IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/comaot/v22y2016i2d10.1007_s10588-015-9201-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dialogue strategy for horizontal communication in MAS organization

Author

Listed:
  • Akram Beigi

    (Iran University of Science and Technology)

  • Nasser Mozayani

    (Iran University of Science and Technology)

Abstract

A multi agent organization model defines the structure, roles, interaction ways and coordination styles of a multi agent system. Multi agent organizations may constrain the communication between included members. Organizations’ communication is the process of sending or receiving all the messages through a group of agents in order to achieve common goals. In a dialogue, agents follow some rules that define the permissive speech acts called dialogue protocol. Aiming for common goals, the dialogue strategy is the policy of agents to choose a particular speech act among the allowed ones by the protocol. In this paper a formal model for dialogue strategy for a group of agents in an organization is proposed in order to choose the most preferable speech acts. The argumentation theory is applied to the proposed method to define the values of plausible speech acts and to rank them. The algorithm finds the best option to utter and also it decreases the volume of exchanging messages. The proposed dialogue strategy is illustrated via a deliberation dialogue example in a group of agents.

Suggested Citation

  • Akram Beigi & Nasser Mozayani, 2016. "Dialogue strategy for horizontal communication in MAS organization," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 161-183, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:comaot:v:22:y:2016:i:2:d:10.1007_s10588-015-9201-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s10588-015-9201-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10588-015-9201-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10588-015-9201-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ming-Tse Kuo & Shiue-Der Lu, 2013. "Design and Implementation of Real-Time Intelligent Control and Structure Based on Multi-Agent Systems in Microgrids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(11), pages 1-15, November.
    2. Anda, Martin & Temmen, Justin, 2014. "Smart metering for residential energy efficiency: The use of community based social marketing for behavioural change and smart grid introduction," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 119-127.
    3. Philippe Mathieu & Jean-Christophe Routier & Yann Secq, 2002. "Dynamic organization of multi-agent systems," Post-Print hal-00731955, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ponce, Pedro & Polasko, Kenneth & Molina, Arturo, 2016. "End user perceptions toward smart grid technology: Acceptance, adoption, risks, and trust," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 587-598.
    2. Sourav Khanna & Victor Becerra & Adib Allahham & Damian Giaouris & Jamie M. Foster & Keiron Roberts & David Hutchinson & Jim Fawcett, 2020. "Demand Response Model Development for Smart Households Using Time of Use Tariffs and Optimal Control—The Isle of Wight Energy Autonomous Community Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-27, January.
    3. Hortay, Olivér & Kökény, László, 2020. "A villamosenergia-fogyasztás elhalasztásával kapcsolatos lakossági attitűd felmérése Magyarországon [A survey of popular attitudes to deferment of electricity consumption in Hungary]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(7), pages 657-687.
    4. Wei-Tzer Huang & Kai-Chao Yao & Chun-Ching Wu, 2014. "Using the Direct Search Method for Optimal Dispatch of Distributed Generation in a Medium-Voltage Microgrid," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-19, December.
    5. Ali Hadi Abdulwahid & Shaorong Wang, 2016. "A Novel Approach for Microgrid Protection Based upon Combined ANFIS and Hilbert Space-Based Power Setting," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-25, December.
    6. Calver, Philippa & Simcock, Neil, 2021. "Demand response and energy justice: A critical overview of ethical risks and opportunities within digital, decentralised, and decarbonised futures," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    7. Lucas Roth & Jens Lowitzsch & Özgür Yildiz, 2021. "An Empirical Study of How Household Energy Consumption Is Affected by Co-Owning Different Technological Means to Produce Renewable Energy and the Production Purpose," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-38, July.
    8. van de Kaa, G. & Fens, T. & Rezaei, J. & Kaynak, D. & Hatun, Z. & Tsilimeni-Archangelidi, A., 2019. "Realizing smart meter connectivity: Analyzing the competing technologies Power line communication, mobile telephony, and radio frequency using the best worst method," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 320-327.
    9. Iulia Stamatescu & Nicoleta Arghira & Ioana Făgărăşan & Grigore Stamatescu & Sergiu Stelian Iliescu & Vasile Calofir, 2017. "Decision Support System for a Low Voltage Renewable Energy System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, January.
    10. Rishan Adha & Cheng-Yih Hong & Somya Agrawal & Li-Hua Li, 2023. "ICT, carbon emissions, climate change, and energy demand nexus: The potential benefit of digitalization in Taiwan," Energy & Environment, , vol. 34(5), pages 1619-1638, August.
    11. Francesco, Tinti & Annamaria, Pangallo & Martina, Berneschi & Dario, Tosoni & Dušan, Rajver & Simona, Pestotnik & Dalibor, Jovanović & Tomislav, Rudinica & Slavisa, Jelisić & Branko, Zlokapa & Attilio, 2016. "How to boost shallow geothermal energy exploitation in the adriatic area: the LEGEND project experience," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 190-204.
    12. Mehmet Efe Biresselioglu & Muhittin Hakan Demir & Sebnem Altinci, 2022. "Understanding the Citizen’s Role in the Transition to a Smart Energy System: Are We Ready?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-24, May.
    13. Dileep, G., 2020. "A survey on smart grid technologies and applications," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 2589-2625.
    14. Viana, Matheus Sabino & Manassero, Giovanni & Udaeta, Miguel E.M., 2018. "Analysis of demand response and photovoltaic distributed generation as resources for power utility planning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 456-466.
    15. Francesco Causone & Rossano Scoccia & Martina Pelle & Paola Colombo & Mario Motta & Sibilla Ferroni, 2021. "Neighborhood Energy Modeling and Monitoring: A Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-19, June.
    16. Anna Mengolini & Flavia Gangale & Julija Vasiljevska, 2016. "Exploring Community-Oriented Approaches in Demand Side Management Projects in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-12, December.
    17. Soares, N. & Martins, A.G. & Carvalho, A.L. & Caldeira, C. & Du, C. & Castanheira, É. & Rodrigues, E. & Oliveira, G. & Pereira, G.I. & Bastos, J. & Ferreira, J.P. & Ribeiro, L.A. & Figueiredo, N.C. & , 2018. "The challenging paradigm of interrelated energy systems towards a more sustainable future," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 171-193.
    18. Ahir, Rajesh K. & Chakraborty, Basab, 2021. "A meta-analytic approach for determining the success factors for energy conservation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    19. Serra, Daniele & Mardero, Daniele & Di Stefano, Luca & Grillo, Samuele, 2021. "Post-metering value-added services for low voltage electricity users: Lessons learned from the Italian experience of CHAIN 2," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    20. Maksymilian Kochański & Katarzyna Korczak & Tadeusz Skoczkowski, 2021. "Enablers and Barriers in the Market-Driven Rollout of Smart Metering: Polish Technology Innovation System Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-28, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:comaot:v:22:y:2016:i:2:d:10.1007_s10588-015-9201-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.