IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/gjorer/v8y2022i2d10.1365_s41056-022-00058-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Transforming workplaces into performing workspaces—Holistic evaluation concept for managing workspace change projects

Author

Listed:
  • Annette Kämpf-Dern

    (Frankfurt University of Applied Sciences)

  • Mascha Will-Zocholl

    (Hessian University for Public Management and Security)

Abstract

Transforming traditional workplaces into high-performing workspaces is a complex venture, not only in terms of design and preparation, but also in terms of implementation and management with regard to the realization of the intended goals. To be successful, holistic management is essential. Starting with the definition of goals and performance metrics, evaluation must be established from the very beginning and then continuously be applied to the project. The evaluation concept—like a controlling system, only with workspace-specific aspects and KPIs—covers two areas: The main dimensions of workspace design with the involved stakeholders and their performance parameters, and the processes of implementation, the change management aspects. The interaction of these areas must also be considered. The overall study discusses both success factors and potential pitfalls regarding the content and processes of designing and implementing modern office work environments in Germany. The study excerpt presented here addresses the evaluation of transformation projects in the field of working environments. Conceptually, instruments of marketing research are combined with components of controlling systems to develop an evaluation concept, which was then applied in a first empirical concept test at a German financial institution. An evaluation concept supports those responsible for the workspace project to keep on track by deducting and tracking relevant KPIs, offering tools and methods for group and team processes regarding the change project, and providing those. To combine design and change management of workspace projects in one evaluation concept and to provide a structured list of possible instruments/methods for evaluation over the different phases of such a project is new and thus original for workspace management.

Suggested Citation

  • Annette Kämpf-Dern & Mascha Will-Zocholl, 2022. "Transforming workplaces into performing workspaces—Holistic evaluation concept for managing workspace change projects," Zeitschrift für Immobilienökonomie (German Journal of Real Estate Research), Springer;Gesellschaft für Immobilienwirtschaftliche Forschung e. V., vol. 8(2), pages 189-211, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:gjorer:v:8:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1365_s41056-022-00058-y
    DOI: 10.1365/s41056-022-00058-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1365/s41056-022-00058-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1365/s41056-022-00058-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Toker, Umut & Gray, Denis O., 2008. "Innovation spaces: Workspace planning and innovation in U.S. university research centers," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 309-329, March.
    2. Rob Harris, 2015. "The changing nature of the workplace and the future of office space," Journal of Property Investment & Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 33(5), pages 424-435, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Craig Boardman & Denis Gray, 2010. "The new science and engineering management: cooperative research centers as government policies, industry strategies, and organizations," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 35(5), pages 445-459, October.
    2. Lei Peng & Ruiying Jia, 2023. "Exploring the Interplay of the Physical Environment and Organizational Climate in Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-20, October.
    3. Fakhraddin Maroofi, 2016. "Investigating The Links Between The Distinct Layers Of An Organisation’S Culture And Innovative Behaviours," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(07), pages 1-28, October.
    4. Fernanda Antunes Batista da Silva, 2021. "Flexible workspaces within corporate real estate," LARES lares-2021-4dqc, Latin American Real Estate Society (LARES).
    5. Martin Christian Höcker & Yassien Bachtal & Andreas Pfnür, 2022. "Work from home: bane or blessing? Implications for corporate real estate strategies [Work from Home: Fluch oder Segen? Implikationen für das betriebliche Immobilienmanagement]," Zeitschrift für Immobilienökonomie (German Journal of Real Estate Research), Springer;Gesellschaft für Immobilienwirtschaftliche Forschung e. V., vol. 8(2), pages 101-137, October.
    6. Matthew Baggetta & Brad R. Fulton & Zoe Caplan, 2022. "Space and Interaction in Civil Society Organizations: An Exploratory Study in a US City," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(3), pages 307-318.
    7. Altaf, Aqsa & Hassan, Ibn e & Batool, Sana, 2019. "The role of ORIC in the evolution of the triple helix culture of innovation: The case of Pakistan," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 157-166.
    8. von Krogh, Georg & Geilinger, Nina, 2014. "Knowledge creation in the eco-system: Research imperatives," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 155-163.
    9. Jan Gerard Hoendervanger & Anja F Ernst & Casper J Albers & Mark P Mobach & Nico W Van Yperen, 2018. "Individual differences in satisfaction with activity-based work environments," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(3), pages 1-15, March.
    10. Ponomariov, Branco L. & Boardman, P. Craig, 2010. "Influencing scientists' collaboration and productivity patterns through new institutions: University research centers and scientific and technical human capital," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 613-624, June.
    11. Craig Boardman & Barry Bozeman, 2015. "Academic faculty as intellectual property in university-industry research alliances," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(5), pages 403-420, July.
    12. Oluremi B Ayoko & Neal M Ashkanasy, 2020. "The physical environment of office work: Future open plan offices," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 45(3), pages 488-506, August.
    13. Ayoko, Oluremi B. & Ashkanasy, Neal M. & Li, Yiqiong & Dorris, Alana & Jehn, Karen A., 2023. "An experience sampling study of employees’ reactions to noise in the open-plan office," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(PB).
    14. Jaroslaw Morawski, 2022. "Impact of working from home on European office rents and vacancy rates," Zeitschrift für Immobilienökonomie (German Journal of Real Estate Research), Springer;Gesellschaft für Immobilienwirtschaftliche Forschung e. V., vol. 8(2), pages 173-188, October.
    15. Qi Zhen & Anxiao Zhang & Qiong Huang & Jing Li & Yiming Du & Qi Zhang, 2022. "Overview of the Role of Spatial Factors in Indoor SARS-CoV-2 Transmission: A Space-Based Framework for Assessing the Multi-Route Infection Risk," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-38, September.
    16. Hogan, Suellen J. & Coote, Leonard V., 2014. "Organizational culture, innovation, and performance: A test of Schein's model," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(8), pages 1609-1621.
    17. Robert J Rogerson & Bob Giddings, 2021. "The future of the city centre: Urbanisation, transformation and resilience – a tale of two Newcastle cities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(10), pages 1967-1982, August.
    18. Hautala, Johanna & Jauhiainen, Jussi S., 2014. "Spatio-temporal processes of knowledge creation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(4), pages 655-668.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:gjorer:v:8:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1365_s41056-022-00058-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.