IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/elcore/v16y2016i3d10.1007_s10660-015-9204-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mobile commerce and device specific perceived risk

Author

Listed:
  • Brian P. Cozzarin

    (University of Waterloo)

  • Stanko Dimitrov

    (University of Waterloo)

Abstract

This study examines the role of perceived risk and access device type on consumers’ on-line purchase decisions. We use a two-step hurdle approach to estimate consumer behavior. In the first step, the decision of whether to engage in eCommerce is estimated and in the second step, how many orders to place is estimated. We use a large multi-year survey sample of households from Canada’s national statistical agency—Statistics Canada. The sample size is such that we are able to conduct sub-sample analysis of PC-only users, mobile-only users, and other-users. We show that online security and price significantly influence mobile eCommerce. We also show that there is a statistically significant difference in the intensity of eCommerce engagement across device type and consumer risk type (high/low). One of our main findings is that perceived risk affects purchase decisions for mobile users more than PC users, however additional comparisons are carried out with our analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Brian P. Cozzarin & Stanko Dimitrov, 2016. "Mobile commerce and device specific perceived risk," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 335-354, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:elcore:v:16:y:2016:i:3:d:10.1007_s10660-015-9204-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s10660-015-9204-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10660-015-9204-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10660-015-9204-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Forsythe, Sandra M. & Shi, Bo, 2003. "Consumer patronage and risk perceptions in Internet shopping," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 56(11), pages 867-875, November.
    2. Ani L. Katchova & Mario J. Miranda, 2004. "Two-Step Econometric Estimation of Farm Characteristics Affecting Marketing Contract Decisions," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 86(1), pages 88-102.
    3. Kim Huat Goh & Jesse C. Bockstedt, 2013. "The Framing Effects of Multipart Pricing on Consumer Purchasing Behavior of Customized Information Good Bundles," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(2), pages 334-351, June.
    4. Mullahy, John, 1986. "Specification and testing of some modified count data models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 341-365, December.
    5. Garbarino, Ellen & Strahilevitz, Michal, 2004. "Gender differences in the perceived risk of buying online and the effects of receiving a site recommendation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(7), pages 768-775, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Martin P. Fritze & Andreas B. Eisingerich & Martin Benkenstein, 2019. "Digital transformation and possession attachment: examining the endowment effect for consumers’ relationships with hedonic and utilitarian digital service technologies," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 311-337, June.
    2. Shaw, Norman & Sergueeva, Ksenia, 2019. "The non-monetary benefits of mobile commerce: Extending UTAUT2 with perceived value," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 44-55.
    3. Benjamin Barann & Jan H. Betzing & Marco Niemann & Benedikt Hoffmeister & Jörg Becker, 2022. "Exploring customers’ likeliness to use e-service touchpoints in brick and mortar retail," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(2), pages 523-545, June.
    4. Xiaoyu Li & Jiahong Yuan & Yan Shi & Tianteng Wang & Xiangpei Hu & Felix Tung Sun Chan & Junhu Ruan, 2020. "An extended Bass Model on consumer quantity of B2C commerce platforms," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 609-628, September.
    5. Talwar, Shalini & Dhir, Amandeep & Khalil, Ashraf & Mohan, Geetha & Islam, A.K.M. Najmul, 2020. "Point of adoption and beyond. Initial trust and mobile-payment continuation intention," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    6. Chi, Ting, 2018. "Understanding Chinese consumer adoption of apparel mobile commerce: An extended TAM approach," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 274-284.
    7. Pham, Thi Song Hanh & Ahammad, Mohammad Faisal, 2017. "Antecedents and consequences of online customer satisfaction: A holistic process perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 332-342.
    8. Sohn, Stefanie & Groß, Michael, 2020. "Understanding the inhibitors to consumer mobile purchasing intentions," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    9. Younghoon Chang & Siew Fan Wong & Christian Fernando Libaque-Saenz & Hwansoo Lee, 2019. "e-Commerce Sustainability: The Case of Pinduoduo in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-23, July.
