IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/coopap/v85y2023i3d10.1007_s10589-023-00470-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Distributionally robust Weber problem with uncertain demand

Author

Listed:
  • Yan Gu

    (Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics)

  • Jianlin Jiang

    (Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics)

  • Shun Zhang

    (Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics)

Abstract

Weber problem is an important model in facility location field, and it can be modeled as a stochastic problem when the future demand of customers is uncertain. By minimizing the maximal expectation of the objective on an ambiguity set, the distributionally robust optimization (DRO) can utilize the valuable information from historical data and thus it has become an attractive formulation for stochastic problems. In this paper, an extended moment-based DRO formulation and a polynomial-time algorithm are contributed to solving the Weber problem with uncertain demand. Specifically, by constructing a new ambiguity set, which is proved to contain the true distribution with high probability, an extended DRO formulation allowing positive semidefinite covariance matrix is first built for general stochastic problems. To obtain a more robust solution, the Weber problem is then reformulated into an equivalent stochastic variational inequality (SVI). Following the extended DRO formulation, a distributionally robust Weber problem (DRWP) is further developed with minimizing the expectation of a residual function of the SVI. The DRWP can be transformed to a semidefinite program (SDP) with an undesired exponential number of constraints. Through the adoption of a plane decomposition technique, a simple algorithm is proposed to solve the resulted SDP and obtain the optimal solution to DRWP in polynomial time. Some preliminary numerical results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed DRWP and algorithm.

