IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v26y2024i9d10.1007_s10668-023-03590-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Livelihood vulnerability assessment of land-lost farmers in the context of tourism and the COVID-19 pandemic

Author

Listed:
  • Wenyue Tang

    (Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics)

  • Qianguang Wang

    (Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics)

  • Hao Cheng

    (Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics)

  • Taohong Liu

    (Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics)

  • Jianmin Wan

    (Jiangxi Normal University)

Abstract

To facilitate natural heritage protection, ecological protection, and tourism development, farmers in natural heritage tourist destinations are often relocated and resettled, thus becoming land-lost farmers. Because of the COVID-19 pandemic, the livelihood vulnerability of land-lost farmers in natural heritage tourist destinations has become particularly prominent. In this paper, the Yinhuwan resettlement community in China’s Mount Sanqingshan Scenic Area is taken as an example and changes in stock and livelihood capital structure of farmers after relocation are analyzed. Based on the “exposure-sensitivity-adaptability” framework, an evaluation index system of farmers’ livelihood vulnerability is constructed to evaluate farmers’ livelihood vulnerability. The multiple linear regression model is used to empirically analyze the influencing factors of livelihood vulnerability. The results show: (1) Relocation and resettlement induced considerable changes to the livelihood of farmers. After relocation, the livelihood capital of farmers has generally increased. The physical capital and financial capital of farmers increased significantly, while natural capital was replaced by tourism capital. This led to a decrease in human capital of farmers compared with tourism operations. (2) The COVID-19 pandemic has greatly impacted the livelihood of farmers in this resettlement community. (3) Under the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic, the livelihood vulnerability of the main Nongjiale operators has become relatively high, while that of part-time Nongjiale operators and non-Nongjiale operators is moderate. (4) Tourism capital, tourism market seasonality, and livelihood diversification are significant factors influencing the livelihood vulnerability of farmers in this resettlement community. In this paper, the original natural capital is replaced with tourism capital, and a new analysis framework of livelihood capital is constructed. This provides a reference for future research on the livelihood of farmers in tourist destinations. This reference helps to study the sustainability of the livelihoods of land-lost farmers, and to evaluate the feasibility of the resettlement policy of farmers in tourist destinations. Several suggestions are presented that provide a basis for the formulation of relevant policies for reducing farmers’ livelihood vulnerability.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenyue Tang & Qianguang Wang & Hao Cheng & Taohong Liu & Jianmin Wan, 2024. "Livelihood vulnerability assessment of land-lost farmers in the context of tourism and the COVID-19 pandemic," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(9), pages 23059-23083, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:26:y:2024:i:9:d:10.1007_s10668-023-03590-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-023-03590-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-023-03590-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-023-03590-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:26:y:2024:i:9:d:10.1007_s10668-023-03590-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.