IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v26y2024i10d10.1007_s10668-023-03720-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of ecologically clean small watersheds in the Yangtze river estuary area of China

Author

Listed:
  • Yiqing Sun

    (Hohai University
    Hohai University)

  • Zhenzhong Shen

    (Hohai University
    Hohai University)

  • Weihua Fang

    (Nanjing Automation Institute of Water Conservancy and Hydrology)

  • Jiaao Yu

    (Hohai University
    Hohai University)

  • Lei Gan

    (Hohai University)

  • Liqun Xu

    (Hohai University)

  • Runying Wang

    (Hohai University)

  • Hongwei Zhang

    (Hohai University
    Hohai University)

  • Ruiwen Liu

    (Hohai University)

  • Congcong Zhou

    (Hohai University
    Hohai University)

  • Zhangxin Huang

    (Hohai University
    Hohai University)

Abstract

Ecologically clean small watersheds are crucial for water and soil conservation in China and provide a basis for the comprehensive development and sustainable utilization of water resources. In this study, a model and evaluation system for ecologically clean small watersheds based on the AHP-fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method were proposed to evaluate the construction of such watersheds in the Yangtze river estuary area of China, using Changning district in Shanghai as a case study. The evaluation system includes four attribute layer indicators: water quality, soil and soil erosion, pollution, and water system, as well as 13 index layer indicators. The watersheds are evaluated as “excellent,” “good,” “medium,” or “poor.” The evaluation is carried out by assigning weights to the indicators, establishing the membership degree matrix, determining the fuzzy synthesis operator, and calculating the score of the comprehensive evaluation. The evaluation results were analyzed and discussed. The results show that the comprehensive evaluation score of ecologically clean small watershed construction in Changning district was found to be 83.28. Pollution control received an “excellent”-level score of 86.21, while water system management received a “poor”-level score of 57.49. Overall, the construction of ecologically clean small watersheds was evaluated as “good,” although some aspects still need improvement. The results of this study provide a basis for evaluating the construction of ecologically clean small watersheds in the Yangtze river estuary area.

