IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v26y2024i8d10.1007_s10668-023-03432-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of remote sensing techniques-based water quality monitoring for sustainable hydrological applications: an integrated FWZIC-VIKOR modelling approach

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammed Talal

    (Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM))

  • A. H. Alamoodi

    (Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris (UPSI))

  • O. S. Albahri

    (La Trobe University
    Mazaya University College)

  • A. S. Albahri

    (Iraqi Commission for Computers and Informatics (ICCI))

  • Dragan Pamucar

    (University of Belgrade
    Yuan Ze University)

Abstract

Evaluating remote sensing techniques (RST)-based water quality monitoring systems in hydrological applications is a complex multi-attribute decision-making (MADM) problem due to several integrated issues. These issues include the need to consider 15 evaluation criteria, the importance of these criteria in relation to their application and network infrastructure, data variation, and trade-offs and conflicts between them. Therefore, this study proposes an MADM integrated modelling approach to weight these criteria and rank the selected RSTs using the “Fuzzy Weighted with Zero Inconsistency” (FWZIC) method coupled with the “Vlse-kriterijumska Optimizcija I Kaompromisno Resenje” (VIKOR) method. First, a decision matrix was developed for the evaluation criteria and their intersection with various RSTs in different network categories. Next, the assessment criteria were weighted using FWZIC, followed by ranking the RSTs for each category using VIKOR. The findings reveal that the criteria weighting varied across categories, as assigned by specialists-based FWZIC. For example, the “data acquisition system complexity” criterion received the maximum weight (w = 0.081) for mesh-based sensing and the lowest (w = 0.057) for cellular-based sensing. Using the obtained weights and based on the ascending order of the performance score value (Q), various RSTs were benchmarked using VIKOR. This includes (n = 22) RSTs in fixed star, (n = 8) RSTs in mesh sensing, (n = 6) RSTs in cellular sensing, (n = 3) RSTs in fixed cable sensing, and (n = 2) RSTs in movable sensing. Finally, the evaluation process for the benchmarked RSTs involved systematic ranking, sensitivity analysis, and comparison analysis, which confirmed the robustness of the proposed approach across all RST categories.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammed Talal & A. H. Alamoodi & O. S. Albahri & A. S. Albahri & Dragan Pamucar, 2024. "Evaluation of remote sensing techniques-based water quality monitoring for sustainable hydrological applications: an integrated FWZIC-VIKOR modelling approach," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(8), pages 19685-19729, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:26:y:2024:i:8:d:10.1007_s10668-023-03432-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-023-03432-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-023-03432-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-023-03432-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sarah Najm Abdulwahid & Moamin A. Mahmoud & Bilal Bahaa Zaidan & Abdullah Hussein Alamoodi & Salem Garfan & Mohammed Talal & Aws Alaa Zaidan, 2022. "A Comprehensive Review on the Behaviour of Motorcyclists: Motivations, Issues, Challenges, Substantial Analysis and Recommendations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-38, March.
    2. Zamani-Sabzi, Hamed & King, James Phillip & Gard, Charlotte C. & Abudu, Shalamu, 2016. "Statistical and analytical comparison of multi-criteria decision-making techniques under fuzzy environment," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 3(C), pages 92-117.
    3. Betul Yagmahan & Hilal Yılmaz, 2023. "An integrated ranking approach based on group multi-criteria decision making and sensitivity analysis to evaluate charging stations under sustainability," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 96-121, January.
    4. Li Ling & Ran Anping & Xu Di, 2023. "Proposal of a hybrid decision-making framework for the prioritization of express packaging recycling patterns," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 2610-2647, March.
    5. Karrar Hameed Abdulkareem & Nureize Arbaiy & A. A. Zaidan & B. B. Zaidan & O. S. Albahri & M. A. Alsalem & Mahmood M. Salih, 2020. "A Novel Multi-Perspective Benchmarking Framework for Selecting Image Dehazing Intelligent Algorithms Based on BWM and Group VIKOR Techniques," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(03), pages 909-957, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abbas Roozbahani & Ebrahim Ebrahimi & Mohammad Ebrahim Banihabib, 2018. "A Framework for Ground Water Management Based on Bayesian Network and MCDM Techniques," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 32(15), pages 4985-5005, December.
