IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v23y2021i2d10.1007_s10668-020-00665-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Traditional ecological knowledge in a ferruginous ecosystem management: lessons for diversifying land use

Author

Listed:
  • Lina Marcela Urriago-Ospina

    (Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP))

  • Clarice Morais Jardim

    (UFOP)

  • Germán Rivera-Fernández

    (UFOP)

  • Alessandra Rodrigues Kozovits

    (UFOP)

  • Mariangela Garcia Praça Leite

    (UFOP)

  • Maria Cristina Teixeira Braga Messias

    (UFOP)

Abstract

Soils developed on banded iron formations (BIFs) present severe physical and chemical limitations to the establishment and growth of non-native cultivated plants. In Brazil, these areas are extensively exploited by Fe and Al mining, causing impacts that further hamper the growth of plant species for the purpose of ecological restoration or rehabilitation. However, traditional communities have historically managed this type of environment successfully for subsistence crops. An understanding of the methods used for such purpose will help future studies of land-use diversification and rehabilitation in these ferruginous soils. The aim of this study was to investigate the traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) of a community with great cultural richness inhabiting areas on BIFs in Ouro Preto, Brazil. Interviewees were selected by the snowball technique. Ethnoecological methods (interviews, free lists and guided visits) were used to record the types of soil management, cultivated species and socioeconomic profile of specialists. Specialists are mainly women over 45 years old, low schooling, born and living in the area for a long period. Trial and error and vertical transmission represent the main forms of TEK acquisition. There was high diversity of praxis in the ecological soil management, as well as of cultivated species (183). The methods used are efficient for the physical and chemical soil improvement, allowing the establishment of species, increasing agrobiodiversity and diversifying land use. The used techniques can provide technologies for the rehabilitation of mined areas, confirming the importance of ethnoecological studies for this purpose.

Suggested Citation

  • Lina Marcela Urriago-Ospina & Clarice Morais Jardim & Germán Rivera-Fernández & Alessandra Rodrigues Kozovits & Mariangela Garcia Praça Leite & Maria Cristina Teixeira Braga Messias, 2021. "Traditional ecological knowledge in a ferruginous ecosystem management: lessons for diversifying land use," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 2092-2121, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:23:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s10668-020-00665-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-020-00665-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-020-00665-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-020-00665-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tiffany L. Fess & Vagner A. Benedito, 2018. "Organic versus Conventional Cropping Sustainability: A Comparative System Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-42, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Atanu Mukherjee & Emmanuel C. Omondi & Paul R. Hepperly & Rita Seidel & Wade P. Heller, 2020. "Impacts of Organic and Conventional Management on the Nutritional Level of Vegetables," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-25, October.
    2. Nesar Ahmed & Shirley Thompson & Giovanni M. Turchini, 2020. "Organic aquaculture productivity, environmental sustainability, and food security: insights from organic agriculture," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 12(6), pages 1253-1267, December.
    3. Debuschewitz, Emil & Sanders, Jürn, 2021. "Bewertung der Umweltwirkungen des ökologischen Landbaus im Kontext der kontroversen wissenschaftlichen Diskurse," 61st Annual Conference, Berlin, Germany, September 22-24, 2021 317076, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    4. Tomasz Rokicki & Aleksandra Perkowska & Bogdan Klepacki & Piotr Bórawski & Aneta Bełdycka-Bórawska & Konrad Michalski, 2021. "Changes in Energy Consumption in Agriculture in the EU Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-21, March.
    5. Botir Khaitov & Munisa Urmonova & Aziz Karimov & Botirjon Sulaymonov & Kholik Allanov & Inomjon Israilov & Oybek Sottorov, 2021. "Licorice ( Glycyrrhiza glabra )—Growth and Phytochemical Compound Secretion in Degraded Lands under Drought Stress," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-11, March.
    6. Chantal Gascuel & Michèle Tixier-Boichard & Benoit Dedieu & Cécile Détang-Dessendre & Pierre Dupraz & Philippe Faverdin & Laurent Hazard & Philippe Hinsinger & Isabelle Litrico-Chiarelli & Françoise M, 2019. "Réflexion prospective interdisciplinaire pour l’agroécologie. Rapport de synthèse," Post-Print hal-02154433, HAL.
    7. Sapinas, I.P. & Abbott, L.K., 2020. "Soil Fertility Management Based on Certified Organic Agriculture Standards – a Review," Sustainable Agriculture Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(2).
    8. Leah L. Bremer & Kim Falinski & Casey Ching & Christopher A. Wada & Kimberly M. Burnett & Kanekoa Kukea-Shultz & Nicholas Reppun & Gregory Chun & Kirsten L.L. Oleson & Tamara Ticktin, 2018. "Biocultural Restoration of Traditional Agriculture: Cultural, Environmental, and Economic Outcomes of Lo‘i Kalo Restoration in He‘eia, O‘ahu," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-21, November.
    9. Adityawarman Adil & Rizal Syarief & Widiatmaka & Mukhamad Najib, 2022. "Stakeholder Analysis and Prioritization of Sustainable Organic Farming Management: A Case Study of Bogor, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-16, December.
    10. Jorge Freitas & Pedro Silva, 2022. "Sustainable Agricultural Systems for Fruit Orchards: The Influence of Plant Growth Promoting Bacteria on the Soil Biodiversity and Nutrient Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-18, October.
    11. Cristian Pérez-Caselles & Margarita Brugarolas & Laura Martínez-Carrasco, 2020. "Traditional Varieties for Local Markets: A Sustainable Proposal for Agricultural SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-19, June.
    12. Bonisoli, Lorenzo & Piedra-Muñoz, Laura & Galdeano-Gómez, Emilio & Pérez Mesa, Juan Carlos, 2019. "Benchmarking agri-food sustainability certifications: evidences from applying SAFA in the Ecuadorian banana agri-system," MPRA Paper 119956, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Sabrina Magaly Navas Cajamarca & Douglas Martins & Juscimar da Silva & Mariana Rodrigues Fontenelle & Ítalo Moraes Rocha Guedes & Cícero Célio de Figueiredo & Carlos Eduardo Pacheco Lima, 2019. "Heterogeneity in the Chemical Composition of Biofertilizers, Potential Agronomic Use, and Heavy Metal Contents of Different Agro-Industrial Wastes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-13, April.
    14. Sylwia Wesołowska & Barbara Futa & Magdalena Myszura & Agata Kobyłka, 2022. "Residual Effects of Different Cropping Systems on Physicochemical Properties and the Activity of Phosphatases of Soil," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-16, May.
    15. Galiana-Carballo, C. & Rivera-Ferre, M.G. & Méndez, P.F. & Palau-Salvador, G., 2024. "Reducing fossil fuel dependency in smallholding farming in l'Horta de València, Spain: A socio-metabolic approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    16. Guang Yang & Hua Yan & Quanfeng Li, 2023. "Coordination Analysis of Sustainable Agricultural Development in Northeast China from the Perspective of Spatiotemporal Relationships," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-25, November.
    17. Zoran Ciric P & Dragan Stojic & Otilija Sedlak & Aleksandra Marcikic Horvat & Zana Kleut, 2019. "Innovation Model of Agricultural Technologies Based on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-12, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:23:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s10668-020-00665-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.