IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/compst/v35y2020i4d10.1007_s00180-020-00993-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modified empirical likelihood-based confidence intervals for data containing many zero observations

Author

Listed:
  • Patrick Stewart

    (Bowling Green State University)

  • Wei Ning

    (Bowling Green State University
    Beijing Institute of Technology)

Abstract

Data containing many zeroes is popular in statistical applications, such as survey data. A confidence interval based on the traditional normal approximation may lead to poor coverage probabilities, especially when the nonzero values are highly skewed and the sample size is small or moderately large. The empirical likelihood (EL), a powerful nonparametric method, was proposed to construct confidence intervals under such a scenario. However, the traditional empirical likelihood experiences the issue of under-coverage problem which causes the coverage probability of the EL-based confidence intervals to be lower than the nominal level, especially in small sample sizes. In this paper, we investigate the numerical performance of three modified versions of the EL: the adjusted empirical likelihood, the transformed empirical likelihood, and the transformed adjusted empirical likelihood for data with various sample sizes and various proportions of zero values. Asymptotic distributions of the likelihood-type statistics have been established as the standard chi-square distribution. Simulations are conducted to compare coverage probabilities with other existing methods under different distributions. Real data has been given to illustrate the procedure of constructing confidence intervals.

Suggested Citation

  • Patrick Stewart & Wei Ning, 2020. "Modified empirical likelihood-based confidence intervals for data containing many zero observations," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 35(4), pages 2019-2042, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:compst:v:35:y:2020:i:4:d:10.1007_s00180-020-00993-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s00180-020-00993-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00180-020-00993-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00180-020-00993-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alan Welsh & Xiao-Hua Zhou, 2004. "Estimating the Retransformed Mean in a Heteroscedastic Two-Part Model," UW Biostatistics Working Paper Series 1047, Berkeley Electronic Press.
    2. Puying Zhao & Malay Ghosh & J. N. K. Rao & Changbao Wu, 2020. "Bayesian empirical likelihood inference with complex survey data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 82(1), pages 155-174, February.
    3. Kvanli, Alan H & Shen, Yaung Kaung & Deng, Lih Yuan, 1998. "Construction of Confidence Intervals for the Mean of a Population Containing Many Zero Values," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 16(3), pages 362-368, July.
    4. Xiao-Hua Zhou & Wanzhu Tu, 2000. "Confidence Intervals for the Mean of Diagnostic Test Charge Data Containing Zeros," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 56(4), pages 1118-1125, December.
    5. Sang, Peijun & Wang, Liangliang & Cao, Jiguo, 2019. "Weighted empirical likelihood inference for dynamical correlations," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 194-206.
    6. Liang, Wei & Dai, Hongsheng & He, Shuyuan, 2019. "Mean Empirical Likelihood," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 155-169.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Suthakaran Ratnasingam & Spencer Wallace & Imran Amani & Jade Romero, 2024. "Nonparametric confidence intervals for generalized Lorenz curve using modified empirical likelihood," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 39(6), pages 3073-3090, September.
    2. Geng, Shuli & Zhang, Lixin, 2024. "Decorrelated empirical likelihood for generalized linear models with high-dimensional longitudinal data," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Song Xi & Qin, Jing, 2003. "Empirical likelihood-based confidence intervals for data with possible zero observations," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 65(1), pages 29-37, October.
    2. Aldo M. Garay & Victor H. Lachos & Heleno Bolfarine, 2015. "Bayesian estimation and case influence diagnostics for the zero-inflated negative binomial regression model," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(6), pages 1148-1165, June.
    3. Janusz L. Wywiał, 2018. "Application of Two Gamma Distributions Mixture to Financial Auditing," Sankhya B: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 80(1), pages 1-18, May.
    4. Rong Tang & Yun Yang, 2022. "Bayesian inference for risk minimization via exponentially tilted empirical likelihood," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 84(4), pages 1257-1286, September.
    5. Liang, Wei & Dai, Hongsheng, 2021. "Empirical likelihood based on synthetic right censored data," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    6. Jadhav, Sneha & Ma, Shuangge, 2021. "An association test for functional data based on Kendall’s Tau," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    7. Harold D Chiang & Yukitoshi Matsushita & Taisuke Otsu, 2021. "Multiway empirical likelihood," Papers 2108.04852, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2024.
    8. Douglas J. Taylor & Lawrence L. Kupper & Stephen M. Rappaport & Robert H. Lyles, 2001. "A Mixture Model for Occupational Exposure Mean Testing with a Limit of Detection," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 57(3), pages 681-688, September.
    9. Maria Goranova & Rahi Abouk & Paul C. Nystrom & Ehsan S. Soofi, 2017. "Corporate governance antecedents to shareholder activism: A zero-inflated process," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(2), pages 415-435, February.
    10. Hsin‐wen Chang & Ian W. McKeague, 2022. "Empirical likelihood‐based inference for functional means with application to wearable device data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 84(5), pages 1947-1968, November.
    11. Harold D Chiang & Yukitoshi Matsushita & Taisuke Otsu, 2021. "Multiway empirical likelihood," STICERD - Econometrics Paper Series 617, Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines, LSE.
    12. Garay, Aldo M. & Hashimoto, Elizabeth M. & Ortega, Edwin M.M. & Lachos, Víctor H., 2011. "On estimation and influence diagnostics for zero-inflated negative binomial regression models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(3), pages 1304-1318, March.
    13. Zou, Guang Yong & Taleban, Julia & Huo, Cindy Y., 2009. "Confidence interval estimation for lognormal data with application to health economics," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(11), pages 3755-3764, September.
    14. Yves G. Berger, 2023. "Unconditional empirical likelihood approach for analytic use of public survey data," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 50(1), pages 383-410, March.
    15. Li, Xinmin & Zhou, Xiaohua & Tian, Lili, 2013. "Interval estimation for the mean of lognormal data with excess zeros," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 83(11), pages 2447-2453.
    16. Yves G. Berger & Paola M. Chiodini & Mariangela Zenga, 2021. "Bounds for monetary-unit sampling in auditing: an adjusted empirical likelihood approach," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 62(6), pages 2739-2761, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:compst:v:35:y:2020:i:4:d:10.1007_s00180-020-00993-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.