IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/grdene/v32y2023i3d10.1007_s10726-023-09823-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mixed Feelings: Effects of Mood Diversity on Groups’ Discussion of Disconfirming Information and Evaluation of Alternatives

Author

Listed:
  • Ece Tuncel

    (Webster University)

  • Lorna Doucet

    (Fudan University)

Abstract

In organizational groups, expertise and information are often distributed among group members, thus making information sharing a necessity for group success. We examine the role of mood diversity on the discussion of disconfirming information and evaluation of decision alternatives in groups. In a laboratory experiment, using a hidden profile task, we manipulated mood diversity in 36 four-person, same-sex groups. Results indicated that mood diversity (vs. homogeneity) was positively related to groups’ focus on disconfirming information, which ultimately led to a more accurate evaluation of their decision alternatives. Results of the study expand our understanding of how mood composition of groups affects their discussion dynamics and decision evaluation.

Suggested Citation

  • Ece Tuncel & Lorna Doucet, 2023. "Mixed Feelings: Effects of Mood Diversity on Groups’ Discussion of Disconfirming Information and Evaluation of Alternatives," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 729-748, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:grdene:v:32:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s10726-023-09823-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s10726-023-09823-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10726-023-09823-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10726-023-09823-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Forgas, Joseph P. & George, Jennifer M., 2001. "Affective Influences on Judgments and Behavior in Organizations: An Information Processing Perspective," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 86(1), pages 3-34, September.
    2. David P. Brandon & Andrea B. Hollingshead, 2004. "Transactive Memory Systems in Organizations: Matching Tasks, Expertise, and People," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(6), pages 633-644, December.
    3. Isen, Alice M. & Geva, Nehemia, 1987. "The influence of positive affect on acceptable level of risk: The person with a large canoe has a large worry," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 145-154, April.
    4. Lu Wang & Lorna Doucet & Mary Waller & Karin Sanders & Sybil Phillips, 2016. "A Laughing Matter: Patterns of Laughter and the Effectiveness of Working Dyads," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(5), pages 1142-1160, October.
    5. Kramer, Roderick M. & Newton, Elizabeth & Pommerenke, Pamela L., 1993. "Self-Enhancement Biases and Negotiator Judgment: Effects of Self-Esteem and Mood," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 110-133, October.
    6. Argote, Linda & Ingram, Paul, 2000. "Knowledge Transfer: A Basis for Competitive Advantage in Firms," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 82(1), pages 150-169, May.
    7. Kelly, Janice R. & Barsade, Sigal G., 2001. "Mood and Emotions in Small Groups and Work Teams," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 86(1), pages 99-130, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daan van Knippenberg & Hanneke J. M. Kooij-de Bode & Wendy P. van Ginkel, 2010. "The Interactive Effects of Mood and Trait Negative Affect in Group Decision Making," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(3), pages 731-744, June.
    2. Yochi Cohen-Charash & Charles A Scherbaum & John D Kammeyer-Mueller & Barry M Staw, 2013. "Mood and the Market: Can Press Reports of Investors' Mood Predict Stock Prices?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(8), pages 1-15, August.
    3. Elfenbein, Hillary Anger, 2007. "Emotion in Organizations: A Review in Stages," Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, Working Paper Series qt2bn0n9mv, Institute of Industrial Relations, UC Berkeley.
    4. Kopelman, Shirli & Rosette, Ashleigh Shelby & Thompson, Leigh, 2006. "The three faces of Eve: Strategic displays of positive, negative, and neutral emotions in negotiations," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 99(1), pages 81-101, January.
    5. Lu Wang & Lorna Doucet & Mary Waller & Karin Sanders & Sybil Phillips, 2016. "A Laughing Matter: Patterns of Laughter and the Effectiveness of Working Dyads," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(5), pages 1142-1160, October.
    6. Wang, Youying & Huang, Qian & Davison, Robert M. & Yang, Feng, 2018. "Effect of transactive memory systems on team performance mediated by knowledge transfer," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 65-79.
    7. Au, Kevin & Chan, Forrest & Wang, Denis & Vertinsky, Ilan, 2003. "Mood in foreign exchange trading: Cognitive processes and performance," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 91(2), pages 322-338, July.
    8. Treffers, T. & Koellinger, Ph.D. & Picot, A.O., 2012. "In the Mood for Risk? A Random-Assignment Experiment Addressing the Effects of Moods on Risk Preferences," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2012-014-ORG, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    9. Dorota Leszczyńska & Laurence Saglietto, 2014. "Transformation and Perception: How an Information System Project Can Be Carried out Successfully," Working Papers 2014-267, Department of Research, Ipag Business School.
    10. Leon Zolotoy & Don O’Sullivan & Myeong-Gu Seo & Madhu Veeraraghavan, 2021. "Mood and Ethical Decision Making: Positive Affect and Corporate Philanthropy," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 171(1), pages 189-208, June.
    11. Cristofaro, Matteo, 2019. "The role of affect in management decisions: A systematic review," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 6-17.
    12. Peter J. Carnevale, 2008. "Positive affect and decision frame in negotiation," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 51-63, January.
    13. Schneckenberg, Dirk & Truong, Yann & Mazloomi, Hamid, 2015. "Microfoundations of innovative capabilities: The leverage of collaborative technologies on organizational learning and knowledge management in a multinational corporation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 356-368.
    14. Linda Argote & Ella Miron-Spektor, 2011. "Organizational Learning: From Experience to Knowledge," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(5), pages 1123-1137, October.
    15. Miriam Rennung & Anja S Göritz, 2015. "Facing Sorrow as a Group Unites. Facing Sorrow in a Group Divides," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(9), pages 1-22, September.
    16. Sylvia Hubner & Matthias Baum & Michael Frese, 2020. "Contagion of Entrepreneurial Passion: Effects on Employee Outcomes," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 44(6), pages 1112-1140, November.
    17. Andrew W. Lo & Dmitry V. Repin & Brett N. Steenbarger, 2005. "Fear and Greed in Financial Markets: A Clinical Study of Day-Traders," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 95(2), pages 352-359, May.
    18. Maw–Der Foo & Marilyn A. Uy & Charles Murnieks, 2015. "Beyond Affective Valence: Untangling Valence and Activation Influences on Opportunity Identification," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 39(2), pages 407-431, March.
    19. Felipe A. Csaszar & Nicolaj Siggelkow, 2010. "How Much to Copy? Determinants of Effective Imitation Breadth," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(3), pages 661-676, June.
    20. Bertermann, Britta & Virgillito, Alfredo & Naegele, Gerhard & Wilkesmann, Uwe, 2015. "Werkzeugkasten Wissenstransfer: Entwicklung einer praktischen Handlungshilfe für Betriebs- und Personalräte," Study / edition der Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf, volume 127, number 291, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:grdene:v:32:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s10726-023-09823-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.