IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/flsman/v29y2017i3d10.1007_s10696-016-9247-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Real-time container storage location assignment at a seaport container transshipment terminal: dispersion levels, yard templates, and sensitivity analyses

Author

Listed:
  • Matthew E. H. Petering

    (University of Wisconsin—Milwaukee)

  • Yong Wu

    (Griffith University)

  • Wenkai Li

    (International University of Japan)

  • Mark Goh

    (National University of Singapore
    The Logistics Institute-Asia Pacific)

  • Robert Souza

    (The Logistics Institute-Asia Pacific)

  • Katta G. Murty

    (University of Michigan)

Abstract

We present the results of four experiments that link a seaport container terminal’s overall productivity to the system that automatically selects storage locations for export containers in real time as they enter the terminal. Experiment 1 introduces the concept of a container dispersion level and tests the performance of several dispersion levels at various terminals. Experiment 2 considers the math-programming-based yard template concept that has received much attention in recent years. By evaluating yard templates under simulated operating conditions, we provide a link between yard templates and overall terminal productivity that has been absent from previous studies. Experiments 3 and 4 examine how the vessel berthing policy and yard truck traveling speed affect the performance of the storage systems considered in Experiments 1–2. The experiments provide insight into options for real-time decision making at container terminals that is rare in that (1) performance is measured in overall terms and (2) detailed measures of performance for all entities—berths, vessels, groundslots, quay cranes, yard cranes, yard trucks, and containers—involved in every container’s complete lifetime at the terminal are provided.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthew E. H. Petering & Yong Wu & Wenkai Li & Mark Goh & Robert Souza & Katta G. Murty, 2017. "Real-time container storage location assignment at a seaport container transshipment terminal: dispersion levels, yard templates, and sensitivity analyses," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 369-402, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:flsman:v:29:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s10696-016-9247-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s10696-016-9247-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10696-016-9247-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10696-016-9247-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jiang, Xinjia & Lee, Loo Hay & Chew, Ek Peng & Han, Yongbin & Tan, Kok Choon, 2012. "A container yard storage strategy for improving land utilization and operation efficiency in a transshipment hub port," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 221(1), pages 64-73.
    2. Petering, Matthew E.H., 2011. "Decision support for yard capacity, fleet composition, truck substitutability, and scalability issues at seaport container terminals," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 85-103, January.
    3. M Flavia Monaco & Luigi Moccia & Marcello Sammarra, 2009. "Operations Research for the management of a transhipment container terminal: The Gioia Tauro case," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 11(1), pages 7-35, March.
    4. Jin, Jian Gang & Lee, Der-Horng & Hu, Hao, 2015. "Tactical berth and yard template design at container transshipment terminals: A column generation based approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 168-184.
    5. Petering, Matthew E.H., 2009. "Effect of block width and storage yard layout on marine container terminal performance," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 591-610, July.
    6. Lim, Andrew & Xu, Zhou, 2006. "A critical-shaking neighborhood search for the yard allocation problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(2), pages 1247-1259, October.
    7. Cordeau, Jean-Francois & Gaudioso, Manlio & Laporte, Gilbert & Moccia, Luigi, 2007. "The service allocation problem at the Gioia Tauro Maritime Terminal," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 176(2), pages 1167-1184, January.
    8. L Zhen, 2013. "Yard template planning in transshipment hubs under uncertain berthing time and position," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 64(9), pages 1418-1428, September.
    9. Tao, Yi & Lee, Chung-Yee, 2015. "Joint planning of berth and yard allocation in transshipment terminals using multi-cluster stacking strategy," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 34-50.
    10. Zhen, Lu & Xu, Zhou & Wang, Kai & Ding, Yi, 2016. "Multi-period yard template planning in container terminals," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 93(PB), pages 700-719.
    11. Z Fu & Y Li & A Lim & B Rodrigues, 2007. "Port space allocation with a time dimension," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 58(6), pages 797-807, June.
    12. Lu Zhen & Ek Peng Chew & Loo Hay Lee, 2011. "An Integrated Model for Berth Template and Yard Template Planning in Transshipment Hubs," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(4), pages 483-504, November.
    13. Zhen, Lu, 2014. "Container yard template planning under uncertain maritime market," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 199-217.
    14. Zhen, Lu, 2016. "Modeling of yard congestion and optimization of yard template in container ports," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 83-104.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. T. Jonker & M. B. Duinkerken & N. Yorke-Smith & A. Waal & R. R. Negenborn, 2021. "Coordinated optimization of equipment operations in a container terminal," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 281-311, June.