    2. Umut Asan & Ayberk Soyer, 2022. "A Weighted Bonferroni-OWA Operator Based Cumulative Belief Degree Approach to Personnel Selection Based on Automated Video Interview Assessment Data," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-33, May.
    3. Mahmood M. Salih & O. S. Albahri & A. A. Zaidan & B. B. Zaidan & F. M. Jumaah & A. S. Albahri, 2021. "Benchmarking of AQM methods of network congestion control based on extension of interval type-2 trapezoidal fuzzy decision by opinion score method," Telecommunication Systems: Modelling, Analysis, Design and Management, Springer, vol. 77(3), pages 493-522, July.
    4. Francesco Ciardiello & Andrea Genovese, 2023. "A comparison between TOPSIS and SAW methods," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 325(2), pages 967-994, June.
    5. Marija Ferko & Dario Babić & Darko Babić & Ali Pirdavani & Marko Ševrović & Marijan Jakovljević & Grgo Luburić, 2022. "Influence of Road Safety Barriers on the Severity of Motorcyclist Injuries in Horizontal Curves," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-15, November.
    6. Khalid Aljohani & Russell G. Thompson, 2018. "A Stakeholder-Based Evaluation of the Most Suitable and Sustainable Delivery Fleet for Freight Consolidation Policies in the Inner-City Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-27, December.
    7. Yolandi Schoeman & Paul Oberholster & Vernon Somerset, 2021. "A Zero-Waste Multi-Criteria Decision-Support Model for the Iron and Steel Industry in Developing Countries: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-23, March.
    8. Albahri, A.S. & Alnoor, Alhamzah & Zaidan, A.A. & Albahri, O.S. & Hameed, Hamsa & Zaidan, B.B. & Peh, S.S. & Zain, A.B. & Siraj, S.B. & Alamoodi, A.H. & Yass, A.A., 2021. "Based on the multi-assessment model: Towards a new context of combining the artificial neural network and structural equation modelling: A review," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 153(P1).
    9. Jose Martino Neto & Valerio Antonio Pamplona Salomon & Miguel Angel Ortiz-Barrios & Antonella Petrillo, 2023. "Compatibility and correlation of multi-attribute decision making: a case of industrial relocation," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 326(2), pages 831-852, July.
    10. Noor S. Baqer & A. S. Albahri & Hussein A. Mohammed & A. A. Zaidan & Rula A. Amjed & Abbas M. Al-Bakry & O. S. Albahri & H. A. Alsattar & Alhamzah Alnoor & A. H. Alamoodi & B. B. Zaidan & R. Q. Malik , 2022. "Indoor air quality pollutants predicting approach using unified labelling process-based multi-criteria decision making and machine learning techniques," Telecommunication Systems: Modelling, Analysis, Design and Management, Springer, vol. 81(4), pages 591-613, December.
    11. James, Ajith Tom & Kumar, Girish & Tayal, Pushpal & Chauhan, Ashwin & Wadhawa, Chirag & Panchal, Jasmin, 2022. "Analysis of human resource management challenges in implementation of industry 4.0 in Indian automobile industry," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    12. Akshay Hinduja & Manju Pandey, 2023. "Analysis and Comparison of State-of-the-Art Fuzzy Multi-criteria Decision-making Methods Under Different Levels of Uncertainty," Vision, , vol. 27(1), pages 93-109, February.
    13. C. Veeramani & R. Venugopal & S. Muruganandan, 2023. "An Exploration of the Fuzzy Inference System for the Daily Trading Decision and Its Performance Analysis Based on Fuzzy MCDM Methods," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 62(3), pages 1313-1340, October.
    14. Eduardo Fernandez & Jorge Navarro & Rafael Olmedo, 2018. "Characterization of the Effectiveness of Several Outranking-Based Multi-Criteria Sorting Methods," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(04), pages 1047-1084, July.
    15. Alizadeh, Reza & Soltanisehat, Leili & Lund, Peter D. & Zamanisabzi, Hamed, 2020. "Improving renewable energy policy planning and decision-making through a hybrid MCDM method," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    16. R. N. Ossei-Bremang & F. Kemausuor, 2021. "A decision support system for the selection of sustainable biomass resources for bioenergy production," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 437-454, September.
    17. Zhao, Hui & Hao, Xiang, 2024. "Location decision of electric vehicle charging station based on a novel grey correlation comprehensive evaluation multi-criteria decision method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).
    18. Sarah Najm Abdulwahid & Moamin A. Mahmoud & Nazrita Ibrahim & Bilal Bahaa Zaidan & Hussein Ali Ameen, 2022. "Modeling Motorcyclists’ Aggressive Driving Behavior Using Computational and Statistical Analysis of Real-Time Driving Data to Improve Road Safety and Reduce Accidents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-20, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:26:y:2024:i:8:d:10.1007_s10668-023-03432-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.