IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envsyd/v33y2013i3d10.1007_s10669-013-9452-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Collective risk management: insights and opportunities for DoD decision-makers

Author

Listed:
  • Igor Linkov

    (US Army Engineer Research and Development Center)

  • Matthew D. Wood

    (US Army Engineer Research and Development Center)

  • Renae Ditmer

    (STRATCON LLC)

  • Anthony Cox

    (Cox Associates Consulting)

  • Robert Ross

    (Department of Homeland Security Science and Technology Directorate)

Abstract

Individuals make decisions every day in group contexts which vary in size, structure, and purpose. The US Department of Defense (DoD) is a large organization composed of many groups, and like many organizations, it has a vested interest in improving the performance of its affiliated groups, especially as it concerns risk-informed decision-making. This article discusses current foibles and considerations for decision-making in DoD groups as identified through a workshop with experts in risk-informed decision-making, cognitive science, and military operations. Experts noted that terms associated with risk-informed decision-making were often misconstrued, that formal decision-making frameworks are underutilized, and that many considerations should be taken into account when attempting to improve decision-making performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Igor Linkov & Matthew D. Wood & Renae Ditmer & Anthony Cox & Robert Ross, 2013. "Collective risk management: insights and opportunities for DoD decision-makers," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 335-340, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:envsyd:v:33:y:2013:i:3:d:10.1007_s10669-013-9452-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s10669-013-9452-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10669-013-9452-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10669-013-9452-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Igor Linkov & Susan Cormier & Joshua Gold & F. Kyle Satterstrom & Todd Bridges, 2012. "Using Our Brains to Develop Better Policy," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(3), pages 374-380, March.
    2. Matthew Wood & Daniel Kovacs & Ann Bostrom & Todd Bridges & Igor Linkov, 2012. "Flood Risk Management: US Army Corps of Engineers and Layperson Perceptions," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(8), pages 1349-1368, August.
    3. Igor Linkov & Paul Welle & Drew Loney & Alex Tkachuk & Laure Canis & J. B. Kim & Todd Bridges, 2011. "Use of Multicriteria Decision Analysis to Support Weight of Evidence Evaluation," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(8), pages 1211-1225, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Peter A. Beling, 2013. "Multi-scale decision making: challenges in engineering and environmental systems," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 323-325, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rebecca E. Morss & Julie L. Demuth & Ann Bostrom & Jeffrey K. Lazo & Heather Lazrus, 2015. "Flash Flood Risks and Warning Decisions: A Mental Models Study of Forecasters, Public Officials, and Media Broadcasters in Boulder, Colorado," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(11), pages 2009-2028, November.
    2. Denys Yemshanov & Frank H. Koch & Yakov Ben‐Haim & Marla Downing & Frank Sapio & Marty Siltanen, 2013. "A New Multicriteria Risk Mapping Approach Based on a Multiattribute Frontier Concept," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(9), pages 1694-1709, September.
    3. Fernando Reboredo, 2013. "Socio-economic, environmental, and governance impacts of illegal logging," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 295-304, June.
    4. Adiel Teixeira Almeida & Eduarda Asfora Frej & Lucia Reis Peixoto Roselli, 2021. "Combining holistic and decomposition paradigms in preference modeling with the flexibility of FITradeoff," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 29(1), pages 7-47, March.
    5. Matthew D. Wood & Kenton Plourde & Sabrina Larkin & Peter P. Egeghy & Antony J. Williams & Valerie Zemba & Igor Linkov & Daniel A. Vallero, 2020. "Advances on a Decision Analytic Approach to Exposure‐Based Chemical Prioritization," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(1), pages 83-96, January.
    6. John Hamer Powell & Michael Hammond & Albert Chen & Navonil Mustafee, 2018. "Human Agency in Disaster Planning: A Systems Approach," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(7), pages 1422-1443, July.
    7. Jing Shi & Vivianne H. M. Visschers & Michael Siegrist, 2015. "Public Perception of Climate Change: The Importance of Knowledge and Cultural Worldviews," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(12), pages 2183-2201, December.
    8. Lucia Reis Peixoto Roselli & Adiel Teixeira Almeida, 2022. "Use of the Alpha-Theta Diagram as a decision neuroscience tool for analyzing holistic evaluation in decision making," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 312(2), pages 1197-1219, May.
    9. Vicki Bier, 2020. "The Role of Decision Analysis in Risk Analysis: A Retrospective," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(S1), pages 2207-2217, November.
    10. Henner Gimpel & Dominikus Kleindienst & Daniela Waldmann, 2018. "The disclosure of private data: measuring the privacy paradox in digital services," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 28(4), pages 475-490, November.
    11. Heather Lazrus & Rebecca E. Morss & Julie L. Demuth & Jeffrey K. Lazo & Ann Bostrom, 2016. "“Know What to Do If You Encounter a Flash Flood”: Mental Models Analysis for Improving Flash Flood Risk Communication and Public Decision Making," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(2), pages 411-427, February.
    12. Matteo Convertino & L James Valverde Jr, 2013. "Portfolio Decision Analysis Framework for Value-Focused Ecosystem Management," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(6), pages 1-14, June.
    13. Mandy Pui & Anne-Marie Nicol & Michael Brauer & Farshad Palad & Christopher Carlsten, 2017. "A qualitative study of the knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of people exposed to diesel exhaust at the workplace in British Columbia, Canada," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(8), pages 1-21, August.
    14. Jaana Sorvari & Eija Schultz & Jari Haimi, 2013. "Assessment of Ecological Risks at Former Landfill Site Using TRIAD Procedure and Multicriteria Analysis," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(2), pages 203-219, February.
    15. Roland W. Scholz, 2017. "Managing complexity: from visual perception to sustainable transitions—contributions of Brunswik’s Theory of Probabilistic Functionalism," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 37(4), pages 381-409, December.
    16. Michael Siegrist, 2013. "The Necessity for Longitudinal Studies in Risk Perception Research," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(1), pages 50-51, January.
    17. Floris Abrams & Lucas Hendrickx & Catrinel Turcanu & Lieve Sweeck & Jos Van Orshoven, 2024. "Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis to Support the Remediation of Polluted Soils: A Review of Case Studies," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-21, June.
    18. Randall Lutter & Linda Abbott & Rick Becker & Chris Borgert & Ann Bradley & Gail Charnley & Susan Dudley & Alan Felsot & Nancy Golden & George Gray & Daland Juberg & Mary Mitchell & Nancy Rachman & Lo, 2015. "Improving Weight of Evidence Approaches to Chemical Evaluations," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(2), pages 186-192, February.
    19. Steven Duret & Hong‐Minh Hoang & Evelyne Derens‐Bertheau & Anthony Delahaye & Onrawee Laguerre & Laurent Guillier, 2019. "Combining Quantitative Risk Assessment of Human Health, Food Waste, and Energy Consumption: The Next Step in the Development of the Food Cold Chain?," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(4), pages 906-925, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envsyd:v:33:y:2013:i:3:d:10.1007_s10669-013-9452-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.