IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/eurphb/v92y2019i10d10.1140_epjb_e2019-100225-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A node representation learning approach for link prediction in social networks using game theory and K-core decomposition

Author

Listed:
  • Elaheh Nasiri

    (Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University)

  • Asgarali Bouyer

    (Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University)

  • Esmaeil Nourani

    (Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University)

Abstract

The role of social networks in people’s daily life is undeniable. Link prediction is one of the most important tasks of complex network analysis. Predicting links is currently becoming a concerned topic in social network analysis. Although many link prediction methods have been proposed in the recent years, most of the existing link prediction methods have unsatisfactory performance because of high time complexity, network size, sparsity, and similarity measures between node pairs for processing topological information. In this paper, we proposed a method for node representation learning and also a new embedding technique is used for generating latent features. We also proposed an improved version of the weighted random walk based on game theoretical technique and k-core decomposition. Node representations are generated via skipgram method. Although most of the link prediction methods have high time complexity, since our method uses Stochastic Gradient Descent for the optimization process, it has linear time complexity with respect to the number of vertices. This causes our algorithm to be scalable to large networks. In addition to that, sparsity is a huge challenge in complex networks and we cannot infer enough information from the structure of the network to make predictions. By learning a low-dimensional representation that captures the network structure, classification of nodes and edges can be done more easily. The performance of the proposed method was evaluated with some benchmark heuristic scores and state-of-the-art techniques on link prediction in several real-world networks. The experimental results show that the proposed method obtains higher accuracy in comparison with considered methods and measures. However, the time complexity is not improved effectively. Graphical abstract

Suggested Citation

  • Elaheh Nasiri & Asgarali Bouyer & Esmaeil Nourani, 2019. "A node representation learning approach for link prediction in social networks using game theory and K-core decomposition," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 92(10), pages 1-13, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:eurphb:v:92:y:2019:i:10:d:10.1140_epjb_e2019-100225-8
    DOI: 10.1140/epjb/e2019-100225-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1140/epjb/e2019-100225-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1140/epjb/e2019-100225-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R.J. Aumann & S. Hart (ed.), 2002. "Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications," Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications, Elsevier, edition 1, volume 3, number 3.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhengnan Lu & Yuting Zhang & Lan Xu, 2022. "Quality control decision of government procurement of elderly care service based on multi‐index fusion of Pythagoras TOPSIS: Perspective of complex network," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(6), pages 1773-1791, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marco Faravelli & Randall Walsh, 2011. "Smooth Politicians And Paternalistic Voters: A Theory Of Large Elections," Levine's Working Paper Archive 786969000000000250, David K. Levine.
    2. Jhinyoung Shin & Rajdeep Singh, 2010. "Corporate Disclosures: Strategic Donation of Information," International Review of Finance, International Review of Finance Ltd., vol. 10(3), pages 313-337, September.
    3. Mario Guajardo & Kurt Jörnsten & Mikael Rönnqvist, 2016. "Constructive and blocking power in collaborative transportation," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 38(1), pages 25-50, January.
    4. Gerard Llobet & Javier Suarez, 2010. "Entrepreneurial Innovation, Patent Protection and Industry Dynamics," Working Papers wp2010_1001, CEMFI.
    5. Jihui Chen & Qiang Fu, 2017. "Do exclusivity arrangements harm consumers?," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 311-339, June.
    6. Dinah Rosenberg & Eilon Solan & Nicolas Vieille, 2009. "Protocols with No Acknowledgment," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(4), pages 905-915, August.
    7. Tristan Tomala, 2011. "Fault Reporting in Partially Known Networks and Folk Theorems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(3), pages 754-763, June.
    8. Sen, Debapriya & Tauman, Yair, 2007. "General licensing schemes for a cost-reducing innovation," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 59(1), pages 163-186, April.
    9. José-Manuel Giménez-Gómez & António Osório & Josep E. Peris, 2015. "From Bargaining Solutions to Claims Rules: A Proportional Approach," Games, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-7, March.
    10. Ünsal Özdilek, 2020. "Land and building separation based on Shapley values," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 6(1), pages 1-13, December.
    11. Hiroki Saitoh & Shigehiro Serizawa, 2008. "Vickrey allocation rule with income effect," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 35(2), pages 391-401, May.
    12. van Damme, E.E.C., 2005. "Morgenstern, Oskar," Other publications TiSEM 5ce5c96d-c8d9-4a9c-8399-a, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    13. Eső, Péter & Wallace, Chris, 2013. "Meggyőzés és megegyezés egy dinamikus alkujátékban [Persuasion and settlement in a dynamic bargaining game]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(9), pages 930-939.
    14. Ken-Ichi Shimomura & Jacques-François Thisse, 2012. "Competition among the big and the small," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 43(2), pages 329-347, June.
    15. Andrea Pierce & Debapriya Sen, 2014. "Outsourcing versus technology transfer: Hotelling meets Stackelberg," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 111(3), pages 263-287, April.
    16. Anne van den Nouweland, 2011. "Comments on: Cooperative games and cost allocation problems," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 19(1), pages 29-32, July.
    17. Montero, M.P., 2002. "Two-Stage Bargaining with Reversible Coalitions : The Case of Apex Games," Other publications TiSEM 7dba0283-bc13-4f2c-8f5e-5, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    18. Yehuda Levy, 2013. "A Cantor Set of Games with No Shift-Homogeneous Equilibrium Selection," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 38(3), pages 492-503, August.
    19. Salomon, Antoine & Forges, Françoise, 2015. "Bayesian repeated games and reputation," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 159(PA), pages 70-104.
    20. Stéphane Gonzalez & Michel Grabisch, 2015. "Autonomous coalitions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 235(1), pages 301-317, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Statistical and Nonlinear Physics;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:eurphb:v:92:y:2019:i:10:d:10.1140_epjb_e2019-100225-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.