    10. Sabina Lissitsa & Ofrit Kol, 2021. "Four generational cohorts and hedonic m-shopping: association between personality traits and purchase intention," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 545-570, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Faqih, Khaled M.S., 2016. "An empirical analysis of factors predicting the behavioral intention to adopt Internet shopping technology among non-shoppers in a developing country context: Does gender matter?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 140-164.
    2. Alrawad, Mahmaod & Lutfi, Abdalwali & Alyatama, Sundus & Al Khattab, Adel & Alsoboa, Sliman S. & Almaiah, Mohammed Amin & Ramadan, Mujtaba Hashim & Arafa, Hussin Mostafa & Ahmed, Nazar Ali & Alsyouf, , 2023. "Assessing customers perception of online shopping risks: A structural equation modeling–based multigroup analysis," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    3. Xiaolin Lin & Mauricio Featherman & Stoney L. Brooks & Nick Hajli, 2019. "Exploring Gender Differences in Online Consumer Purchase Decision Making: An Online Product Presentation Perspective," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(5), pages 1187-1201, October.
    4. Shu-Yi Liaw & Thi Mai Le, 2017. "Under Interruptive Effects of Rarity and Mental Accounting, Whether the Online Purchase Intention Can Still Be Enhanced Even with Higher Search Costs and Perceived Risk," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(8), pages 160-160, July.
    5. Molina-Castillo, Francisco-Jose & Lopez-Nicolas, Carolina & Soto-Acosta, Pedro, 2012. "Interaction effects of media and message on perceived complexity, risk and trust of innovative products," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 577-587.
    6. Michaelidou, Nina & Micevski, Milena, 2019. "Consumers' ethical perceptions of social media analytics practices: Risks, benefits and potential outcomes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 576-586.
    7. Christophe Bezes, 2011. "Types de risques perçus et réducteurs de risques dans le commerce électronique : le cas du site Fnac.com," Post-Print hal-02086726, HAL.
    8. Patricea Elena BERTEA, 2015. "From Fearful To Trustful – How Perceived Risk Dimensions In E-Commerce Differentiate Between Consumers," Review of Economic and Business Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 15, pages 45-54, June.
    9. Yu-Shan Chen & Stanley Y.B. Huang, 2017. "The effect of task-technology fit on purchase intention: The moderating role of perceived risks," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(11), pages 1418-1438, November.
    10. Laukkanen, Tommi, 2016. "Consumer adoption versus rejection decisions in seemingly similar service innovations: The case of the Internet and mobile banking," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(7), pages 2432-2439.
    11. Wirawan Dony Dahana & HeeJae Shin & Sotaro Katsumata, 2018. "Influence of individual characteristics on whether and how much consumers engage in showrooming behavior," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 665-692, December.
    12. Xu, Xun & Jackson, Jonathan E., 2019. "Investigating the influential factors of return channel loyalty in omni-channel retailing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 118-132.
    13. Doris Morales-Solana & Irene Esteban-Millat & Alejandro Alegret Cotas, 2022. "Experiences in consumer flow in online supermarkets," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 1195-1226, December.
    14. Harrington, Donna Ramirez, 2012. "Two-stage adoption of different types of pollution prevention (P2) activities," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 349-373.
    15. Zafer Akýn & Ý. Erdem Seçilmiþ, 2015. "Risk Behavior, Risk Perception and Online Shopping: An Experimental Approach," IPEK Working Papers 1507, Ipek University, Department of Economics, revised Sep 2015.
    16. Hou, Jianwei & Elliott, Kevin, 2014. "How do online bidders differ from non-bidders?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 18-25.
    17. Juha Munnukka & Outi Uusitalo & Veera-Juulia Koivisto, 2017. "The consequences of perceived risk and objective knowledge for consumers’ investment behavior," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(4), pages 150-160, December.
    18. Lee, Yoojung & Kim, Hye-Young, 2019. "Consumer need for mobile app atmospherics and its relationships to shopper responses," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 437-442.
    19. Ganesh, Jaishankar & Reynolds, Kristy E. & Luckett, Michael & Pomirleanu, Nadia, 2010. "Online Shopper Motivations, and e-Store Attributes: An Examination of Online Patronage Behavior and Shopper Typologies," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 86(1), pages 106-115.
    20. Boncinelli, Fabio & Bartolini, Fabio & Casini, Leonardo, 2018. "Structural factors of labour allocation for farm diversification activities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 204-212.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:elcore:v:16:y:2016:i:3:d:10.1007_s10660-015-9204-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.