    2. Feng, Yuanjun & Song, Dong-Ping & Li, Dong, 2022. "Smart stacking for import containers using customer information at automated container terminals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(2), pages 502-522.
    3. Zhen, Lu & Hu, Yi & Wang, Shuaian & Laporte, Gilbert & Wu, Yiwei, 2019. "Fleet deployment and demand fulfillment for container shipping liners," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 15-32.
    4. Yang, Lingyi & Ng, Tsan Sheng & Lee, Loo Hay, 2022. "A robust approximation for yard template optimization under uncertainty," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 21-53.
    5. Damla Kizilay & Deniz Türsel Eliiyi, 2021. "A comprehensive review of quay crane scheduling, yard operations and integrations thereof in container terminals," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 1-42, March.
    6. Maria A. M. Trindade & Paulo S. A. Sousa & Maria R. A. Moreira, 2022. "Ramping up a heuristic procedure for storage location assignment problem with precedence constraints," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 646-669, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhou, Chenhao & Wang, Wencheng & Li, Haobin, 2020. "Container reshuffling considered space allocation problem in container terminals," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    2. Wang, Mengyao & Zhou, Chenhao & Wang, Aihu, 2022. "A cluster-based yard template design integrated with yard crane deployment using a placement heuristic," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    3. Zhen, Lu & Zhuge, Dan & Wang, Shuaian & Wang, Kai, 2022. "Integrated berth and yard space allocation under uncertainty," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1-27.
    4. Zhen, Lu, 2016. "Modeling of yard congestion and optimization of yard template in container ports," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 83-104.
    5. Kai Wang & Lu Zhen & Shuaian Wang, 2018. "Column Generation for the Integrated Berth Allocation, Quay Crane Assignment, and Yard Assignment Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(4), pages 812-834, August.
    6. Liu, Ming & Lee, Chung-Yee & Zhang, Zizhen & Chu, Chengbin, 2016. "Bi-objective optimization for the container terminal integrated planning," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 93(PB), pages 720-749.
    7. Carlo, Héctor J. & Vis, Iris F.A. & Roodbergen, Kees Jan, 2014. "Storage yard operations in container terminals: Literature overview, trends, and research directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 412-430.
    8. Jiang, Xin Jia & Jin, Jian Gang, 2017. "A branch-and-price method for integrated yard crane deployment and container allocation in transshipment yards," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 62-75.
    9. Yang, Lingyi & Ng, Tsan Sheng & Lee, Loo Hay, 2022. "A robust approximation for yard template optimization under uncertainty," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 21-53.
    10. Damla Kizilay & Deniz Türsel Eliiyi, 2021. "A comprehensive review of quay crane scheduling, yard operations and integrations thereof in container terminals," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 1-42, March.
    11. Liu, Changchun, 2020. "Iterative heuristic for simultaneous allocations of berths, quay cranes, and yards under practical situations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    12. Zhen, Lu & Xu, Zhou & Wang, Kai & Ding, Yi, 2016. "Multi-period yard template planning in container terminals," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 93(PB), pages 700-719.
    13. H. L. Ma & S. H. Chung & H. K. Chan & Li Cui, 2019. "An integrated model for berth and yard planning in container terminals with multi-continuous berth layout," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 273(1), pages 409-431, February.
    14. Amir Gharehgozli & Nima Zaerpour & Rene Koster, 2020. "Container terminal layout design: transition and future," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(4), pages 610-639, December.
    15. Zhen, Lu, 2014. "Container yard template planning under uncertain maritime market," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 199-217.
    16. Jin, Jian Gang & Lee, Der-Horng & Hu, Hao, 2015. "Tactical berth and yard template design at container transshipment terminals: A column generation based approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 168-184.
    17. Zhen, Lu & Shen, Tao & Wang, Shuaian & Yu, Shucheng, 2016. "Models on ship scheduling in transshipment hubs with considering bunker cost," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 111-121.
    18. Robenek, Tomáš & Umang, Nitish & Bierlaire, Michel & Ropke, Stefan, 2014. "A branch-and-price algorithm to solve the integrated berth allocation and yard assignment problem in bulk ports," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 399-411.
    19. Martin Alcalde, Enrique & Kim, Kap Hwan & Marchán, Sergi Saurí, 2015. "Optimal space for storage yard considering yard inventory forecasts and terminal performance," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 101-128.
    20. Youn Ju Woo & Jang-Ho Song & Kap Hwan Kim, 2016. "Pricing storage of outbound containers in container terminals," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 644-668, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:flsman:v:29:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s10696-016-9247-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.