IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/eurpop/v37y2021i1d10.1007_s10680-020-09561-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Separation and Elevated Residential Mobility: A Cross-Country Comparison

Author

Listed:
  • Hill Kulu

    (University of St Andrews)

  • Júlia Mikolai

    (University of St Andrews)

  • Michael J. Thomas

    (University of Groningen
    Statistics Norway)

  • Sergi Vidal

    (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona)

  • Christine Schnor

    (Université Catholique de Louvain)

  • Didier Willaert

    (Vrije Universiteit Brussel)

  • Fieke H. L. Visser

    (University of Groningen)

  • Clara H. Mulder

    (University of Groningen)

Abstract

This study investigates the magnitude and persistence of elevated post-separation residential mobility (i.e. residential instability) in five countries (Australia, Belgium, Germany, the Netherlands, and the UK) with similar levels of economic development, but different welfare provisions and housing markets. While many studies examine residential changes related to separation in selected individual countries, only very few have compared patterns across countries. Using longitudinal data and applying Poisson regression models, we study the risk of a move of separated men and women compared with cohabiting and married individuals. We use time since separation to distinguish between moves due to separation and moves of separated individuals. Our analysis shows that separated men and women are significantly more likely to move than cohabiting and married individuals. The risk of a residential change is the highest shortly after separation, and it decreases with duration since separation. However, the magnitude of this decline varies by country. In Belgium, mobility rates remain elevated for a long period after separation, whereas in the Netherlands, post-separation residential instability appears brief, with mobility rates declining rapidly. The results suggest that housing markets are likely to shape the residential mobility of separated individuals. In countries, where mortgages are easy to access and affordable rental properties are widespread, separated individuals can rapidly adjust their housing to new family circumstances; in contrast, in countries with limited access to homeownership and small social rental markets, separated individuals experience a prolonged period of residential instability.

