IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ijsaem/v13y2022i2d10.1007_s13198-021-01364-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Genetic algorithm in retrial queueing system with server breakdown and caller intolerance with voluntary service

Author

Listed:
  • Mridula Jain

    (Manipal University Jaipur)

  • Anamika Jain

    (Manipal University Jaipur)

Abstract

The paper investigates the M/M/s retrial queueing system with servers prone to breakdown and with voluntary service. During a phone call, if the caller finds a free call line, then it connects immediately to the call agent, considered as server. Those who finds the call busy either join the orbit for retrial or disconnect the call. After receiving the essential service either caller leaves the system or requests for voluntary service. The miniature used in the queueing system employs a quasi-birth-and-death process. The stationary probabilities are derived using matrix-analytic approach and then performance measures are calculated using these stationary probabilities. The impact of system parameters on performance measures is illustrated using graphs and tables. Total system cost is calculated as a function of orbit capacity, repair rate of breakdown and two different service rates. The optimization methodology is demonstrated using various cases. Further the Genetic algorithm is used to find the optimum value of both essential and optional service rates, rate of breakdown and orbit capacity to minimize the overall cost. The study of consistency of retrial queue with server prone to breakdowns and repairs is of great significance because of inadequate capability of repairs and strong impact of the breakdowns on the performance measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Mridula Jain & Anamika Jain, 2022. "Genetic algorithm in retrial queueing system with server breakdown and caller intolerance with voluntary service," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 13(2), pages 582-598, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:13:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s13198-021-01364-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s13198-021-01364-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13198-021-01364-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13198-021-01364-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dudin, A.N. & Dudin, S.A. & Dudina, O.S. & Samouylov, K.E., 2020. "Competitive queueing systems with comparative rating dependent arrivals," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 7(C).
    2. Chakravarthy, Srinivas R. & Shruti, & Kulshrestha, Rakhee, 2020. "A queueing model with server breakdowns, repairs, vacations, and backup server," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 7(C).
    3. Falin, G. I. & Artalejo, J. R., 1998. "A finite source retrial queue," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 108(2), pages 409-424, July.
    4. Dimitriou, Ioannis, 2018. "A two-class queueing system with constant retrial policy and general class dependent service times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 270(3), pages 1063-1073.
    5. Jau-Chuan Ke & Chia-Huang Wu & Wen Lea Pearn, 2011. "Multi-server retrial queue with second optional service: algorithmic computation and optimisation," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(10), pages 1755-1769.
    6. Meena, Rakesh Kumar & Jain, Madhu & Sanga, Sudeep Singh & Assad, Assif, 2019. "Fuzzy modeling and harmony search optimization for machining system with general repair, standby support and vacation," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 361(C), pages 858-873.
    7. Cheng-Dar Liou, 2015. "Markovian queue optimisation analysis with an unreliable server subject to working breakdowns and impatient customers," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(12), pages 2165-2182, September.
    8. Madhu Jain & Chandra Shekhar & Rakesh Kumar Meena, 2019. "Performance analysis and control F-policy for fault-tolerant system with working vacation," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 56(2), pages 409-431, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Azizi, Fariba & Salari, Nooshin, 2023. "A novel condition-based maintenance framework for parallel manufacturing systems based on bivariate birth/birth–death processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    2. Srinivas R. Chakravarthy & Alexander N. Dudin & Sergey A. Dudin & Olga S. Dudina, 2023. "Queueing System with Potential for Recruiting Secondary Servers," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-24, January.
    3. Anatoly Nazarov & János Sztrik & Anna Kvach & Ádám Tóth, 2020. "Asymptotic sojourn time analysis of finite-source M/M/1 retrial queueing system with collisions and server subject to breakdowns and repairs," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 288(1), pages 417-434, May.
    4. Haque, Lani & Armstrong, Michael J., 2007. "A survey of the machine interference problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 179(2), pages 469-482, June.
    5. Alexander Dudin & Olga Dudina & Sergei Dudin & Yulia Gaidamaka, 2022. "Self-Service System with Rating Dependent Arrivals," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-21, January.
    6. I. Padmavathi & A. Shophia Lawrence & B. Sivakumar, 2016. "A finite-source inventory system with postponed demands and modified M vacation policy," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 53(1), pages 41-62, March.
    7. Shekhar, Chandra & Kumar, Amit & Varshney, Shreekant, 2020. "Load sharing redundant repairable systems with switching and reboot delay," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    8. Anatoly Nazarov & János Sztrik & Anna Kvach & Ádám Tóth, 2022. "Asymptotic Analysis of Finite-Source M/GI/1 Retrial Queueing Systems with Collisions and Server Subject to Breakdowns and Repairs," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 1503-1518, September.
    9. Gheisariha, Elmira & Tavana, Madjid & Jolai, Fariborz & Rabiee, Meysam, 2021. "A simulation–optimization model for solving flexible flow shop scheduling problems with rework and transportation," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 152-178.
    10. Miaomiao Yu & Yinghui Tang, 2022. "Analysis of a renewal batch arrival queue with a fault-tolerant server using shift operator method," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 2831-2858, July.
    11. Lyes Ikhlef & Ouiza Lekadir & Djamil Aïssani, 2016. "MRSPN analysis of Semi-Markovian finite source retrial queues," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 247(1), pages 141-167, December.
    12. Soheil Azizi & Milad Mohammadi, 2023. "Strategy selection for multi-objective redundancy allocation problem in a k-out-of-n system considering the mean time to failure," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 60(2), pages 1021-1044, June.
    13. Lan Shaojun & Tang Yinghui, 2017. "Performance Analysis of a Discrete-Time Queue with Working Breakdowns and Searching for the Optimum Service Rate in Working Breakdown Period," Journal of Systems Science and Information, De Gruyter, vol. 5(2), pages 176-192, April.
    14. Dieter Fiems & Tuan Phung-Duc, 2019. "Light-traffic analysis of random access systems without collisions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 277(2), pages 311-327, June.
    15. Mohammad Nasir & Ali Sadollah & Przemyslaw Grzegorzewski & Jin Hee Yoon & Zong Woo Geem, 2021. "Harmony Search Algorithm and Fuzzy Logic Theory: An Extensive Review from Theory to Applications," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(21), pages 1-46, October.
    16. Seokjun Lee & Sergei Dudin & Olga Dudina & Chesoong Kim & Valentina Klimenok, 2020. "A Priority Queue with Many Customer Types, Correlated Arrivals and Changing Priorities," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-20, August.
    17. B. Krishna Kumar & A. Thanikachalam & V. Kanakasabapathi & R. Rukmani, 2016. "Performance analysis of a multiprogramming–multiprocessor retrial queueing system with orderly reattempts," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 247(1), pages 319-364, December.
    18. Shengli Lv, 2021. "Multi-Machine Repairable System with One Unreliable Server and Variable Repair Rate," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-16, June.
    19. Rani, Shobha & Jain, Madhu & Meena, Rakesh Kumar, 2023. "Queueing modeling and optimization of a fault-tolerant system with reboot, recovery, and vacationing server operating under admission control policy," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 408-425.
    20. Cui, Ligang & Deng, Jie & Liu, Rui & Xu, Dongyang & Zhang, Yajun & Xu, Maozeng, 2020. "A stochastic multi-item replenishment and delivery problem with lead-time reduction initiatives and the solving methodologies," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 374(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:13:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s13198-021-01364-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.