IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i4p1674-d1593482.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social and Environmental Trade-Offs and Synergies in Cocoa Production: Does the Farming System Matter?

Author

Listed:
  • Joseph Bandanaa

    (Institute for Environment and Sanitation Studies, University of Ghana, Legon, Accra P.O. Box 209, Ghana
    CSIR Plant Genetic Resources Research Institute (PGRRI), Bunso P.O. Box 7, Eastern Region, Ghana)

  • Isaac K. Asante

    (Department of Plant Biology and Environment, University of Ghana, Legon, Accra P.O. Box 586, Ghana)

  • Ted Y. Annang

    (Institute for Environment and Sanitation Studies, University of Ghana, Legon, Accra P.O. Box 209, Ghana)

  • Johan Blockeel

    (Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL), 5070 Frick, Switzerland)

  • Anja Heidenreich

    (Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL), 5070 Frick, Switzerland)

  • Irene Kadzere

    (Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL), 5070 Frick, Switzerland)

  • Christian Schader

    (Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL), 5070 Frick, Switzerland)

  • Irene S. Egyir

    (Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, University of Ghana, Legon, Accra P.O. Box 68, Ghana)

Abstract

Although cocoa production addresses the livelihoods of several rural households, there is a global concern about its negative impact on the physical environment. How does this trade-off play out in different farming systems? This paper examined the social and environmental trade-offs and synergies of organic and conventional cocoa farming systems. Using the ‘SMART Farm-tool’ and principal component analysis approach, data collected from 398 cocoa farmers in five communities in the Atwima Mponua District of Ghana were analysed. We found that social and environmental trade-offs in the organic cocoa farming system are labour-related (EV = −0.38). The social and environmental trade-offs in the conventional cocoa farming system are health and safety and biodiversity-related (EV = −0.64). The organic farming system recognises indigenous knowledge in promoting biodiversity conservation and land degradation reduction (EV = −0.57). There can be more synergy than trade-off in both systems if support for capacity building and credit is provided and indigenous knowledge sharing is prioritised among low-income and vulnerable farmers. In this way, the labour conditions, biodiversity conservation, and health and safety-related concerns will be addressed. Addressing labour concerns in organic cocoa farming involves improving efficiency and working conditions. Strategies include training programs for organic techniques, introducing technology for tasks, and adhering to fair labour standards. This ensures labour concerns are addressed across the supply chain.

