IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/infosf/v15y2013i5d10.1007_s10796-013-9418-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding the beliefs, actions and outcomes of sustainability reporting: An experimental approach

Author

Listed:
  • Matthias Gräuler

    (University of Osnabrück)

  • Michael Freundlieb

    (University of Osnabrück)

  • Kerstin Ortwerth

    (University of Osnabrück)

  • Frank Teuteberg

    (University of Osnabrück)

Abstract

IS researchers have identified substantial research gaps within the IS community regarding sustainability. Therefore, this paper pursues an experimental approach to investigate online sustainability reports (SRs) which are a common instrument for corporate sustainability communication. The applied research approach examines not only which properties of SRs enhance the readers’ willingness to read a SR, but also to what extent SRs can influence the readers’ actions and impact corporate image. Within the course of this paper, a belief-action-outcome (BAO) model and a corresponding experimental design, which examines SRs in three phases (i.e. before reading, during reading and after reading), are developed and conducted; subsequently the results are empirically analysed. Finally, implications for practitioners and researchers in the field of sustainability and especially sustainability reporting are demonstrated. Furthermore, possible starting points for future research are discussed. The results indicate that a sophisticated SR that satisfies the readers’ expectations has a significant impact on corporate image and the readers’ actions (i.e. buying and recommending products, investing and considering to work for the reporting company), which qualifies sustainability reporting as an important channel for corporate communication.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthias Gräuler & Michael Freundlieb & Kerstin Ortwerth & Frank Teuteberg, 2013. "Understanding the beliefs, actions and outcomes of sustainability reporting: An experimental approach," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 15(5), pages 779-797, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:15:y:2013:i:5:d:10.1007_s10796-013-9418-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s10796-013-9418-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10796-013-9418-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10796-013-9418-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kai H. Lim & Lawrence M. Ward & Izak Benbasat, 1997. "An Empirical Study of Computer System Learning: Comparison of Co-Discovery and Self-Discovery Methods," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 8(3), pages 254-272, September.
    2. Joey F. George & George K. Easton & J. F. Nunamaker & Gregory B. Northcraft, 1990. "A Study of Collaborative Group Work With and Without Computer-Based Support," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 1(4), pages 394-415, December.
    3. Dale L. Goodhue, 1995. "Understanding User Evaluations of Information Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(12), pages 1827-1844, December.
    4. Henry Kaiser, 1958. "The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 23(3), pages 187-200, September.
    5. Vicki McKinney & Kanghyun Yoon & Fatemeh “Mariam” Zahedi, 2002. "The Measurement of Web-Customer Satisfaction: An Expectation and Disconfirmation Approach," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 296-315, September.
    6. D. Harrison McKnight & Vivek Choudhury & Charles Kacmar, 2002. "Developing and Validating Trust Measures for e-Commerce: An Integrative Typology," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 334-359, September.
    7. Viswanath Venkatesh & Fred D. Davis, 2000. "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 186-204, February.
    8. Iris Vessey & Dennis Galletta, 1991. "Cognitive Fit: An Empirical Study of Information Acquisition," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 2(1), pages 63-84, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Joseph Sarkis & Chulmo Koo & Richard T. Watson, 2013. "Green information systems & technologies – this generation and beyond: Introduction to the special issue," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 15(5), pages 695-704, November.
    2. Emmanuel W. Ayaburi & Jaeung Lee & Michele Maasberg, 2020. "Understanding Crowdsourcing Contest Fitness Strategic Decision Factors and Performance: An Expectation-Confirmation Theory Perspective," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 1227-1240, October.
    3. Emmanuel W. Ayaburi & Jaeung Lee & Michele Maasberg, 0. "Understanding Crowdsourcing Contest Fitness Strategic Decision Factors and Performance: An Expectation-Confirmation Theory Perspective," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-14.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dan J. Kim & Donald L. Ferrin & H. Raghav Rao, 2009. "Trust and Satisfaction, Two Stepping Stones for Successful E-Commerce Relationships: A Longitudinal Exploration," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 20(2), pages 237-257, June.
