IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/comaot/v9y2003i1d10.1023_bcmot.0000012307.23179.cb.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interpretation by Implementation for Understanding a Multiagent Organization

Author

Listed:
  • Keiki Takadama

    (Tokyo Institute of Technology & ATR Human Information Science Labs)

  • Takao Terano

    (University of Tsukuba)

  • Katsunori Shimohara

    (ATR Human Information Science Labs)

Abstract

This paper stresses the importance of focusing on the modeling process of computational models for precisely understanding a complex organization and for solving given problems in the organization. Based on our claim, we proposes a method of interpretation by implementation (IbI), which explores factors that drastically change simulation results through an investigation on the modeling process of computational models. A careful investigation on the capabilities of the IbI approach, which comprises the three methods of (a) breakdown and representation, (b) assumption or premise modification, and (c) layer change investigation, derives the following conclusions: (1) the IbI approach has the potential of finding underlying factors that determine the characteristics of an organization; (2) the IbI approach can specify points of attention at necessary levels when analyzing an organization; and (3) the IbI approach has suchadvantages as wide applicability, the effective use of employed models, and KISS principle support.

Suggested Citation

  • Keiki Takadama & Takao Terano & Katsunori Shimohara, 2003. "Interpretation by Implementation for Understanding a Multiagent Organization," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 19-35, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:comaot:v:9:y:2003:i:1:d:10.1023_b:cmot.0000012307.23179.cb
    DOI: 10.1023/B:CMOT.0000012307.23179.cb
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1023/B:CMOT.0000012307.23179.cb
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1023/B:CMOT.0000012307.23179.cb?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James G. March, 1991. "Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(1), pages 71-87, February.
    2. Tesfatsion, Leigh, 2001. "Introduction to the special issue on agent-based computational economics," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 25(3-4), pages 281-293, March.
    3. John H. Miller, 1998. "Active Nonlinear Tests (ANTs) of Complex Simulation Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(6), pages 820-830, June.
    4. Keiki Takadama & Takao Terano & Katsunori Shimohara & Koichi Hori & Shinichi Nakasuka, 1999. "Making Organizational Learning Operational: Implications from Learning Classifier Systems," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 5(3), pages 229-252, October.
    5. W. Brian Arthur & Paul Tayler, "undated". "Asset Pricing Under Endogenous Expectations in an Artificial Stock Market," Computing in Economics and Finance 1997 57, Society for Computational Economics.
    6. Joshua M. Epstein & Robert L. Axtell, 1996. "Growing Artificial Societies: Social Science from the Bottom Up," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262550253, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Friederike Wall, 2016. "Agent-based modeling in managerial science: an illustrative survey and study," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 135-193, January.
    2. Anthony Patt & Bernd Siebenhüner, 2005. "Agent Based Modeling and Adaption to Climate Change," Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung / Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 74(2), pages 310-320.
    3. Keiki Takadama & Takao Terano & Katsunori Shimohara & Koichi Hori & Shinichi Nakasuka, 1999. "Making Organizational Learning Operational: Implications from Learning Classifier Systems," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 5(3), pages 229-252, October.
    4. Giannoccaro, Ilaria, 2015. "Adaptive supply chains in industrial districts: A complexity science approach focused on learning," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(PB), pages 576-589.
    5. Benoît Desmarchelier & Faridah Djellal & Faïz Gallouj, 2019. "Users' Involvement in Value Co‐Creation: The More the Better?," Post-Print hal-02354136, HAL.
    6. Tesfatsion, Leigh, 1998. "Teaching Agent-Based Computational Economics to Graduate Students," ISU General Staff Papers 199807010700001043, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    7. Timothy Wojan & Anil Rupasingha, 2001. "Crisis as Opportunity: Local Context, Adaptive Agents and the Possibilities of Rural Development," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(2), pages 141-152.
    8. Pyo, Dong-Jin, 2014. "A Multi-Factor Model of Heterogeneous Traders in a Dynamic Stock Market," Staff General Research Papers Archive 37358, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    9. Robert Axtell, 2007. "What economic agents do: How cognition and interaction lead to emergence and complexity," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 20(2), pages 105-122, September.
    10. Hiroshi Takahashi & Takao Terano, 2003. "Agent-Based Approach to Investors? Behavior and Asset Price Fluctuation in Financial Markets," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 6(3), pages 1-3.
    11. Leigh Tesfatsion, 2002. "Agent-Based Computational Economics," Computational Economics 0203001, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 15 Aug 2002.
    12. D. J. Wu, 2000. "Agent‐based stochastic production lines design," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 9(4), pages 257-270, December.
    13. Filippo Neri, 2020. "How to Identify Investor's types in real financial markets by means of agent based simulation," Papers 2101.03127, arXiv.org.
    14. Alessandro Perrone & Gianluigi Ferraris, 2004. "Intelligent Versus Random Beavers—an Agent‐Based Approach in Facing the Busy Beaver Problem," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(2‐3), pages 332-344, May.
    15. Ke-Hung Lai & Shu-Heng Chen & Ya-Chi Huang, 2005. "Bounded Rationality and the Elasticity Puzzle: What Can We Learn from the Agent-Based Computational Consumption Capital Asset Pricing Model?," Computing in Economics and Finance 2005 207, Society for Computational Economics.
    16. Xi Chen & Qixing Qu & Ming-Hsiang Chen & Shaofen Fang & Yi Cheng, 2018. "The Sustainable Existence of China’s Bicycle-Sharing Market: To Oversupply or to Disappear," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-16, November.
    17. Edoardo Mollona, 2008. "Computer simulation in social sciences," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 12(2), pages 205-211, May.
    18. J. Barkley Rosser, 1999. "On the Complexities of Complex Economic Dynamics," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 13(4), pages 169-192, Fall.
    19. Scott F. Turner & Richard A. Bettis & Richard M. Burton, 2002. "Exploring Depth Versus Breadth in Knowledge Management Strategies," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 49-73, May.
    20. Parkes, David C. & Huberman, Bernardo A., 2001. "Multiagent Cooperative Search for Portfolio Selection," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 35(1-2), pages 124-165, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:comaot:v:9:y:2003:i:1:d:10.1023_b:cmot.0000012307.23179.cb. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.