IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wsi/ijitdm/v19y2020i03ns0219622020500169.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Novel Multi-Perspective Benchmarking Framework for Selecting Image Dehazing Intelligent Algorithms Based on BWM and Group VIKOR Techniques

Author

Listed:
  • Karrar Hameed Abdulkareem

    (Department of Computing, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Tanjong Malim, Perak, Malaysia†Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, 86400 Batu Pahat, Johor, Malaysia)

  • Nureize Arbaiy

    (Department of Computing, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Tanjong Malim, Perak, Malaysia)

  • A. A. Zaidan

    (#x2021;College of Agriculture, Al-Muthanna University, Samawah 66001, Iraq)

  • B. B. Zaidan

    (#x2021;College of Agriculture, Al-Muthanna University, Samawah 66001, Iraq)

  • O. S. Albahri

    (#x2021;College of Agriculture, Al-Muthanna University, Samawah 66001, Iraq)

  • M. A. Alsalem

    (#xA7;College of Administration and Economic, University of Mosul, Mosul, Iraq)

  • Mahmood M. Salih

    (#xB6;Department of Computer Science, Computer Science and Mathematics College, Tikrit University, Tikrit 34001, Iraq)

Abstract

The increasing demand for image dehazing-based applications has raised the value of efficient evaluation and benchmarking for image dehazing algorithms. Several perspectives, such as inhomogeneous foggy, homogenous foggy, and dark foggy scenes, have been considered in multi-criteria evaluation. The benchmarking for the selection of the best image dehazing intelligent algorithm based on multi-criteria perspectives is a challenging task owing to (a) multiple evaluation criteria, (b) criteria importance, (c) data variation, (d) criteria conflict, and (e) criteria tradeoff. A generally accepted framework for benchmarking image dehazing performance is unavailable in the existing literature. This study proposes a novel multi-perspective (i.e., an inhomogeneous foggy scene, a homogenous foggy scene, and a dark foggy scene) benchmarking framework for the selection of the best image dehazing intelligent algorithm based on multi-criteria analysis. Experiments were conducted in three stages. First was an evaluation experiment with five algorithms as part of matrix data. Second was a crossover between image dehazing intelligent algorithms and a set of target evaluation criteria to obtain matrix data. Third was the ranking of the image dehazing intelligent algorithms through integrated best–worst and VIseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje methods. Individual and group decision-making contexts were applied to demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed framework. The mean was used to objectively validate the ranks given by group decision-making contexts. Checklist and benchmarking scenarios were provided to compare the proposed framework with an existing benchmark study. The proposed framework achieved a significant result in terms of selecting the best image dehazing algorithm.

Suggested Citation

  • Karrar Hameed Abdulkareem & Nureize Arbaiy & A. A. Zaidan & B. B. Zaidan & O. S. Albahri & M. A. Alsalem & Mahmood M. Salih, 2020. "A Novel Multi-Perspective Benchmarking Framework for Selecting Image Dehazing Intelligent Algorithms Based on BWM and Group VIKOR Techniques," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(03), pages 909-957, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:wsi:ijitdm:v:19:y:2020:i:03:n:s0219622020500169
    DOI: 10.1142/S0219622020500169
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0219622020500169
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1142/S0219622020500169?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Albahri, A.S. & Alnoor, Alhamzah & Zaidan, A.A. & Albahri, O.S. & Hameed, Hamsa & Zaidan, B.B. & Peh, S.S. & Zain, A.B. & Siraj, S.B. & Alamoodi, A.H. & Yass, A.A., 2021. "Based on the multi-assessment model: Towards a new context of combining the artificial neural network and structural equation modelling: A review," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 153(P1).
    2. Mahmood M. Salih & O. S. Albahri & A. A. Zaidan & B. B. Zaidan & F. M. Jumaah & A. S. Albahri, 2021. "Benchmarking of AQM methods of network congestion control based on extension of interval type-2 trapezoidal fuzzy decision by opinion score method," Telecommunication Systems: Modelling, Analysis, Design and Management, Springer, vol. 77(3), pages 493-522, July.
    3. Noor S. Baqer & A. S. Albahri & Hussein A. Mohammed & A. A. Zaidan & Rula A. Amjed & Abbas M. Al-Bakry & O. S. Albahri & H. A. Alsattar & Alhamzah Alnoor & A. H. Alamoodi & B. B. Zaidan & R. Q. Malik , 2022. "Indoor air quality pollutants predicting approach using unified labelling process-based multi-criteria decision making and machine learning techniques," Telecommunication Systems: Modelling, Analysis, Design and Management, Springer, vol. 81(4), pages 591-613, December.
    4. James, Ajith Tom & Kumar, Girish & Tayal, Pushpal & Chauhan, Ashwin & Wadhawa, Chirag & Panchal, Jasmin, 2022. "Analysis of human resource management challenges in implementation of industry 4.0 in Indian automobile industry," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:ijitdm:v:19:y:2020:i:03:n:s0219622020500169. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tai Tone Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.worldscinet.com/ijitdm/ijitdm.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.