Author
Listed:
- Iris Vessey
(Department of Accounting and MIS, College of Business Administration, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802)
- Dennis Galletta
(Katz Graduate School of Business, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260)
Abstract
From a broad perspective, our research can be viewed as investigating the fit of technology to task, the user's view of the fit between technology and task, and the relative importance of each to problem-solving or decision-making performance.The technology investigated in this research is the mode of information presentation. Although there has been a considerable amount of research into problem solving using graphs and tables, until recently the circumstances in which each is more effective have been largely unresolved. Recent research has suggested that performance benefits accrue when cognitive fit occurs, i.e., when factors such as the problem representation and problem solving tools match the characteristics of the task. In this paper, we investigate the effects of the basic paradigm of cognitive fit and extensions to the paradigm in a laboratory experiment that examined the nature of subjects' mental representations as well as problem-solving performance. The experiment, using 128 MBA students in two identical, repeated measures designs, produced the following results:• Performance improved markedly for symbolic tasks when the problem representation matched the task.Performance effects also resulted from matching specific problem-solving skills to the problem representation and the task, and to a lesser extent when the skills matched the task alone.• The incremental effects of matching skills to the problem representation and/or the task were small compared with the primary effects of cognitive fit-that of matching problem representation to task.• A large proportion of problem solvers have insight into the concept of supporting tasks with certain types of problem representation and vice versa.• Participants preferred to use tables rather than graphs; they also preferred to solve symbolic rather than spatial problems.Finally, the problem representation more significantly influenced the mental representation than did task conceptualization.This research suggests that providing decision support systems to satisfy individual managers' desires will not have a large effect on either the efficiency or the effectiveness of problem solving. Designers should, instead, concentrate on determining the characteristics of the tasks that problem solvers must address, and on supporting those tasks with the appropriate problem representations and support tools. Sufficient evidence now exists to suggest that the notion of cognitive fit may be one aspect of a general theory of problem solving. Suggestions are made for extending the notion of fit to more complex problem-solving environments.
Suggested Citation
Iris Vessey & Dennis Galletta, 1991.
"Cognitive Fit: An Empirical Study of Information Acquisition,"
Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 2(1), pages 63-84, March.
Handle:
RePEc:inm:orisre:v:2:y:1991:i:1:p:63-84
DOI: 10.1287/isre.2.1.63
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orisre:v:2:y:1991:i:1:p:63-84. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.