IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ieaple/v22y2022i2d10.1007_s10784-022-09572-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lessons learnt from two decades of international environmental agreements: law

Author

Listed:
  • Peter H. Sand

    (University of Munich)

  • Jeffrey McGee

    (University of Tasmania)

Abstract

As Patricia Birnie cautiously and prophetically put it in the inaugural issue of this journal (INEA 1, January 2001, p. 74), “we do not know whether States and the tentative regimes they have so far established can withstand the pressures of globalization of trade and degradation and over-exploitation generated by advances in technologies for locating, fertilizing, harvesting, processing and modifying natural resources and biodiversity. This is truly terra incognita in which such seeds of destruction may already be implanted.” Among the 600 or so papers and reviews published in INEA from 2001 to 2020, more than 70 deal wholly or partly with legal aspects of environmental problems and the international dimensions of environmental justice. While the main focus of INEA has been on issues of public international (inter-state) law, there have also been important inputs drawn from comparative legal analysis (of national legislation and judicial decisions) and from “transnational administrative law” that influence the effectiveness of multilateral treaties and their associated international institutions. Novel concepts and practices emerging from the environmental field (such as recourse to a range of “soft law” principles; flexible delegated standard-setting in the face of global change; and equitable differentiation of compliance duties) have inspired developments in related areas of contemporary international law-making and law-applying. At the same time, the very proliferation of multilateral and bilateral environmental instruments raised new questions and expressions of alarm over “treaty congestion” and “fragmentation” within the international law system. It is not the intention of this paper to explore the general interaction of international environmental law with neighboring disciplines such as international economic law or human rights law, but simply to record the “seismographic” impact of INEA on legal-intellectual discourse over these past two decades. To some extent, the role of the Journal in identifying both new prospects and new risks in this field could indeed be likened to that of a “canary in the coal-mine.” The lessons so learnt may thus offer new insights to help in averting the destruction which Birnie visualized, and to advance inter-generationally and intra- generationally shared values of environmental justice.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter H. Sand & Jeffrey McGee, 2022. "Lessons learnt from two decades of international environmental agreements: law," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 263-278, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:ieaple:v:22:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s10784-022-09572-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s10784-022-09572-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10784-022-09572-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10784-022-09572-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Steinar Andresen & Ellen Hey, 2005. "The Effectiveness and Legitimacy of International Environmental Institutions," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 5(3), pages 211-226, September.
    2. Gurdial Nijar, 2013. "The Nagoya–Kuala Lumpur Supplementary Protocol on Liability and Redress to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety: An analysis and implementation challenges," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 271-290, September.
    3. Nupur Chowdhury & Santanu Sabhapandit, 2007. "The legal regime for application of the precautionary principle in India: future directions for the GM regulatory regime," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 7(3), pages 281-300, September.
    4. Frank Jaspers, 2001. "The New Water Legislation of Zimbabwe and South Africa – Comparison of Legal and Institutional Reform," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 1(3), pages 305-325, July.
    5. B. Boockmann & Paul Thurner, 2006. "Flexibility provisions in multilateral environmental treaties," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 113-135, June.
    6. Taishi Sugiyama & Jonathan Sinton, 2005. "Orchestra of Treaties: A Future Climate Regime Scenario with Multiple Treaties among Like-minded Countries," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 65-88, March.
    7. Harro Asselt, 2007. "Rüdiger Wolfrum and Nele Matz, Conflicts in International Environmental Law," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 7(3), pages 305-311, September.
    8. Antto Vihma, 2009. "Friendly neighbor or Trojan Horse? Assessing the interaction of soft law initiatives and the UN climate regime," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 9(3), pages 239-262, August.
    9. Bård Lahn, 2018. "In the light of equity and science: scientific expertise and climate justice after Paris," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 29-43, February.
    10. Koremenos, Barbara, 2001. "Loosening the Ties that Bind: A Learning Model of Agreement Flexibility," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 55(2), pages 289-325, April.
    11. Ning Liu & Carl Middleton, 2017. "Regional clustering of chemicals and waste multilateral environmental agreements to improve enforcement," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 17(6), pages 899-919, December.
    12. Jing Liu & Michael Faure, 2018. "Risk-sharing agreements to cover environmental damage: theory and practice," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 255-273, April.
    13. Haas, Peter M., 1992. "Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 46(1), pages 1-35, January.
