IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ijphth/v65y2020i9d10.1007_s00038-020-01515-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predictors of uptake of cervical cancer screening among women in Urban Tanzania: community-based cross-sectional study

Author

Listed:
  • Joanes Faustine Mboineki

    (Zhengzhou University
    The University of Dodoma)

  • Panpan Wang

    (Zhengzhou University)

  • Kamala Dhakal

    (Zhengzhou University)

  • Mikiyas Amare Getu

    (Zhengzhou University)

  • Walter Cleophance Millanzi

    (The University of Dodoma)

  • Changying Chen

    (The first affiliated hospital of Zhengzhou University)

Abstract

Objectives The proportion of women screened for cervical cancer in Tanzania remains small at 6–21%. Even though some studies have been conducted to address barriers, the screening uptake remains low, which denotes the presence of unidentified barriers. The main objective of this study is to assess the predictors in the uptake of cervical cancer screening (CCS) among women in Tanzania. Methods This is a community-based cross-sectional study conducted to obtain quantitative data through validated questionnaires to assess predictors of CCS. Results 1013 (91.8%) of the respondents had not been screened for cervical cancer. Three predictors of CCS were identified in this study; screening intention, health beliefs, and knowledge level. 600 (54.4%) of respondents had no screening intention. 552 (50%) had negative health beliefs, and 585 (53%) had inadequate knowledge of cervical cancer and CCS. Respondents who had no intention to screen were 0.482 (AOR) times less likely to uptake CCS (P = 0.002; 95% CI: 0.305, 0.761). Conclusions The ongoing community-awareness raising campaigns should be coupled with community knowledge-raising campaign, and there should be an establishing of peer-supporting screening programs in communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Joanes Faustine Mboineki & Panpan Wang & Kamala Dhakal & Mikiyas Amare Getu & Walter Cleophance Millanzi & Changying Chen, 2020. "Predictors of uptake of cervical cancer screening among women in Urban Tanzania: community-based cross-sectional study," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 65(9), pages 1593-1602, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:ijphth:v:65:y:2020:i:9:d:10.1007_s00038-020-01515-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s00038-020-01515-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00038-020-01515-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00038-020-01515-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Howard White & Shagun Sabarwal, 2014. "Quasi-Experimental Design and Methods: Methodological Briefs - Impact Evaluation No. 8," Papers innpub753, Methodological Briefs.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Melinda Chelva & Sanchit Kaushal & Nicola West & Erica Erwin & Safina Yuma & Jessica Sleeth & Khadija I. Yahya-Malima & Donna Shelley & Isabelle Risso-Gill & Karen Yeates, 2024. "“In the Village That She Comes from, Most of the People Don’t Know Anything about Cervical Cancer”: A Health Systems Appraisal of Cervical Cancer Prevention Services in Tanzania," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(8), pages 1-19, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lucia Švábová & Katarína Kramárová & Marek Ďurica, 2021. "Evaluation of the Effects of the Graduate Practice in Slovakia: Comparison of Results of Counterfactual Methods," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2021(4), pages 1-31.
    2. Richardson, Eugene T. & Kelly, J. Daniel & Sesay, Osman & Drasher, Michael D. & Desai, Ishaan K. & Frankfurter, Raphael & Farmer, Paul E. & Barrie, Mohamed Bailor, 2017. "The symbolic violence of ‘outbreak’: A mixed methods, quasi-experimental impact evaluation of social protection on Ebola survivor wellbeing," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 77-82.
    3. McGuire, Joel & Kaiser, Caspar & Bach-Mortensen, Anders, 2020. "The impact of cash transfers on subjective well-being and mental health in low- and middle- income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis," SocArXiv ydr54, Center for Open Science.
    4. Cheryll Adviento-Rodulfa & May Rhea S. Lopez, 2022. "Paired Reading Strategy and Comprehension Level Among Grade 10 Students," World Journal of English Language, Sciedu Press, vol. 12(1), pages 104-104, December.
    5. Wei-Long Wu & Yen Hsu & Qi-Fan Yang & Jiang-Jie Chen, 2021. "A Spherical Video-Based Immersive Virtual Reality Learning System to Support Landscape Architecture Students’ Learning Performance during the COVID-19 Era," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-23, May.
    6. Ruichuan Yu & Camila Perera & Manasi Sharma & Alessandra Ipince & Shivit Bakrania & Farhad Shokraneh & Juan Sebastian Mosquera Sepulveda & David Anthony, 2023. "Child and adolescent mental health and psychosocial support interventions: An evidence and gap map of low‐ and middle‐income countries," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(3), September.
    7. Kahuina Miller & Tetsuro Hyodo, 2021. "Impact of the Panama Canal expansion on Latin American and Caribbean ports: difference in difference (DID) method," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-23, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ijphth:v:65:y:2020:i:9:d:10.1007_s00038-020-01515-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.