    2. Andreas I. Nicolaou & D. Harrison McKnight, 2006. "Perceived Information Quality in Data Exchanges: Effects on Risk, Trust, and Intention to Use," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 17(4), pages 332-351, December.
    3. Tim-Benjamin Lembcke & Mathias Willnat & Henrik Lechte & Maike Greve & Julia Heinsohn & Alfred Benedikt Brendel, 2021. "Mobility Need-Adaptive Housing Platforms: The Benefit of a Commute Time Search Feature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-14, March.
    4. Wen-Lung Shiau & Yogesh K. Dwivedi, 2013. "Citation and co-citation analysis to identify core and emerging knowledge in electronic commerce research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 94(3), pages 1317-1337, March.
    5. Younès Boughzala & Inès Bouzid & Imed Boughzala, 2012. "Les déterminants de l'adoption de l'e-achat public en France : une étude qualitative auprès des praticiens," Post-Print hal-02408949, HAL.
    6. Shahbaz, Muhammad & Gao, Changyuan & Zhai, LiLi & Shahzad, Fakhar & Khan, Imran, 2021. "Environmental air pollution management system: Predicting user adoption behavior of big data analytics," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    7. Deli Yuan & Muhammad Khalilur Rahman & Md. Abu Issa Gazi & Md. Atikur Rahaman & Mohammad Mainul Hossain & Shaharin Akter, 2021. "Analyzing of User Attitudes Toward Intention to Use Social Media for Learning," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, November.
    8. Yadgar Taha M. Hamakhan, 2020. "The effect of individual factors on user behaviour and the moderating role of trust: an empirical investigation of consumers’ acceptance of electronic banking in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 6(1), pages 1-29, December.
    9. Nasser Hamidi & Tahmineh Torabi Rad & Alireza Jahany, 2012. "Evaluation Of Factors Influencing Tendency Towards E- Banking In Bank Customers," Far East Journal of Marketing and Management, Far East Research Centre, vol. 2(3), pages 25-42, August.
    10. John D'Ambra & Concepción S. Wilson & Shahriar Akter, 2013. "Application of the task-technology fit model to structure and evaluate the adoption of E-books by Academics," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 64(1), pages 48-64, January.
    11. Kim, Juran & Lee, Ki Hoon, 2019. "Influence of integration on interactivity in social media luxury brand communities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 422-429.
    12. Her-Sen Doong & Hsiangchu Lai, 2008. "Exploring usage continuance of e-negotiation systems: expectation and disconfirmation approach," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 111-126, March.
    13. Dahlberg, Tomi & Öörni, Anssi, 2006. "Finnish consumers' expectations on developments and changes in payment habits : survey in connection with the research project "Finnish payment habits 2010"," Research Discussion Papers 32/2006, Bank of Finland.
    14. Christine Rzepka & Benedikt Berger & Thomas Hess, 2022. "Voice Assistant vs. Chatbot – Examining the Fit Between Conversational Agents’ Interaction Modalities and Information Search Tasks," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 839-856, June.
    15. Sang Soo Kim, 2020. "Purchase Intention in the Online Open Market: Do Concerns for E-Commerce Really Matter?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-21, January.
    16. Quaglione, Davide & Crociata, Alessandro & Agovino, Massimiliano & Iaia, Lea, 2020. "Cultural capital and online purchase of tourism services," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    17. Avornyo, Philip & Fang, Jiaming & Antwi, Collins Opoku & Aboagye, Michael Osei & Boadi, Evans Asante, 2019. "Are customers still with us? The influence of optimum stimulation level and IT-specific traits on mobile banking discontinuous usage intentions," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 348-360.
    18. Faridi, Amir Ali & Kavoosi-Kalashami, Mohammad & Bilali, Hamid El, 2020. "Attitude components affecting adoption of soil and water conservation measures by paddy farmers in Rasht County, Northern Iran," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    19. Amaro, Suzanne & Duarte, Paulo, 2015. "An integrative model of consumers' intentions to purchase travel online," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 64-79.
    20. Viswanath Venkatesh & James Y. L. Thong & Frank K. Y. Chan & Paul J. H. Hu, 2016. "Managing Citizens’ Uncertainty in E-Government Services: The Mediating and Moderating Roles of Transparency and Trust," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(1), pages 87-111, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:15:y:2013:i:5:d:10.1007_s10796-013-9418-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.