Suggested Citation

  • Hill Kulu & Júlia Mikolai & Michael J. Thomas & Sergi Vidal & Christine Schnor & Didier Willaert & Fieke H. L. Visser & Clara H. Mulder, 2021. "Separation and Elevated Residential Mobility: A Cross-Country Comparison," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 37(1), pages 121-150, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:eurpop:v:37:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s10680-020-09561-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s10680-020-09561-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10680-020-09561-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10680-020-09561-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cynthia Osborne & Lawrence Berger & Katherine Magnuson, 2012. "Family Structure Transitions and Changes in Maternal Resources and Well-being," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 49(1), pages 23-47, February.
    2. Júlia Mikolai & Hill Kulu, 2018. "Short- and long-term effects of divorce and separation on housing tenure in England and Wales," Population Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 72(1), pages 17-39, January.
    3. Francesca Fiori, 2019. "Who leaves, who stays? Gendered routes out of the family home following union dissolution in Italy," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 40(20), pages 533-560.
    4. Castles, Francis G., 2004. "The Future of the Welfare State: Crisis Myths and Crisis Realities," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199273928.
    5. Feijten Peteke & Maarten van Ham, 2007. "Residential mobility and migration of the separated," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 17(21), pages 623-654.
    6. Júlia Mikolai & Hill Kulu & Sergi Vidal & Roselinde van der Wiel & Clara H. Mulder, 2019. "Separation, divorce, and housing tenure: A cross-country comparison," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 41(39), pages 1131-1146.
    7. Arnstein Aassve & Gianni Betti & Stefano Mazzuco & Letizia Mencarini, 2007. "Marital disruption and economic well‐being: a comparative analysis," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 170(3), pages 781-799, July.
    8. Michael J. Thomas & Clara H. Mulder, 2016. "Partnership patterns and homeownership: a cross-country comparison of Germany, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(8), pages 935-963, November.
    9. Clara Mulder & Michael Wagner, 2012. "Moving after Separation: The Role of Location-specific Capital," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(6), pages 839-852.
    10. Júlia Mikolai & Hill Kulu, 2018. "Divorce, Separation, and Housing Changes: A Multiprocess Analysis of Longitudinal Data from England and Wales," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 55(1), pages 83-106, February.
    11. Tina Hannemann & Hill Kulu, 2015. "Union formation and dissolution among immigrants and their descendants in the United Kingdom," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 33(10), pages 273-312.
    12. Júlia Mikolai & Hill Kulu, 2019. "Union dissolution and housing trajectories in Britain," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 41(7), pages 161-196.
    13. Juliet Stone & Ann Berrington & Jane Falkingham, 2014. "Gender, Turning Points, and Boomerangs: Returning Home in Young Adulthood in Great Britain," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 51(1), pages 257-276, February.
    14. Maria Iacovou & Alexandra J. Skew, 2011. "Household composition across the new Europe: Where do the new Member States fit in?," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 25(14), pages 465-490.
    15. Esping-Andersen, Gosta, 1999. "Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198742005.
    16. Jan M. Hoem & Giuseppe Gabrielli & Aiva Jasilioniene & Dora Kostova & Anna Matysiak, 2010. "Levels of recent union formation," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 22(9), pages 199-210.
    17. Gunnar Andersson & Elizabeth Thomson & Aija Duntava, 2017. "Life-table representations of family dynamics in the 21st century," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 37(35), pages 1081-1230.
    18. repec:bla:ausecr:v:41:y:2008:i:2:p:200-214 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Rory Coulter & Maarten van Ham & Peteke Feijten, 2011. "A Longitudinal Analysis of Moving Desires, Expectations and Actual Moving Behaviour," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 43(11), pages 2742-2760, November.
    20. Thomas J. Cooke & Clara H. Mulder & Michael Thomas, 2016. "Union dissolution and migration," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 34(26), pages 741-760.
    21. Larry A. Sjaastad, 1970. "The Costs and Returns of Human Migration," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Harry W. Richardson (ed.), Regional Economics, chapter 9, pages 115-133, Palgrave Macmillan.
    22. John Ermisch & Marco Francesconi, 2000. "Cohabitation in Great Britain: not for long, but here to stay," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 163(2), pages 153-171.
    23. Ron Lesthaeghe, 2010. "The Unfolding Story of the Second Demographic Transition," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 36(2), pages 211-251, June.
    24. Martin Bell & Elin Charles-Edwards & Philipp Ueffing & John Stillwell & Marek Kupiszewski & Dorota Kupiszewska, 2015. "Internal Migration and Development: Comparing Migration Intensities Around the World," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 41(1), pages 33-58, March.
    25. Chigavazira, Abraham & Fisher, Hayley & Robinson, Tim & Zhu, Anna, 2019. "The Consequences of Extending Equitable Property Division Divorce Laws to Cohabitants," Working Papers 2019-02, University of Sydney, School of Economics.
    26. Paul Boyle & Hill Kulu & Thomas Cooke & Vernon Gayle & Clara Mulder, 2008. "Moving and union dissolution," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 45(1), pages 209-222, February.
    27. Hill Kulu & Fiona Steele, 2013. "Interrelationships Between Childbearing and Housing Transitions in the Family Life Course," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 50(5), pages 1687-1714, October.
    28. Giulia Ferrari & Carole Bonnet & Anne Solaz, 2019. "‘Will the one who keeps the children keep the house?’ Residential mobility after divorce by parenthood status and custody arrangements in France," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 40(14), pages 359-394.
    29. William A. V. Clark & William Lisowski, 2017. "Decisions to move and decisions to stay: life course events and mobility outcomes," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(5), pages 547-565, July.
    30. Wilfred Uunk, 2004. "The Economic Consequences of Divorce for Women in the European Union: The Impact of Welfare State Arrangements," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 20(3), pages 251-285, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Júlia Mikolai & Hill Kulu & Clara H. Mulder, 2020. "Family life transitions, residential relocations, and housing in the life course: Current research and opportunities for future work: Introduction to the Special Collection on “Separation, Divorce, an," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 43(2), pages 35-58.
    2. Júlia Mikolai & Hill Kulu, 2019. "Union dissolution and housing trajectories in Britain," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 41(7), pages 161-196.
    3. Francesca Fiori, 2019. "Who leaves, who stays? Gendered routes out of the family home following union dissolution in Italy," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 40(20), pages 533-560.
    4. Lívia Murinkó, 2019. "Housing consequences of divorce and separation in a 'super home ownership' regime: The case of Hungary," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 40(34), pages 975-1014.
    5. Roselinde Wiel & Niels Kooiman & Clara H. Mulder, 2021. "Family Complexity and Parents’ Migration: The Role of Repartnering and Distance to Non-Resident Children," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 37(4), pages 877-907, November.
    6. Zuzana Žilinčíková & Christine Schnor, 2021. "Who moves out and who keeps the home? Short-term and medium-term mobility consequences of grey divorce in Belgium," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 45(9), pages 291-328.
    7. Christine Schnor & Júlia Mikolai, 2020. "Remain, leave, or return? Mothers’ location continuity after separation in Belgium," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 42(9), pages 245-292.
    8. Giuseppe Gabrielli & Roberto Impicciatore, 2020. "Living arrangements of adult children of immigrants in selected European countries," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 43(30), pages 889-928.
    9. Rory Coulter & Michael Thomas, 2019. "A new look at the housing antecedents of separation," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 40(26), pages 725-760.
    10. Júlia Mikolai & Hill Kulu, 2018. "Divorce, Separation, and Housing Changes: A Multiprocess Analysis of Longitudinal Data from England and Wales," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 55(1), pages 83-106, February.
    11. Júlia Mikolai & Hill Kulu & Sergi Vidal & Roselinde van der Wiel & Clara H. Mulder, 2019. "Separation, divorce, and housing tenure: A cross-country comparison," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 41(39), pages 1131-1146.
    12. Clara H. Mulder, 2018. "Putting family centre stage: Ties to nonresident family, internal migration, and immobility," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 39(43), pages 1151-1180.
    13. Marika Jalovaara & Hill Kulu, 2019. "Homeownership after separation: A longitudinal analysis of Finnish register data," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 41(29), pages 847-872.
    14. Giulia Ferrari & Carole Bonnet & Anne Solaz, 2019. "‘Will the one who keeps the children keep the house?’ Residential mobility after divorce by parenthood status and custody arrangements in France," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 40(14), pages 359-394.
    15. Sandra Krapf & Clara H. Mulder & Michael Wagner, 2022. "The Transition to a Coresidential Partnership: Who Moves and Who Has the Partner Move In?," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 41(2), pages 757-779, April.
    16. Juho H rk nen, 2017. "Diverging destinies in international perspective: Education, single motherhood, and child poverty," LIS Working papers 713, LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg.
    17. Julie Lacroix & Alain Gagnon & Philippe Wanner, 2020. "Family changes and residential mobility among immigrant and native-born populations: Evidence from Swiss administrative data," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 43(41), pages 1199-1234.
    18. Michael J. Thomas & Clara H. Mulder & Thomas J. Cooke, 2018. "Geographical Distances Between Separated Parents: A Longitudinal Analysis," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 34(4), pages 463-489, October.
    19. Knut Petzold, 2020. "Migration, Commuting, or a Second Home? Insights from an Experiment Among Academics," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 36(2), pages 277-315, April.
    20. Kirsten van Houdt, 2023. "Separation as an accelerator of housing inequalities: Parents’ and children’s post-separation housing careers in Sweden," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 49(4), pages 47-82.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:eurpop:v:37:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s10680-020-09561-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.