IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/elmark/v31y2021i2d10.1007_s12525-020-00441-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trustworthy artificial intelligence

Author

Listed:
  • Scott Thiebes

    (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology)

  • Sebastian Lins

    (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology)

  • Ali Sunyaev

    (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology)

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) brings forth many opportunities to contribute to the wellbeing of individuals and the advancement of economies and societies, but also a variety of novel ethical, legal, social, and technological challenges. Trustworthy AI (TAI) bases on the idea that trust builds the foundation of societies, economies, and sustainable development, and that individuals, organizations, and societies will therefore only ever be able to realize the full potential of AI, if trust can be established in its development, deployment, and use. With this article we aim to introduce the concept of TAI and its five foundational principles (1) beneficence, (2) non-maleficence, (3) autonomy, (4) justice, and (5) explicability. We further draw on these five principles to develop a data-driven research framework for TAI and demonstrate its utility by delineating fruitful avenues for future research, particularly with regard to the distributed ledger technology-based realization of TAI.

Suggested Citation

  • Scott Thiebes & Sebastian Lins & Ali Sunyaev, 2021. "Trustworthy artificial intelligence," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(2), pages 447-464, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:elmark:v:31:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s12525-020-00441-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s12525-020-00441-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12525-020-00441-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12525-020-00441-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rachel Courtland, 2018. "Bias detectives: the researchers striving to make algorithms fair," Nature, Nature, vol. 558(7710), pages 357-360, June.
    2. Anthony Vance & Christophe M. Elie-Dit-Cosaque & Detmar W. Straub, 2008. "Examining Trust in Information Technology Artifacts: The Effects of System Quality and Culture," Post-Print halshs-00641137, HAL.
    3. Arun Rai, 2020. "Explainable AI: from black box to glass box," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(1), pages 137-141, January.
    4. Moon Soo Kim & Jee Yong Chung, 2018. "Sustainable Growth and Token Economy Design: The Case of Steemit," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, December.
    5. Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa & Thomas R. Shaw & D. Sandy Staples, 2004. "Toward Contextualized Theories of Trust: The Role of Trust in Global Virtual Teams," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 15(3), pages 250-267, September.
    6. Adam, Martin & Wessel, Michael & Benlian, Alexander, 2020. "AI-based chatbots in customer service and their effects on user compliance," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 119304, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    7. Venkata Marella & Bikesh Upreti & Jani Merikivi & Virpi Kristiina Tuunainen, 2020. "Understanding the creation of trust in cryptocurrencies: the case of Bitcoin," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 30(2), pages 259-271, June.
    8. Dorian Selz, 2020. "From electronic markets to data driven insights," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 30(1), pages 57-59, March.
    9. repec:dau:papers:123456789/2723 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. D. Harrison McKnight & Vivek Choudhury & Charles Kacmar, 2002. "Developing and Validating Trust Measures for e-Commerce: An Integrative Typology," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 334-359, September.
    11. Thibault de Swarte & Boufous Omar & Paul Escalle, 2019. "Artificial intelligence, ethics and human values : the cases of military drones and companion robots," Post-Print hal-02277624, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wallbach, Sören, 2020. "Assimilation and Diffusion of Multi-Sided Platforms in Dynamic B2B Networks: Inhibiting Factors and Their Consequences," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 123277, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    2. Ming Yang & Jinglu Jiang & Melody Kiang & Fangyun Yuan, 2022. "Re-Examining the Impact of Multidimensional Trust on Patients’ Online Medical Consultation Service Continuance Decision," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 983-1007, June.
    3. Wallbach, Sören & Lehner, Roland & Röthke, Konstantin & Elbert, Ralf & Benlian, Alexander, 2020. "Trust-Building Effects of Blockchain Features – An Empirical Analysis of Immutability, Traceability and Anonymity," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 120705, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    4. Sara Moussawi & Marios Koufaris & Raquel Benbunan-Fich, 2021. "How perceptions of intelligence and anthropomorphism affect adoption of personal intelligent agents," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(2), pages 343-364, June.
    5. Jung Lee & Jae-Nam Lee & Bernard C. Y. Tan, 2015. "Antecedents of cognitive trust and affective distrust and their mediating roles in building customer loyalty," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 159-175, February.
    6. Nancy K. Lankton & D. Harrison McKnight & Ryan T. Wright & Jason Bennett Thatcher, 2016. "Research Note—Using Expectation Disconfirmation Theory and Polynomial Modeling to Understand Trust in Technology," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(1), pages 197-213, March.
    7. Chrisanthi Avgerou & Andrea Ganzaroli & Angeliki Poulymenakou & Nicolau Reinhard, 2009. "Interpreting the trustworthiness of government mediated by information and communication technology: lessons from electronic voting in Brazil," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 30285, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Weiquan Wang & May Wang, 2019. "Effects of Sponsorship Disclosure on Perceived Integrity of Biased Recommendation Agents: Psychological Contract Violation and Knowledge-Based Trust Perspectives," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(2), pages 507-522, June.
    9. Weck, Marina & Afanassieva, Marianne, 2023. "Toward the adoption of digital assistive technology: Factors affecting older people's initial trust formation," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(2).
    10. Chai, Sangmi & Kim, Minkyun, 2010. "What makes bloggers share knowledge? An investigation on the role of trust," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 408-415.
    11. Bo-Chiuan Su & Li-Wei Wu & Ying-Chi Yen, 2021. "Antecedents and Consequences of Trust and Loyalty in Physical Banks Affecting Mobile Payments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-27, November.
    12. Fernanda Leão Ramos & Jorge Brantes Ferreira & Angilberto Sabino de Freitas & Juliana Werneck Rodrigues, 2018. "The Effect of Trust in the Intention to Use m-banking," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 15(2), pages 175-191, March.
    13. Greenberg, Penelope Sue & Greenberg, Ralph H. & Antonucci, Yvonne Lederer, 2007. "Creating and sustaining trust in virtual teams," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 50(4), pages 325-333.
    14. Bettina Distel & Holger Koelmann & Ralf Plattfaut & Jörg Becker, 2022. "Watch who you trust! A structured literature review to build a typology of e-government risks," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 789-818, December.
    15. Tussyadiah, Iis P. & Zach, Florian J. & Wang, Jianxi, 2020. "Do travelers trust intelligent service robots?," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    16. Yin Ma & Athapol Ruangkanjanases & Shih-Chih Chen, 2019. "Investigating the Impact of Critical Factors on Continuance Intention towards Cross-Border Shopping Websites," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-17, October.
    17. Toufaily, Elissar & Zalan, Tatiana, 2024. "In blockchain we trust? Demystifying the “trust” mechanism in blockchain ecosystems," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    18. Xin Lin & Shu-Chen Chang & Tung-Hsiang Chou & Shih-Chih Chen & Athapol Ruangkanjanases, 2021. "Consumers’ Intention to Adopt Blockchain Food Traceability Technology towards Organic Food Products," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-19, January.
    19. Viju Raghupathi & Raquel Benbunan-Fich, 2020. "A Social Capital Perspective on Computer-Mediated Group Communication and Performance: An Empirical Study," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 29(4), pages 747-801, August.
    20. Tao Zhou, 2015. "Understanding user adoption of location-based services from a dual perspective of enablers and inhibitors," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 413-422, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Trustworthy artificial intelligence; Artificial intelligence; Trust; Framework; Distributed ledger technology; Blockchain;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M15 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - IT Management
    • O30 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - General
    • A13 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Relation of Economics to Social Values
    • C80 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:elmark:v:31:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s12525-020-00441-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.