IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/compst/v18y2003i2d10.1007_s001800300142.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Smoothing and mixed models

Author

Listed:
  • M. P. Wand

    (Harvard University)

Abstract

Summary Smoothing methods that use. basis functions with penalisation can be formulated as maximum likelihood estimators and best predictors in a mixed model framework. Such connections are at least a quarter of a century old but, perhaps with the advent of mixed model software, have led to a paradigm shift in the field of smoothing. The reason is that most, perhaps all, models involving smoothing can be expressed as a mixed model and hence enjoy the benefit of the growing body of methodology and software for general mixed model analysis. The handling of other complications such as clustering, missing data and measurement error is generally quite straightforward with mixed model representations of smoothing.

Suggested Citation

  • M. P. Wand, 2003. "Smoothing and mixed models," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 223-249, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:compst:v:18:y:2003:i:2:d:10.1007_s001800300142
    DOI: 10.1007/s001800300142
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s001800300142
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s001800300142?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yuedong Wang, 1998. "Mixed effects smoothing spline analysis of variance," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 60(1), pages 159-174.
    2. Antoniadis A. & Fan J., 2001. "Regularization of Wavelet Approximations," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 96, pages 939-967, September.
    3. Wing‐Kam Fung & Zhong‐Yi Zhu & Bo‐Cheng Wei & Xuming He, 2002. "Influence diagnostics and outlier tests for semiparametric mixed models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 64(3), pages 565-579, August.
    4. Arũnas P. Verbyla & Brian R. Cullis & Michael G. Kenward & Sue J. Welham, 1999. "The Analysis of Designed Experiments and Longitudinal Data by Using Smoothing Splines," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 48(3), pages 269-311.
    5. X. Lin & D. Zhang, 1999. "Inference in generalized additive mixed modelsby using smoothing splines," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 61(2), pages 381-400, April.
    6. Brent A. Coull & David Ruppert & M. P. Wand, 2001. "Simple Incorporation of Interactions into Additive Models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 57(2), pages 539-545, June.
    7. Ke C. & Wang Y., 2001. "Semiparametric Nonlinear Mixed-Effects Models and Their Applications," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 96, pages 1272-1298, December.
    8. Gareth M. James & Trevor J. Hastie, 2001. "Functional linear discriminant analysis for irregularly sampled curves," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 63(3), pages 533-550.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Øystein Sørensen & Anders M. Fjell & Kristine B. Walhovd, 2023. "Longitudinal Modeling of Age-Dependent Latent Traits with Generalized Additive Latent and Mixed Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 88(2), pages 456-486, June.
    2. Faustin Habyarimana & Shaun Ramroop, 2015. "Determinants of Poverty of Households: Semi parametric Analysis of Demographic and Health Survey Data from Rwanda," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 7(3), pages 47-55.
    3. Lihui Zhao & Tom Chen & Vladimir Novitsky & Rui Wang, 2021. "Joint penalized spline modeling of multivariate longitudinal data, with application to HIV‐1 RNA load levels and CD4 cell counts," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 77(3), pages 1061-1074, September.
    4. Welham, S.J. & Thompson, R., 2009. "A note on bimodality in the log-likelihood function for penalized spline mixed models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(4), pages 920-931, February.
    5. Xiao Ni & Daowen Zhang & Hao Helen Zhang, 2010. "Variable Selection for Semiparametric Mixed Models in Longitudinal Studies," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 66(1), pages 79-88, March.
    6. Laurini, Fabrizio & Pauli, Francesco, 2009. "Smoothing sample extremes: The mixed model approach," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(11), pages 3842-3854, September.
    7. Göran Kauermann & Tatyana Krivobokova & Ludwig Fahrmeir, 2009. "Some asymptotic results on generalized penalized spline smoothing," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 71(2), pages 487-503, April.
    8. Lee, Dae-Jin & Durbán, María, 2008. "Smooth-car mixed models for spatial count data," DES - Working Papers. Statistics and Econometrics. WS ws085820, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Estadística.
    9. Hua Liang, 2009. "Generalized partially linear mixed-effects models incorporating mismeasured covariates," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 61(1), pages 27-46, March.
    10. Derick R. Peterson & Hongwei Zhao & Sara Eapen, 2003. "Using Local Correlation in Kernel-Based Smoothers for Dependent Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 59(4), pages 984-991, December.
    11. Veerabhadran Baladandayuthapani & Bani K. Mallick & Mee Young Hong & Joanne R. Lupton & Nancy D. Turner & Raymond J. Carroll, 2008. "Bayesian Hierarchical Spatially Correlated Functional Data Analysis with Application to Colon Carcinogenesis," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(1), pages 64-73, March.
    12. Simon N. Wood, 2006. "Low-Rank Scale-Invariant Tensor Product Smooths for Generalized Additive Mixed Models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 62(4), pages 1025-1036, December.
    13. Maria Durbán & Iain D. Currie, 2003. "A note on P-spline additive models with correlated errors," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 251-262, July.
    14. Xueying Zheng & Wing Fung & Zhongyi Zhu, 2013. "Robust estimation in joint mean–covariance regression model for longitudinal data," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 65(4), pages 617-638, August.
    15. Amato, Umberto & Antoniadis, Anestis & De Feis, Italia & Goude, Yannig & Lagache, Audrey, 2021. "Forecasting high resolution electricity demand data with additive models including smooth and jagged components," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 171-185.
    16. Lee, Dae-Jin & Durbán, María, 2009. "P-spline anova-type interaction models for spatio-temporal smoothing," DES - Working Papers. Statistics and Econometrics. WS ws093312, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Estadística.
    17. Fan, Jianqing & Liao, Yuan & Shi, Xiaofeng, 2015. "Risks of large portfolios," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 186(2), pages 367-387.
    18. Hongxiao Zhu & Philip J. Brown & Jeffrey S. Morris, 2012. "Robust Classification of Functional and Quantitative Image Data Using Functional Mixed Models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 68(4), pages 1260-1268, December.
    19. Jaroslaw Harezlak & Louise M. Ryan & Jay N. Giedd & Nicholas Lange, 2005. "Individual and Population Penalized Regression Splines for Accelerated Longitudinal Designs," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 61(4), pages 1037-1048, December.
    20. repec:cte:wsrepe:24606 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Li, Pai-Ling & Chiou, Jeng-Min & Shyr, Yu, 2017. "Functional data classification using covariate-adjusted subspace projection," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 21-34.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:compst:v:18:y:2003:i:2:d:10.1007_s001800300142. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.