Suggested Citation

  • Joseph Bandanaa & Isaac K. Asante & Ted Y. Annang & Johan Blockeel & Anja Heidenreich & Irene Kadzere & Christian Schader & Irene S. Egyir, 2025. "Social and Environmental Trade-Offs and Synergies in Cocoa Production: Does the Farming System Matter?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-14, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:1674-:d:1593482
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/4/1674/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/4/1674/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Amer Ait Sidhoum & K Hervé Dakpo & Laure Latruffe, 2022. "Trade-offs between economic, environmental and social sustainability on farms using a latent class frontier efficiency model: Evidence for Spanish crop farms," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(1), pages 1-17, January.
    2. Tiffany L. Fess & Vagner A. Benedito, 2018. "Organic versus Conventional Cropping Sustainability: A Comparative System Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-42, January.
    3. Felix Akrofi-Atitianti & Chinwe Ifejika Speranza & Louis Bockel & Richard Asare, 2018. "Assessing Climate Smart Agriculture and Its Determinants of Practice in Ghana: A Case of the Cocoa Production System," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-21, March.
    4. Naveen P Singh & Bhawna Anand & Surendra Singh & S K Srivastava & Ch Srinivasa Rao & K V Rao & S K Bal, 2021. "Synergies and trade-offs for climate-resilient agriculture in India: an agro-climatic zone assessment," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 164(1), pages 1-26, January.
    5. Amanda Berlan, 2013. "Social Sustainability in Agriculture: An Anthropological Perspective on Child Labour in Cocoa Production in Ghana," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(8), pages 1088-1100, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Atanu Mukherjee & Emmanuel C. Omondi & Paul R. Hepperly & Rita Seidel & Wade P. Heller, 2020. "Impacts of Organic and Conventional Management on the Nutritional Level of Vegetables," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-25, October.
    2. Krauss, Alexander, 2017. "Understanding child labour beyond the standard economic assumption of monetary poverty," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 68497, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Yuting Sun & Shu-Nung Yao, 2022. "Sustainability Trade-Offs in Media Coverage of Poverty Alleviation: A Content-Based Spatiotemporal Analysis in China’s Provinces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-26, August.
    4. Nesar Ahmed & Shirley Thompson & Giovanni M. Turchini, 2020. "Organic aquaculture productivity, environmental sustainability, and food security: insights from organic agriculture," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 12(6), pages 1253-1267, December.
    5. Marta Guth & Katarzyna Smędzik-Ambroży & Bazyli Czyżewski & Sebastian Stępień, 2020. "The Economic Sustainability of Farms under Common Agricultural Policy in the European Union Countries," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-20, January.
    6. Pouria Ataei & Hassan Sadighi & Mohammad Chizari & Enayat Abbasi, 2020. "In-depth content analysis of conservation agriculture training programs in Iran based on sustainability dimensions," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(8), pages 7215-7237, December.
    7. Debuschewitz, Emil & Sanders, Jürn, 2021. "Bewertung der Umweltwirkungen des ökologischen Landbaus im Kontext der kontroversen wissenschaftlichen Diskurse," 61st Annual Conference, Berlin, Germany, September 22-24, 2021 317076, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    8. Sheona Shackleton & Vanessa Masterson & Paul Hebinck & Chinwe Ifejika Speranza & Dian Spear & Maria Tengö, 2019. "Editorial for Special Issue: “Livelihood and Landscape Change in Africa: Future Trajectories for Improved Well-Being under a Changing Climate”," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-8, July.
    9. Beibei Guo & Tingting Cheng & Tingting Sun & Yi Tong & Sifeng Nian, 2024. "Identifying the Complexity of the Food-Energy-Water Nexus Based on Emergy Analysis in Crop Production Systems of China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-25, October.
    10. Andika Wahab & Ramli Dollah, 2023. "Measuring Child Labor in Oil Palm Production in Sabah, Malaysia," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, October.
    11. Sarpong, D. B. & Mabhaudhi, Tafadzwanashe & Minh, Thai & Cofie, Olufunke, 2022. "Sustainable financing ecosystem for cocoa irrigation in Ghana: a literature review," IWMI Books, Reports H051654, International Water Management Institute.
    12. Hannibal, Claire & Kauppi, Katri, 2019. "Third party social sustainability assessment: Is it a multi-tier supply chain solution?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 78-87.
    13. Tomasz Rokicki & Aleksandra Perkowska & Bogdan Klepacki & Piotr Bórawski & Aneta Bełdycka-Bórawska & Konrad Michalski, 2021. "Changes in Energy Consumption in Agriculture in the EU Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-21, March.
    14. Marije Schaafsma & Ilda Dreoni & Lacour Mody Ayompe & Benis Egoh & Dewa Putu Ekayana & Arilson Favareto & Sonny Mumbunan & Louise Nakagawa & Jonas Ngouhouo‐poufoun & Marieke Sassen & Thiago Kanashiro , 2023. "A framework to understand the social impacts of agricultural trade," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(1), pages 138-150, February.
    15. Das, Usha & Ansari, M.A. & Ghosh, Souvik, 2022. "Effectiveness and upscaling potential of climate smart agriculture interventions: Farmers' participatory prioritization and livelihood indicators as its determinants," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    16. Roberto Louis Forestal & Shih-Ming Pi, 2021. "Using Artificial Neural networks and Optimal Scaling Model to Forecast Agriculture Commodity Price: An Ecological-economic Approach," Advances in Management and Applied Economics, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 11(3), pages 1-3.
    17. Victor O. Abegunde & Melusi Sibanda & Ajuruchukwu Obi, 2020. "Mainstreaming Climate-Smart Agriculture in Small-Scale Farming Systems: A Holistic Nonparametric Applicability Assessment in South Africa," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, February.
    18. Botir Khaitov & Munisa Urmonova & Aziz Karimov & Botirjon Sulaymonov & Kholik Allanov & Inomjon Israilov & Oybek Sottorov, 2021. "Licorice ( Glycyrrhiza glabra )—Growth and Phytochemical Compound Secretion in Degraded Lands under Drought Stress," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-11, March.
    19. Chantal Gascuel & Michèle Tixier-Boichard & Benoit Dedieu & Cécile Détang-Dessendre & Pierre Dupraz & Philippe Faverdin & Laurent Hazard & Philippe Hinsinger & Isabelle Litrico-Chiarelli & Françoise M, 2019. "Réflexion prospective interdisciplinaire pour l’agroécologie. Rapport de synthèse," Post-Print hal-02154433, HAL.
    20. Fadi Sayegh, 2023. "Engineers' climate change awareness and sustainable asset management practices," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 3(5), pages 1-25, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:1674-:d:1593482. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.