IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/eurphb/v92y2019i6d10.1140_epjb_e2019-90744-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How spread changes affect the order book: comparing the price responses of order deletions and placements to trades

Author

Listed:
  • Stephan Grimm

    (Fakultät für Physik, Universität Duisburg-Essen)

  • Thomas Guhr

    (Fakultät für Physik, Universität Duisburg-Essen)

Abstract

We observe the effects of the three different events that cause spread changes in the order book, namely trades, deletions and placement of limit orders. By looking at the frequencies of the relative amounts of price changing events, we discover that deletions of orders open the bid-ask spread of a stock more often than trades do. We see that once the amount of spread changes due to deletions exceeds the amount of the ones due to trades, other observables in the order book change as well. We then look at how these spread changing events affect the prices of stocks, by means of the price response. We not only see that the self-response of stocks is positive for both spread changing trades and deletions and negative for order placements, but also cross-response to other stocks and therefore the market as a whole. In addition, the self-response function of spread-changing trades is similar to that of all trades. This leads to the conclusion that spread changing deletions and order placements have a similar effect on the order book and stock prices over time as trades. Graphical abstract

Suggested Citation

  • Stephan Grimm & Thomas Guhr, 2019. "How spread changes affect the order book: comparing the price responses of order deletions and placements to trades," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 92(6), pages 1-11, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:eurphb:v:92:y:2019:i:6:d:10.1140_epjb_e2019-90744-3
    DOI: 10.1140/epjb/e2019-90744-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1140/epjb/e2019-90744-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1140/epjb/e2019-90744-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hausman, Jerry A. & Lo, Andrew W. & MacKinlay, A. Craig, 1992. "An ordered probit analysis of transaction stock prices," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 319-379, June.
    2. Mike, Szabolcs & Farmer, J. Doyne, 2008. "An empirical behavioral model of liquidity and volatility," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 200-234, January.
    3. Jean-Philippe Bouchaud & J. Doyne Farmer & Fabrizio Lillo, 2008. "How markets slowly digest changes in supply and demand," Papers 0809.0822, arXiv.org.
    4. Jerry A. Hausman & Andrew W. Lo & Craig A. MacKinlay, "undated". "An Ordered Probit Analysis of Transaction Stock Prices (Reprint 029)," Rodney L. White Center for Financial Research Working Papers 26-91, Wharton School Rodney L. White Center for Financial Research.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wang, Shanshan & Schreckenberg, Michael & Guhr, Thomas, 2023. "Response functions as a new concept to study local dynamics in traffic networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 626(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stephan Grimm & Thomas Guhr, 2018. "How spread changes affect the order book: Comparing the price responses of order deletions and placements to trades," Papers 1812.09067, arXiv.org.
    2. Ghysels, E. & Harvey, A. & Renault, E., 1995. "Stochastic Volatility," Papers 95.400, Toulouse - GREMAQ.
    3. Koopman, S.J.M. & Lai, H.N., 1998. "Modelling bid-ask spreads in competitive dealership markets," Other publications TiSEM 7a193911-dbf2-4831-ac8d-9, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    4. González, M. & Minguez, R., 2005. "The Method Of Simulated Maximum Likelihood For The Estimaton Of Dynamic Ordered Probit: An Application To Country-Risk For Non-Developed Countries," International Journal of Applied Econometrics and Quantitative Studies, Euro-American Association of Economic Development, vol. 2(3), pages 99-133.
    5. M. Cristelli & V. Alfi & L. Pietronero & A. Zaccaria, 2010. "Liquidity crisis, granularity of the order book and price fluctuations," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 73(1), pages 41-49, January.
    6. Clinet, Simon & Yoshida, Nakahiro, 2017. "Statistical inference for ergodic point processes and application to Limit Order Book," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 127(6), pages 1800-1839.
    7. Ban Zheng & Eric Moulines & Fr'ed'eric Abergel, 2012. "Price Jump Prediction in Limit Order Book," Papers 1204.1381, arXiv.org.
    8. Mi Yung Yoon, 1997. "Explaining U.S. Intervention in Third World Internal Wars, 1945-1989," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 41(4), pages 580-602, August.
    9. Lublóy, Ágnes & Gyarmati, Ákos & Váradi, Kata, 2012. "Virtuális árhatás a Budapesti Értéktőzsdén [Virtual price effects on the Budapest stock exchange]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(5), pages 508-539.
    10. Shrabani Mukherjee, 2015. "Entrepreneurial Choice of Investment Capital for House-based Industries," Review of Market Integration, India Development Foundation, vol. 7(3), pages 214-241, December.
    11. Ghysels, E. & Jasiak, J., 1994. "Stochastic Volatility and time Deformation: An Application of trading Volume and Leverage Effects," Cahiers de recherche 9403, Centre interuniversitaire de recherche en économie quantitative, CIREQ.
    12. Ban Zheng & Eric Moulines & Frédéric Abergel, 2013. "Price jump prediction in a limit order book," Post-Print hal-00684716, HAL.
    13. Anirban Chakraborti & Ioane Muni Toke & Marco Patriarca & Frédéric Abergel, 2011. "Econophysics review: II. Agent-based models," Post-Print hal-00621059, HAL.
    14. repec:hal:wpaper:hal-00684716 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Shrabani Mukherjee & Keshav Sood, 2020. "Triggers and Barriers of Financial Inclusion: A Country-Wise Analysis," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 10(9), pages 970-988, September.
    16. Debdulal Thakur & Shrabani Mukherjee, 2016. "Parents’ Choice Function for Wards’ School Continuation in Rural India: A Case Study in West Bengal," Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research, National Council of Applied Economic Research, vol. 10(1), pages 119-142, February.
    17. A. Zaccaria & M. Cristelli & V. Alfi & F. Ciulla & L. Pietronero, 2009. "Asymmetric statistics of order books: The role of discreteness and evidence for strategic order placement," Papers 0906.1387, arXiv.org, revised May 2010.
    18. Frank McGroarty & Ash Booth & Enrico Gerding & V. L. Raju Chinthalapati, 2019. "High frequency trading strategies, market fragility and price spikes: an agent based model perspective," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 282(1), pages 217-244, November.
    19. Daniel Fricke & Thomas Lux, 2015. "The effects of a financial transaction tax in an artificial financial market," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 10(1), pages 119-150, April.
    20. Gyarmati, Ákos & Lublóy, Ágnes & Váradi, Kata, 2012. "The Budapest liquidity measure and the price impact function," MPRA Paper 40339, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    21. Gianbiagio Curato & Jim Gatheral & Fabrizio Lillo, 2014. "Optimal execution with nonlinear transient market impact," Papers 1412.4839, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Statistical and Nonlinear Physics;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:eurphb:v:92:y:2019:i:6:d:10.1140_epjb_e2019-90744-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.