Suggested Citation

  • Yiqing Sun & Zhenzhong Shen & Weihua Fang & Jiaao Yu & Lei Gan & Liqun Xu & Runying Wang & Hongwei Zhang & Ruiwen Liu & Congcong Zhou & Zhangxin Huang, 2024. "Evaluation of ecologically clean small watersheds in the Yangtze river estuary area of China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(10), pages 26147-26170, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:26:y:2024:i:10:d:10.1007_s10668-023-03720-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-023-03720-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-023-03720-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-023-03720-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Saowanee WIJITKOSUM, 2018. "Fuzzy AHP for drought risk assessment in Lam Ta Kong watershed, the north-eastern region of Thailand," Soil and Water Research, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 13(4), pages 218-225.
    2. Lucy Guimarães & Alessandra Magrini, 2008. "A Proposal of Indicators for Sustainable Development in the Management of River Basins," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 22(9), pages 1191-1202, September.
    3. R. Jaiswal & Narayan Ghosh & A. Lohani & T. Thomas, 2015. "Fuzzy AHP Based Multi Crteria Decision Support for Watershed Prioritization," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 29(12), pages 4205-4227, September.
    4. Saaty, Thomas L., 1990. "How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 9-26, September.
    5. C.-Y. Xu & V. Singh, 1998. "A Review on Monthly Water Balance Models for Water Resources Investigations," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 12(1), pages 20-50, February.
    6. Chang, Da-Yong, 1996. "Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(3), pages 649-655, December.
    7. Gerald Kauffman, 2015. "Governance, Policy, and Economics of Intergovernmental River Basin Management," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 29(15), pages 5689-5712, December.
    8. S. L. Razavi Toosi & J. M. V. Samani, 2017. "Prioritizing Watersheds Using a Novel Hybrid Decision Model Based on Fuzzy DEMATEL, Fuzzy ANP and Fuzzy VIKOR," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 31(9), pages 2853-2867, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Choudhary, Devendra & Shankar, Ravi, 2012. "An STEEP-fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS framework for evaluation and selection of thermal power plant location: A case study from India," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 510-521.
    2. Noori, Amir & Bonakdari, Hossein & Salimi, Amir Hossein & Gharabaghi, Bahram, 2021. "A group Multi-Criteria Decision-Making method for water supply choice optimization," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    3. Junxi Zhu & Chia-Liang Lin, 2024. "Research on Service Quality for China’s Ceramic Product Design Industry," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-27, September.
    4. Miodrag Čelebić & Dragoljub Bajić & Sanja Bajić & Mirjana Banković & Duško Torbica & Aleksej Milošević & Dejan Stevanović, 2024. "Development of an Integrated Model for Open-Pit-Mine Discontinuous Haulage System Optimization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-16, April.
    5. Panagiotis K. Marhavilas & Michael G. Tegas & Georgios K. Koulinas & Dimitrios E. Koulouriotis, 2020. "A Joint Stochastic/Deterministic Process with Multi-Objective Decision Making Risk-Assessment Framework for Sustainable Constructions Engineering Projects—A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-21, May.
    6. Shang, Delei & Yin, Guangzhi & Li, Xiaoshuang & Li, Yaoji & Jiang, Changbao & Kang, Xiangtao & Liu, Chao & Zhang, Chi, 2015. "Analysis for Green Mine (phosphate) performance of China: An evaluation index system," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(P2), pages 71-84.
    7. PrasannaVenkatesan, S. & Goh, M., 2016. "Multi-objective supplier selection and order allocation under disruption risk," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 124-142.
    8. Vicente Rodríguez Montequín & Joaquín Manuel Villanueva Balsera & Marina Díaz Piloñeta & César Álvarez Pérez, 2020. "A Bradley-Terry Model-Based Approach to Prioritize the Balance Scorecard Driving Factors: The Case Study of a Financial Software Factory," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-15, February.
    9. Badreya Gharib Khamis Mohammed Alblooshi & Syed Zamberi Ahmad & Matloub Hussain & Sanjay Kumar Singh, 2022. "Sustainable management of electronic waste: Empirical evidences from a stakeholders' perspective," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1856-1874, May.
    10. Muhammad Mohsin & Yin Hengbin & Zhang Luyao & Li Rui & Qian Chong & Ana Mehak, 2022. "An Application of Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis for Risk Prioritization and Management: A Case Study of the Fisheries Sector in Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-21, July.
    11. Nyimbili, Penjani Hopkins & Erden, Turan, 2020. "GIS-based fuzzy multi-criteria approach for optimal site selection of fire stations in Istanbul, Turkey," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    12. Dibyandu Roy & Anirban Dhar & Venkappayya R. Desai, 2024. "A grey fuzzy analytic hierarchy process-based flash flood vulnerability assessment in an ungauged Himalayan watershed," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(7), pages 18181-18206, July.
    13. Fang-Shii Ning & Kuang-Chang Pien & Wei-Jie Liou & Tsung-Chi Cheng, 2024. "Site Selection for Offshore Wind Power Farms with Natural Disaster Risk Assessment: A Case Study of the Waters off Taiwan’s West Coast," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-24, June.
    14. Chiung-Wen Hsu, 2014. "Key Factors and Recommendations for Adopting Renewable Energy Systems by Families and Firms," International Journal of Business and Economics, School of Management Development, Feng Chia University, Taichung, Taiwan, vol. 13(1), pages 39-58, June.
    15. Wanqiu Zhu & Jian Lu & Yunxuan Li & Yi Yang, 2019. "A Pick-Up Points Recommendation System for Ridesourcing Service," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-19, February.
    16. Song, Yongze & Thatcher, Dominique & Li, Qindong & McHugh, Tom & Wu, Peng, 2021. "Developing sustainable road infrastructure performance indicators using a model-driven fuzzy spatial multi-criteria decision making method," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    17. Chia-Liang Lin & Ching-Yun Hsu & Chu-Ho Ting, 2024. "Research on the Key Influencing Goals for Visual Design Sustainability: A Dual Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-28, February.
    18. Anagnostopoulos, K.P. & Petalas, C., 2011. "A fuzzy multicriteria benefit-cost approach for irrigation projects evaluation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(9), pages 1409-1416, July.
    19. Ezgi Güler & Süheyla Yerel Kandemir, 2024. "Analysis of PM 10 Substances via Intuitionistic Fuzzy Decision-Making and Statistical Evaluation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-23, September.
    20. Caprioli, Caterina & Bottero, Marta, 2021. "Addressing complex challenges in transformations and planning: A fuzzy spatial multicriteria analysis for identifying suitable locations for urban infrastructures," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:26:y:2024:i:10:d:10.1007_s10668-023-03720-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.