Suggested Citation

  • Yan Gu & Jianlin Jiang & Shun Zhang, 2023. "Distributionally robust Weber problem with uncertain demand," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 85(3), pages 705-752, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:coopap:v:85:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s10589-023-00470-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s10589-023-00470-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10589-023-00470-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10589-023-00470-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ioana Popescu, 2005. "A Semidefinite Programming Approach to Optimal-Moment Bounds for Convex Classes of Distributions," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(3), pages 632-657, August.
    2. Jianlin Jiang & Xiaoming Yuan, 2012. "A Barzilai-Borwein-based heuristic algorithm for locating multiple facilities with regional demand," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 1275-1295, April.
    3. Dimitris Bertsimas & Melvyn Sim, 2004. "The Price of Robustness," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(1), pages 35-53, February.
    4. Laurent El Ghaoui & Maksim Oks & Francois Oustry, 2003. "Worst-Case Value-At-Risk and Robust Portfolio Optimization: A Conic Programming Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 51(4), pages 543-556, August.
    5. Dimitris Bertsimas & Nathan Kallus, 2020. "From Predictive to Prescriptive Analytics," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(3), pages 1025-1044, March.
    6. William Miehle, 1958. "Link-Length Minimization in Networks," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 6(2), pages 232-243, April.
    7. James E. Ward & Richard E. Wendell, 1985. "Using Block Norms for Location Modeling," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(5), pages 1074-1090, October.
    8. Jiang, Jian-Lin & Yuan, Xiao-Ming, 2008. "A heuristic algorithm for constrained multi-source Weber problem - The variational inequality approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 187(2), pages 357-370, June.
    9. Lotfi, Somayyeh & Zenios, Stavros A., 2018. "Robust VaR and CVaR optimization under joint ambiguity in distributions, means, and covariances," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(2), pages 556-576.
    10. Jianlin Jiang & Su Zhang & Yibing Lv & Xin Du & Ziwei Yan, 2020. "An ADMM-based location–allocation algorithm for nonconvex constrained multi-source Weber problem under gauge," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 76(4), pages 793-818, April.
    11. Erick Delage & Yinyu Ye, 2010. "Distributionally Robust Optimization Under Moment Uncertainty with Application to Data-Driven Problems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(3), pages 595-612, June.
    12. Bingsheng He & Li-Zhi Liao & Xiang Wang, 2012. "Proximal-like contraction methods for monotone variational inequalities in a unified framework I: Effective quadruplet and primary methods," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 649-679, March.
    13. Jinfeng Yue & Bintong Chen & Min-Chiang Wang, 2006. "Expected Value of Distribution Information for the Newsvendor Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 54(6), pages 1128-1136, December.
    14. Alumur, Sibel A. & Nickel, Stefan & Saldanha-da-Gama, Francisco, 2012. "Hub location under uncertainty," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(4), pages 529-543.
    15. B. K. Pagnoncelli & S. Ahmed & A. Shapiro, 2009. "Sample Average Approximation Method for Chance Constrained Programming: Theory and Applications," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 142(2), pages 399-416, August.
    16. Bingsheng He & Li-Zhi Liao & Xiang Wang, 2012. "Proximal-like contraction methods for monotone variational inequalities in a unified framework II: general methods and numerical experiments," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 681-708, March.
    17. M. J. Luo & G. H. Lin, 2009. "Expected Residual Minimization Method for Stochastic Variational Inequality Problems," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 140(1), pages 103-116, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhi Chen & Weijun Xie, 2021. "Regret in the Newsvendor Model with Demand and Yield Randomness," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(11), pages 4176-4197, November.
    2. L. Jeff Hong & Zhiyuan Huang & Henry Lam, 2021. "Learning-Based Robust Optimization: Procedures and Statistical Guarantees," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(6), pages 3447-3467, June.
    3. Steffen Rebennack, 2022. "Data-driven stochastic optimization for distributional ambiguity with integrated confidence region," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 84(2), pages 255-293, October.
    4. van Eekelen, Wouter, 2023. "Distributionally robust views on queues and related stochastic models," Other publications TiSEM 9b99fc05-9d68-48eb-ae8c-9, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    5. Georgia Perakis & Melvyn Sim & Qinshen Tang & Peng Xiong, 2023. "Robust Pricing and Production with Information Partitioning and Adaptation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(3), pages 1398-1419, March.
    6. Alireza Ghahtarani & Ahmed Saif & Alireza Ghasemi, 2022. "Robust portfolio selection problems: a comprehensive review," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 3203-3264, September.
    7. Panos Xidonas & Ralph Steuer & Christis Hassapis, 2020. "Robust portfolio optimization: a categorized bibliographic review," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 292(1), pages 533-552, September.
    8. Alireza Ghahtarani & Ahmed Saif & Alireza Ghasemi, 2021. "Robust Portfolio Selection Problems: A Comprehensive Review," Papers 2103.13806, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2022.
    9. Kobayashi, Ken & Takano, Yuichi & Nakata, Kazuhide, 2023. "Cardinality-constrained distributionally robust portfolio optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(3), pages 1173-1182.
    10. Zhi Chen & Melvyn Sim & Huan Xu, 2019. "Distributionally Robust Optimization with Infinitely Constrained Ambiguity Sets," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(5), pages 1328-1344, September.
    11. Viet Anh Nguyen & Fan Zhang & Shanshan Wang & Jose Blanchet & Erick Delage & Yinyu Ye, 2021. "Robustifying Conditional Portfolio Decisions via Optimal Transport," Papers 2103.16451, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2024.
    12. Shunichi Ohmori, 2021. "A Predictive Prescription Using Minimum Volume k -Nearest Neighbor Enclosing Ellipsoid and Robust Optimization," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-16, January.
    13. Pengyu Qian & Zizhuo Wang & Zaiwen Wen, 2015. "A Composite Risk Measure Framework for Decision Making under Uncertainty," Papers 1501.01126, arXiv.org.
    14. Aharon Ben-Tal & Dimitris Bertsimas & David B. Brown, 2010. "A Soft Robust Model for Optimization Under Ambiguity," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(4-part-2), pages 1220-1234, August.
    15. Shubhechyya Ghosal & Wolfram Wiesemann, 2020. "The Distributionally Robust Chance-Constrained Vehicle Routing Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 68(3), pages 716-732, May.
    16. Xie, Chen & Wang, Liangquan & Yang, Chaolin, 2021. "Robust inventory management with multiple supply sources," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(2), pages 463-474.
    17. Zhi Chen & Melvyn Sim & Peng Xiong, 2020. "Robust Stochastic Optimization Made Easy with RSOME," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(8), pages 3329-3339, August.
    18. Meysam Cheramin & Jianqiang Cheng & Ruiwei Jiang & Kai Pan, 2022. "Computationally Efficient Approximations for Distributionally Robust Optimization Under Moment and Wasserstein Ambiguity," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(3), pages 1768-1794, May.
    19. Wolfram Wiesemann & Daniel Kuhn & Melvyn Sim, 2014. "Distributionally Robust Convex Optimization," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(6), pages 1358-1376, December.
    20. Ebenezer Fiifi Emire Atta Mills & Bo Yu & Kailin Zeng, 2019. "Satisfying Bank Capital Requirements: A Robustness Approach in a Modified Roy Safety-First Framework," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-20, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:coopap:v:85:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s10589-023-00470-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.