    14. Manish Kumar Shrivastava & Saradindu Bhaduri, 2019. "Market-based mechanism and ‘climate justice’: reframing the debate for a way forward," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 497-513, October.
    15. Marco Grasso, 2011. "The role of justice in the North–South conflict in climate change: the case of negotiations on the Adaptation Fund," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 11(4), pages 361-377, November.
    16. Alexis Hickman, 2011. "M. Faure and S. Ying: China and International Environmental Liability: legal remedies for transboundary pollution," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 11(2), pages 201-203, May.
    17. Otto Spijkers, 2020. "The no significant harm principle and the human right to water," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 699-712, December.
    18. Gotor, Elisabetta & Caracciolo, Francesco & Watts, Jamie, 2010. "The Perceived Impact of the In-Trust Agreements on CGIAR Germplasm Availability: An Assessment of Bioversity International's Institutional Activities," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 38(10), pages 1486-1493, October.
    19. Oran Young, 2003. "Environmental Governance: The Role of Institutions in Causing and Confronting Environmental Problems," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 3(4), pages 377-393, December.
    20. Paul Harris & Alice Chow & Rasmus Karlsson, 2013. "China and climate justice: moving beyond statism," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 291-305, September.
    21. Attila M. Tanzi, 2020. "The inter-relationship between no harm, equitable and reasonable utilisation and cooperation under international water law," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 619-629, December.
    22. Jürg Vollenweider, 2013. "The effectiveness of international environmental agreements," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 343-367, September.
    23. Sylvia Karlsson, 2008. "J. J. Kirton and M. J. Trebilcock 2004, Hard Choices, Soft Law: Voluntary Standards in Global Trade, Environment and Social Governance," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 8(4), pages 413-415, December.
    24. Marjanneke Vijge, 2013. "The promise of new institutionalism: explaining the absence of a World or United Nations Environment Organisation," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 153-176, May.
    25. Francisco J. Alcaraz-Quiles & Andrés Navarro-Galera & David Ortiz-Rodríguez, 2020. "The contribution of the right to information laws in Europe to local government transparency on sustainability," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 161-178, March.
    26. Tatiana Zaharchenko & Gretta Goldenman, 2004. "Accountability in Governance: The Challenge of Implementing the Aarhus Convention in Eastern Europe and Central Asia," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 4(3), pages 229-251, September.
    27. Zinatul Zainol & Rohaida Nordin & Frank Akpoviri, 2015. "Mandatory labelling of genetically modified (GM) foods," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 199-216, May.
    28. Rakhyun Kim & Brendan Mackey, 2014. "International environmental law as a complex adaptive system," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 5-24, March.
    29. Gurdial Singh Nijar & Sélim Louafi & Eric W. Welch, 2017. "The implementation of the Nagoya ABS Protocol for the research sector: experience and challenges," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 17(5), pages 607-621, October.
    30. Mara Tignino & Christian Bréthaut, 2020. "The role of international case law in implementing the obligation not to cause significant harm," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 631-648, December.
    31. Marco Grasso, 2008. "Edward A. Page, Climate Change, Justice and Future Generations," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 183-186, June.
    32. Carel Dieperink, 2011. "International water negotiations under asymmetry, Lessons from the Rhine chlorides dispute settlement (1931–2004)," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 11(2), pages 139-157, May.
    33. René Audet, 2013. "Climate justice and bargaining coalitions: a discourse analysis," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 369-386, September.
    34. Peter Sand, 2001. "A Century of Green Lessons: The Contribution of Nature Conservation Regimes to Global Governance," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 33-72, January.
    35. Joyeeta Gupta & Susanne Schmeier, 2020. "Future proofing the principle of no significant harm," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 731-747, December.
    36. Susanne Schmeier & Joyeeta Gupta, 2020. "The principle of no significant harm in international water law," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 597-600, December.
    37. Oran R. Young & Olav Schram Stokke, 2020. "Why is it hard to solve environmental problems? The perils of institutional reductionism and institutional overload," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 5-19, March.
    38. Ellen Hey, 2001. "The Climate Change Regime: An Enviro-Economic Problem and International Administrative Law in the Making," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 75-100, January.
    39. Jen Iris Allan & David Downie & Jessica Templeton, 2018. "Experimenting with TripleCOPs: Productive innovation or counterproductive complexity?," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 557-572, August.
    40. Stephan Hoch & Axel Michaelowa & Aglaja Espelage & Anne-Kathrin Weber, 2019. "Governing complexity: How can the interplay of multilateral environmental agreements be harnessed for effective international market-based climate policy instruments?," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 19(6), pages 595-613, December.
