Chain Uncertainty Management in the End-of-Life Vehicle Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-28, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12573-:d:932269
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12573/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12573/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Junwei Gan & Li Luo, 2017. "Using DEMATEL and Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets to Identify Critical Factors Influencing the Recycling Rate of End-Of-Life Vehicles in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-22, October.
    2. T. V. Krishna Mohan & R. K. Amit, 2020. "Dismantlers’ dilemma in end-of-life vehicle recycling markets: a system dynamics model," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 290(1), pages 591-619, July.
    3. Muhammad Azmi & Akihiro Tokai, 2017. "Electric vehicle and end-of-life vehicle estimation in Malaysia 2040," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 37(4), pages 451-464, December.
    4. Rohit Agrawal & Vishal A. Wankhede & Anil Kumar & Sunil Luthra, 2021. "Analysing the roadblocks of circular economy adoption in the automobile sector: Reducing waste and environmental perspectives," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 1051-1066, February.
    5. Samira Keivanpour & Daoud Ait-Kadi & Christian Mascle, 2017. "Automobile manufacturers’ strategic choice in applying green practices: joint application of evolutionary game theory and fuzzy rule-based approach," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(5), pages 1312-1335, March.
    6. Li, Lin & Dababneh, Fadwa & Zhao, Jing, 2018. "Cost-effective supply chain for electric vehicle battery remanufacturing," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 277-286.
    7. Govindan, Kannan & Kadziński, Miłosz & Ehling, Ronja & Miebs, Grzegorz, 2019. "Selection of a sustainable third-party reverse logistics provider based on the robustness analysis of an outranking graph kernel conducted with ELECTRE I and SMAA," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 1-15.
    8. Fuli Zhou & Yun Lin & Xu Wang & Lin Zhou & Yandong He, 2016. "ELV Recycling Service Provider Selection Using the Hybrid MCDM Method: A Case Application in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-22, May.
    9. Yang Li & Shiyu Huang & Yanhui Liu & Yiyi Ju, 2021. "Recycling Potential of Plastic Resources from End-of-Life Passenger Vehicles in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-15, September.
    10. Awudu, Iddrisu & Zhang, Jun, 2012. "Uncertainties and sustainability concepts in biofuel supply chain management: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 1359-1368.
    11. John A. Muckstadt & David H. Murray & James A. Rappold & Dwight E. Collins, 2001. "Guidelines for Collaborative Supply Chain System Design and Operation," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 3(4), pages 427-453, December.
    12. Shankar, Ravi & Bhattacharyya, Shisam & Choudhary, Alok, 2018. "A decision model for a strategic closed-loop supply chain to reclaim End-of-Life Vehicles," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 273-286.
    13. Simic, Vladimir, 2016. "End-of-life vehicles allocation management under multiple uncertainties: An interval-parameter two-stage stochastic full-infinite programming approach," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1-17.
    14. Solange Ayuni Numfor & Geoffrey Barongo Omosa & Zhengyang Zhang & Kazuyo Matsubae, 2021. "A Review of Challenges and Opportunities for End-of-Life Vehicle Recycling in Developing Countries and Emerging Economies: A SWOT Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-24, April.
    15. Kent D Miller, 1992. "A Framework for Integrated Risk Management in International Business," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 23(2), pages 311-331, June.
    16. Terry P. Harrison, 2001. "Global Supply Chain Design," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 3(4), pages 413-416, December.
    17. Jeihoonian, Mohammad & Kazemi Zanjani, Masoumeh & Gendreau, Michel, 2017. "Closed-loop supply chain network design under uncertain quality status: Case of durable products," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PB), pages 470-486.
    18. Syed Abdul Rehman Khan & Danish Iqbal Godil & George Thomas & Muhammad Tanveer & Hafiz Muhammad Zia-ul-haq & Haider Mahmood, 2021. "The Decision-Making Analysis on End-of-Life Vehicle Recycling and Remanufacturing under Extended Producer Responsibility Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-14, October.
    19. Jianan Sun & Zhongdong Xiao, 2018. "Channel selection for automotive parts remanufacturer under government replacement-subsidy," European Journal of Industrial Engineering, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(6), pages 808-831.
