IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/eurjdp/v6y2018i3d10.1007_s40070-018-0087-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A practical application approach to argumentation for multicriteria analysis and decision support

Author

Listed:
  • Rallou Thomopoulos

    (INRA Iate/INRIA GraphIK)

Abstract

This paper explores, through an application example, connections between argumentation and another type of methods often involved in decision problems, namely, multicriteria analysis. A novel argumentative analysis framework is proposed and applied to assess a short supply chain device for food aid, regarding different categories of criteria. The analysis leads to some feedback concerning argumentation systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Rallou Thomopoulos, 2018. "A practical application approach to argumentation for multicriteria analysis and decision support," EURO Journal on Decision Processes, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 6(3), pages 237-255, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:eurjdp:v:6:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s40070-018-0087-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s40070-018-0087-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40070-018-0087-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40070-018-0087-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jasmin Tremblay & Irène Abi-Zeid, 2016. "Value-based argumentation for policy decision analysis: methodology and an exploratory case study of a hydroelectric project in Québec," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 236(1), pages 233-253, January.
    2. Jasmin Tremblay & Irène Abi-Zeid, 2016. "Value-based argumentation for policy decision analysis: methodology and an exploratory case study of a hydroelectric project in Québec," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 236(1), pages 233-253, January.
    3. Nikos Karanikolas & Pierre Bisquert & Patrice Buche & Christos Kaklamanis & Rallou Thomopoulos, 2018. "A Decision Support Tool for Agricultural Applications Based on Computational Social Choice and Argumentation," International Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Information Systems (IJAEIS), IGI Global, vol. 9(3), pages 54-73, July.
    4. Rallou Thomopoulos & Bernard Moulin & Laurent Bedoussac, 2018. "Supporting Decision for Environment-Friendly Practices in the Agri-Food Sector: When Argumentation and System Dynamics Simulation Complete Each Other," International Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Information Systems (IJAEIS), IGI Global, vol. 9(3), pages 1-21, July.
    5. Jarke, Matthias & Jelassi, M. Tawfik & Shakun, Melvin F., 1987. ": Towards a negotiation support system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 314-334, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maria Franca Norese & Diana Rolando & Rocco Curto, 2023. "DIKEDOC: a multicriteria methodology to organise and communicate knowledge," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 325(2), pages 1049-1082, June.
    2. Benjamin Delhomme & Franck Taillandier & Irène Abi-Zeid & Rallou Thomopoulos & Cédric Baudrit & Laurent Mora, 2017. "Designing an argumentative decision-aiding tool for urban planning. AIPA : an interface between multicriteria decision aiding and argumentative frameworks," Post-Print hal-01837517, HAL.
    3. Melvin F. Shakun, 1999. "An ESD Computer Culture for Intercultural Problem Solving and Negotiation," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 8(3), pages 237-249, May.
    4. Van den Honert, R. C. & Lootsma, F. A., 2000. "Assessing the quality of negotiated proposals using the REMBRANDT system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 120(1), pages 162-173, January.
    5. Mareike Schoop, 2021. "Negotiation communication revisited," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 29(1), pages 163-176, March.
    6. Salo, Ahti A., 1995. "Interactive decision aiding for group decision support," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 84(1), pages 134-149, July.
    7. Teich, Jeffrey E. & Wallenius, Hannele & Kuula, Markku & Zionts, Stanley, 1995. "A decision support approach for negotiation with an application to agricultural income policy negotiations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 81(1), pages 76-87, February.
    8. Schilling, Martin S. & Mulford, Matthew, 2007. "In search of value-for-money in collective bargaining: an analytic-interactive mediation process," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 22694, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    9. Athanasios Spyridakos & Denis Yannacopoulos, 2015. "Incorporating collective functions to multicriteria disaggregation–aggregation approaches for small group decision making," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 227(1), pages 119-136, April.
    10. Antonio Jiménez & Alfonso Mateos & Sixto Ríos-Insua, 2005. "Monte Carlo Simulation Techniques in a Decision Support System for Group Decision Making," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 109-130, March.
    11. Chaib, Romy Lynn & Macombe, Catherine & Thomopoulos, Rallou, 2022. "Adapting a participatory modelling method to forecast food system scenarios: a case study on the pork value-chain," Economia agro-alimentare / Food Economy, Italian Society of Agri-food Economics/Società Italiana di Economia Agro-Alimentare (SIEA), vol. 24(3), December.
    12. Romy Lynn Chaib & Catherine Macombe & Rallou Thomopoulos, 2022. "Adapting a participatory modelling method to forecast food system scenarios: a case study on the pork value-chain," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 24(3), pages 1-37.
    13. Ofir Turel & Yufei Yuan & Joe Rose, 2007. "Antecedents of attitude towards online mediation," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 16(6), pages 539-552, November.
    14. Dorota Górecka & Ewa Roszkowska & Tomasz Wachowicz, 2016. "The MARS Approach in the Verbal and Holistic Evaluation of the Negotiation Template," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 25(6), pages 1097-1136, November.
    15. Gregory E. Kersten & Wojtek Michalowski & David Cray & Ian Lee, 1991. "An analytic basis for decision support in negotiations," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(5), pages 743-761, October.
    16. Angur, Madhukar G. & Lotfi, Vahid & Sarkis, Joseph, 1996. "A hybrid conjoint measurement and bi-criteria model for a two group negotiation problem," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 195-206, September.
    17. Karacapilidis, Nikos I. & Pappis, Costas P., 1997. "A framework for group decision support systems: Combining AI tools and OR techniques," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 103(2), pages 373-388, December.
    18. Robert Davison & Mark Fuller & Andrew Hardin, 2003. "E-Consulting in Virtual Negotiations," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 12(6), pages 517-535, November.
    19. Mareike Schoop & Marije Amelsvoort & Johannes Gettinger & Michael Koerner & Sabine T. Koeszegi & Per Wijst, 2014. "The Interplay of Communication and Decisions in Electronic Negotiations: Communicative Decisions or Decisive Communication?," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 167-192, March.
    20. Saeedi, Masoud H. & Sillince, John A. A., 2001. "Issues of feasibility, coherence, and robustness in a premise-to-claim model of argumentation: Results from four experiments," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 133(1), pages 94-119, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:eurjdp:v:6:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s40070-018-0087-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.