    41. Xuyu Hu, 2020. "The doctrine of liability fixation of state responsibility in the convention on transboundary pollution damage," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 179-195, March.
    42. Thomas Hickmann & Joshua Philipp Elsässer, 2020. "New alliances in global environmental governance: how intergovernmental treaty secretariats interact with non-state actors to address transboundary environmental problems," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 459-481, September.
    43. Raul Lejano, 2006. "The Design of Environmental Regimes: Social Construction, Contextuality, and Improvisation," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 187-207, June.
    44. Margot Hurlbert, 2020. "Access and allocation: rights to water, sanitation and hygiene," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 339-358, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Deborah Barros Leal Farias, 2023. "Country differentiation in the global environmental context: Who is ‘developing’ and according to what?," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 253-269, September.
    2. Joyeeta Gupta & Courtney Vegelin & Nicky Pouw, 2022. "Lessons learnt from international environmental agreements for the Stockholm + 50 Conference: celebrating 20 Years of INEA," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 229-244, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Agni Kalfagianni & Oran R. Young, 2022. "The politics of multilateral environmental agreements lessons from 20 years of INEA," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 245-262, June.
    2. Naho Mirumachi & Margot Hurlbert, 2022. "Reflecting on twenty years of international agreements concerning water governance: insights and key learning," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 317-332, June.
    3. Joyeeta Gupta & Aarti Gupta & Courtney Vegelin, 2022. "Equity, justice and the SDGs: lessons learnt from two decades of INEA scholarship," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 393-409, June.
    4. Matilda Petersson & Peter Stoett, 2022. "Lessons learnt in global biodiversity governance," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 333-352, June.
    5. Philipp Pattberg & Cille Kaiser & Oscar Widerberg & Johannes Stripple, 2022. "20 Years of global climate change governance research: taking stock and moving forward," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 295-315, June.
    6. Joanna Fatch & Alex Bolding & Larry A. Swatuk, 2023. "Boundaries of benefit sharing: interpretation and application of substantive rules in the Lake Malawi/Niassa/Nyasa sub-basin of the Zambezi Watercourse," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 77-97, March.
    7. Joshua Philipp Elsässer & Thomas Hickmann & Sikina Jinnah & Sebastian Oberthür & Thijs Graaf, 2022. "Institutional interplay in global environmental governance: lessons learned and future research," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 373-391, June.
    8. Sylvia Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen & Harro Asselt, 2009. "Introduction: exploring and explaining the Asia-Pacific Partnership on Clean Development and Climate," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 9(3), pages 195-211, August.
    9. Raul Lejano, 2006. "The Design of Environmental Regimes: Social Construction, Contextuality, and Improvisation," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 187-207, June.
    10. Nicky R. M. Pouw & Hans-Peter Weikard & Richard B. Howarth, 2022. "Economic analysis of international environmental agreements: lessons learnt 2000–2020," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 279-294, June.
    11. Amandine Bled, 2009. "Business to the rescue: private sector actors and global environmental regimes’ legitimacy," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 9(2), pages 153-171, May.
    12. Chaewoon Oh, 2022. "Evaluation of the UNFCCC Technology Mechanism’s contribution to an international climate policy framework," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 527-542, September.
    13. Charles Chester & William Moomaw, 2008. "A taxonomy of collaborative governance: a guide to understanding the diversity of international and domestic conservation accords," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 8(3), pages 187-206, September.
    14. Jilong Yang, 2022. "Understanding China’s changing engagement in global climate governance: a struggle for identity," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 357-376, December.
    15. Christopher Marcoux, 2009. "Institutional Flexibility in the Design of Multilateral Environmental Agreements," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 26(2), pages 209-228, April.
    16. Claude Paraponaris, 2017. "Plateformes numériques, conception ouverte et emploi," Post-Print halshs-01614430, HAL.
    17. Andrew B. Whitford & Derrick Anderson, 2021. "Governance landscapes for emerging technologies: The case of cryptocurrencies," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(4), pages 1053-1070, October.
    18. Barry Eichengreen and Fabio Ghironi., 1997. "European Monetary Unification and International Monetary Cooperation," Center for International and Development Economics Research (CIDER) Working Papers C97-091, University of California at Berkeley.
    19. Jeanie Bukowski, 2017. "A “new water culture†on the Iberian Peninsula? Evaluating epistemic community impact on water resources management policy," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 35(2), pages 239-264, March.
    20. Mateos-Garcia, Juan & Steinmueller, W. Edward, 2008. "The institutions of open source software: Examining the Debian community," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 333-344, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ieaple:v:22:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s10784-022-09572-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.