    20. Ene, Seval & Öztürk, Nursel, 2017. "Grey modelling based forecasting system for return flow of end-of-life vehicles," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 155-166.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Meiling He & Tianhe Lin & Xiaohui Wu & Jianqiang Luo & Yongtao Peng, 2020. "A Systematic Literature Review of Reverse Logistics of End-of-Life Vehicles: Bibliometric Analysis and Research Trend," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-22, October.
    2. Sung Hoon Chung & Robert D. Weaver & Hyun Woo Jeon, 2020. "Sustainable Management of Remanufacturing in Dynamic Supply Chains," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 703-731, September.
    3. Sitinjak, Charli & Simic, Vladimir & Ismail, Rozmi & Musselwhite, Charles & Bacanin, Nebojsa, 2024. "Psychometric components of the social acceptance toward end-of-life vehicles policy: A case study of Indonesia," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 206-218.
    4. Luttiely Santos Oliveira & Ricardo Luiz Machado, 2021. "Application of optimization methods in the closed-loop supply chain: a literature review," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 41(2), pages 357-400, February.
    5. Geoffrey Barongo Omosa & Solange Ayuni Numfor & Monika Kosacka-Olejnik, 2023. "Modeling a Reverse Logistics Supply Chain for End-of-Life Vehicle Recycling Risk Management: A Fuzzy Risk Analysis Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-19, January.
    6. D'Adamo, Idiano & Gastaldi, Massimo & Rosa, Paolo, 2020. "Recycling of end-of-life vehicles: Assessing trends and performances in Europe," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    7. Jiao Wang & Lima Zhao & Arnd Huchzermeier, 2021. "Operations‐Finance Interface in Risk Management: Research Evolution and Opportunities," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(2), pages 355-389, February.
    8. Efthymios Rodias & Remigio Berruto & Dionysis Bochtis & Alessandro Sopegno & Patrizia Busato, 2019. "Green, Yellow, and Woody Biomass Supply-Chain Management: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-22, August.
    9. Wang, Zheng-Xin & Jv, Yue-Qi, 2021. "A non-linear systematic grey model for forecasting the industrial economy-energy-environment system," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    10. Desbordes, Rodolphe, 2007. "The sensitivity of U.S. multinational enterprises to political and macroeconomic uncertainty: A sectoral analysis," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 16(6), pages 732-750, December.
    11. Anthony Goerzen & Stephen Sapp & Andrew Delios, 2010. "Investor Response to Environmental Risk in Foreign Direct Investment," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 50(6), pages 683-708, December.
    12. Alkaraan, Fadi & Elmarzouky, Mahmoud & Hussainey, Khaled & Venkatesh, V.G., 2023. "Sustainable strategic investment decision-making practices in UK companies: The influence of governance mechanisms on synergy between industry 4.0 and circular economy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    13. Zhiguo Wang & Lufei Huang & Cici Xiao He, 2021. "A multi-objective and multi-period optimization model for urban healthcare waste’s reverse logistics network design," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 42(4), pages 785-812, November.
    14. Ahmed, Zafar U. & Mohamad, Osman & Tan, Brian & Johnson, James P., 2002. "International risk perceptions and mode of entry: a case study of Malaysian multinational firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 55(10), pages 805-813, October.
    15. Ba, Birome Holo & Prins, Christian & Prodhon, Caroline, 2016. "Models for optimization and performance evaluation of biomass supply chains: An Operations Research perspective," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(P2), pages 977-989.
    16. Zhanwei Tian & Guoqing Zhang, 2021. "Multi-echelon fulfillment warehouse rent and production allocation for online direct selling," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 304(1), pages 427-451, September.
    17. Marcela Tuzová & Martina Toulová & Lea Kubíčková, 2017. "The Specifics of the Internationalization Process of Czech SMEs in the Food Industry," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 65(3), pages 1055-1064.
    18. Tuğba Yeğin & Muhammad Ikram, 2022. "Analysis of Consumers’ Electric Vehicle Purchase Intentions: An Expansion of the Theory of Planned Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-27, September.
    19. Longinidis, Pantelis & Georgiadis, Michael C., 2014. "Integration of sale and leaseback in the optimal design of supply chain networks," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 73-89.
    20. Chia-Nan Wang & Ngoc-Ai-Thy Nguyen & Thanh-Tuan Dang & Chen-Ming Lu, 2021. "A Compromised Decision-Making Approach to Third-Party Logistics Selection in Sustainable Supply Chain Using Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy VIKOR Methods," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-27, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12573-:d:932269. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.