IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/eujoag/v19y2022i1d10.1007_s10433-021-00620-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cardiovascular risk profiles and 20-year mortality in older people: gender differences in the Pro.V.A. study

Author

Listed:
  • Caterina Trevisan

    (University of Padova)

  • Giulia Capodaglio

    (Epidemiological System of the Veneto Region)

  • Eliana Ferroni

    (Epidemiological System of the Veneto Region)

  • Ugo Fedeli

    (Epidemiological System of the Veneto Region)

  • Marianna Noale

    (Neuroscience Institute)

  • Giovannella Baggio

    (Italian Center for the Studies on Gender Health and Medicine)

  • Enzo Manzato

    (University of Padova
    Neuroscience Institute)

  • Stefania Maggi

    (Neuroscience Institute)

  • Maria Chiara Corti

    (Epidemiological System of the Veneto Region
    AGENAS, National Agency for Regional Health Services, National Outcome Program)

  • Giuseppe Sergi

    (University of Padova)

Abstract

The age- and gender-related cardio-metabolic changes may limit the applicability of guidelines for the prevention of cardiovascular diseases (CVD) in older people. We investigated the association of cardiovascular risk profile with 20-year all-cause and CVD-mortality in older adults, focusing on age- and gender-specific differences. This prospective study involved 2895 community-dwelling individuals aged ≥65 years who participated in the Pro.V.A study. The sum of achieved target levels (smoking, diet, physical activity, body weight, blood pressure, lipids, and diabetes) recommended by the European Society of Cardiology 2016 guidelines was assessed in each participant. From this sum, cardiovascular risk profile was categorised as very high (0–2), high (3), medium (4), low (5), and very low (6–7 target levels achieved). All-cause and CV mortality data over 20 years were obtained from health registers. At Cox regression, lower cardiovascular risk profile was associated with reduced 20-year all-cause mortality in both genders, with stronger results for women (HR = 0.42 [95%CI:0.25–0.69] and HR = 0.61 [95%CI:0.42–0.89] for very low vs. very high cardiovascular risk profile in women and men, respectively). This trend was more marked for CVD mortality. Lower cardiovascular risk profile was associated with reduced all-cause and CVD mortality only in men

Suggested Citation

  • Caterina Trevisan & Giulia Capodaglio & Eliana Ferroni & Ugo Fedeli & Marianna Noale & Giovannella Baggio & Enzo Manzato & Stefania Maggi & Maria Chiara Corti & Giuseppe Sergi, 2022. "Cardiovascular risk profiles and 20-year mortality in older people: gender differences in the Pro.V.A. study," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 37-47, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:eujoag:v:19:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s10433-021-00620-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s10433-021-00620-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10433-021-00620-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10433-021-00620-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ford, E.S. & Zhao, G. & Tsai, J. & Li, C., 2011. "Low-Risk lifestyle behaviors and all-cause mortality: Findings from the national health and nutrition examination survey III mortality study," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 101(10), pages 1922-1929.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lindsay C. Kobayashi & Sarah Frank & Carlos Riumallo-Herl & David Canning & Lisa Berkman, 2019. "Socioeconomic gradients in chronic disease risk behaviors in a population-based study of older adults in rural South Africa," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 64(1), pages 135-145, January.
    2. Hagger, Martin S. & Polet, Juho & Lintunen, Taru, 2018. "The reasoned action approach applied to health behavior: Role of past behavior and tests of some key moderators using meta-analytic structural equation modeling," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 85-94.
    3. Sarah R. Dash & Erin Hoare & Pia Varsamis & Garry L. R. Jennings & Bronwyn A. Kingwell, 2019. "Sex-Specific Lifestyle and Biomedical Risk Factors for Chronic Disease among Early-Middle, Middle and Older Aged Australian Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-13, January.
    4. Regina Frei & Sarah R Haile & Margot Mutsch & Sabine Rohrmann, 2015. "Relationship of Serum Vitamin D Concentrations and Allostatic Load as a Measure of Cumulative Biological Risk among the US Population: A Cross-Sectional Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(10), pages 1-17, October.
    5. Mahdi Vajdi & Leila Nikniaz & Asghar Mohammad Pour Asl & Mahdieh Abbasalizad Farhangi, 2020. "Lifestyle patterns and their nutritional, socio-demographic and psychological determinants in a community-based study: A mixed approach of latent class and factor analyses," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-16, July.
    6. Needham, Belinda L. & Adler, Nancy & Gregorich, Steven & Rehkopf, David & Lin, Jue & Blackburn, Elizabeth H. & Epel, Elissa S., 2013. "Socioeconomic status, health behavior, and leukocyte telomere length in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999–2002," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 1-8.
    7. Tetyana Pudrovska & Benedicta Anikputa, 2014. "Editor's choice Early-Life Socioeconomic Status and Mortality in Later Life: An Integration of Four Life-Course Mechanisms," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 69(3), pages 451-460.
    8. Gong, Jie & Lu, Yi & Xie, Huihua, 2020. "The average and distributional effects of teenage adversity on long-term health," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    9. Inhwan Lee & Shinuk Kim & Hyunsik Kang, 2019. "Lifestyle Risk Factors and All-Cause and Cardiovascular Disease Mortality: Data from the Korean Longitudinal Study of Aging," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-11, August.
    10. Rongrong Zhang & Song Liu & Ming Li & Xiong He & Chunshan Zhou, 2021. "The Effect of High-Density Built Environments on Elderly Individuals’ Physical Health: A Cross-Sectional Study in Guangzhou, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-22, September.
    11. Rufi Shaikh & Junaid Khan, 2021. "Clustering of lifestyle risk factors among adult population in India: A cross-sectional analysis from 2005 to 2016," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(1), pages 1-13, January.
    12. Bich Tran & Michael O Falster & Kirsty Douglas & Fiona Blyth & Louisa R Jorm, 2014. "Health Behaviours and Potentially Preventable Hospitalisation: A Prospective Study of Older Australian Adults," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(4), pages 1-9, April.
    13. Huoyun, Zhu & Shilong, Ma & Zhaoqi, Li & Huiqin, Xia, 2023. "Early socioeconomic status, social mobility and cognitive trajectories in later life: A life course perspective," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    14. Ulrich John & Monika Hanke & Jennis Freyer-Adam, 2018. "Health Risk Behavior Patterns in a National Adult Population Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-12, April.
    15. Michael McCrea & Mark Farrell, 2018. "A Conceptual Model for Pricing Health and Life Insurance Using Wearable Technology," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 21(3), pages 389-411, December.
    16. Kathleen E. Burns & Ashok Chaurasia & Valerie Carson & Scott T. Leatherdale, 2021. "Examining If Changes in the Type of School-Based Intramural Programs Affect Youth Physical Activity over Time: A Natural Experiment Evaluation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-14, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:eujoag:v:19:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s10433-021-00620-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.