IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/climat/v161y2020i4d10.1007_s10584-020-02688-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Will heat stress take its toll on milk production in China?

Author

Listed:
  • Sailesh Ranjitkar

    (Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences
    Chinese Academy of Sciences
    CAAS-ICRAF Joint Lab on Agroforestry and Sustainable Animal Husbandry
    World Agroforestry)

  • Dengpan Bu

    (Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences
    CAAS-ICRAF Joint Lab on Agroforestry and Sustainable Animal Husbandry
    Hunan Co-Innovation Center of Animal Production Safety)

  • Mark Wijk

    (International Livestock Research Institute, ILRI)

  • Ying Ma

    (Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences)

  • Lu Ma

    (Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences
    CAAS-ICRAF Joint Lab on Agroforestry and Sustainable Animal Husbandry)

  • Lianshen Zhao

    (Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences
    CAAS-ICRAF Joint Lab on Agroforestry and Sustainable Animal Husbandry)

  • Jianmin Shi

    (National Animal Husbandry Services)

  • Chousheng Liu

    (National Animal Husbandry Services)

  • Jianchu Xu

    (Chinese Academy of Sciences
    CAAS-ICRAF Joint Lab on Agroforestry and Sustainable Animal Husbandry
    World Agroforestry
    Kunming Institute of Botany)

Abstract

There are clear signs that milk production growth is leveling off, and recently even declining, in China. Heat stress is one of the main reasons for the recent reduction in milk production. In this study, we computed the change in milk production as a result of heat stress in major milk production areas in China. We constructed a temperature–humidity index (THI) spatial layer to understand the monthly distribution of heat and moisture. We documented specific areas in northern China where cattle were at high risk to heat stress in specific months. THI values exceeded the threshold above which milk production declines during months of June, July, and August. Especially during July, the THI value was higher than the production threshold in recent years (2008 to 2016) and in projected future scenarios (2050 and 2070). THI-based milk yield losses were up from 0.7 to about 4 kg per cow per day in July 2016. These losses are projected to increase from 1.5 to 6.5 kg in 2050 and 2 to 7.2 kg in 2070 (representing production losses between 15 and 50%). These results suggest that climate change will have significant consequences for the dairy sector in major milk-producing areas in China. Our results are useful in identifying areas susceptible to heat stress where adaptive livestock management practices are needed to prevent significant production decreases.

Suggested Citation

  • Sailesh Ranjitkar & Dengpan Bu & Mark Wijk & Ying Ma & Lu Ma & Lianshen Zhao & Jianmin Shi & Chousheng Liu & Jianchu Xu, 2020. "Will heat stress take its toll on milk production in China?," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 161(4), pages 637-652, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:climat:v:161:y:2020:i:4:d:10.1007_s10584-020-02688-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s10584-020-02688-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10584-020-02688-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10584-020-02688-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alexandratos, Nikos & Bruinsma, Jelle, 2012. "World agriculture towards 2030/2050: the 2012 revision," ESA Working Papers 288998, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Agricultural Development Economics Division (ESA).
    2. David Tilman & Michael Clark, 2014. "Global diets link environmental sustainability and human health," Nature, Nature, vol. 515(7528), pages 518-522, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chen, Xiaoguang & Cui, Xiaomeng & Gao, Jing, 2023. "Differentiated agricultural sensitivity and adaptability to rising temperatures across regions and sectors in China," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    2. Ting Wang & Rongzhen Zhong & Daowei Zhou, 2020. "Temporal–Spatial Distribution of Risky Sites for Feeding Cattle in China Based on Temperature/Humidity Index," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-13, November.
    3. Vroege, Willemijn & Dalhaus, Tobias & Wauters, Erwin & Finger, Robert, 2023. "Effects of extreme heat on milk quantity and quality," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    4. repec:ags:aaea22:335522 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Huizhao Yang & Sailesh Ranjitkar & Wenxuan Xu & Lei Han & Jianbo Yang & Liqing Wu & Jianchu Xu, 2021. "Crop-climate model in support of adjusting local ecological calendar in the Taxkorgan, eastern Pamir Plateau," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 167(3), pages 1-19, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christophe Gouel & Houssein Guimbard, 2019. "Nutrition Transition and the Structure of Global Food Demand," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 101(2), pages 383-403.
    2. Marco Springmann & Daniel Mason-D’Croz & Sherman Robinson & Keith Wiebe & H Charles J Godfray & Mike Rayner & Peter Scarborough, 2018. "Health-motivated taxes on red and processed meat: A modelling study on optimal tax levels and associated health impacts," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(11), pages 1-16, November.
    3. Bowles, Nicholas & Alexander, Samuel & Hadjikakou, Michalis, 2019. "The livestock sector and planetary boundaries: A ‘limits to growth’ perspective with dietary implications," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 128-136.
    4. Pan He & Beiming Cai & Giovanni Baiocchi & Zhu Liu, 2021. "Drivers of GHG emissions from dietary transition patterns in China: Supply versus demand options," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(3), pages 707-719, June.
    5. Irene Blanco-Gutiérrez & Consuelo Varela-Ortega & Rhys Manners, 2020. "Evaluating Animal-Based Foods and Plant-Based Alternatives Using Multi-Criteria and SWOT Analyses," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-26, October.
    6. Achoja, Felix Odemero & Enujeke, Emmanuel Chukudinife & Ogisi, Oraye Dicta & Overehirha, Rebecca Tega, 2020. "Multinomial Regression Analysis of Yam (Dioscorea Spp.) Consumers' Preferences and Varietal Diversification Pattern in Nigeria," Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, Asian Economic and Social Society (AESS), vol. 10(02), January.
    7. Birgit Kopainsky & Anita Frehner & Adrian Müller, 2020. "Sustainable and healthy diets: Synergies and trade‐offs in Switzerland," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(6), pages 908-927, November.
    8. Gerald Nelson & Jessica Bogard & Keith Lividini & Joanne Arsenault & Malcolm Riley & Timothy B. Sulser & Daniel Mason-D’Croz & Brendan Power & David Gustafson & Mario Herrero & Keith Wiebe & Karen Coo, 2018. "Income growth and climate change effects on global nutrition security to mid-century," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 1(12), pages 773-781, December.
    9. James J Elser & Timothy J Elser & Stephen R Carpenter & William A Brock, 2014. "Regime Shift in Fertilizer Commodities Indicates More Turbulence Ahead for Food Security," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(5), pages 1-7, May.
    10. Vogel, Everton & Martinelli, Gabrielli & Artuzo, Felipe Dalzotto, 2021. "Environmental and economic performance of paddy field-based crop-livestock systems in Southern Brazil," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    11. Dániel Fróna & János Szenderák & Mónika Harangi-Rákos, 2019. "The Challenge of Feeding the World," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-18, October.
    12. Jindřich Špička & Zdeňka Náglová, 2022. "Consumer segmentation in the meat market - The case study of Czech Republic," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 68(2), pages 68-77.
    13. repec:ags:ijag24:346816 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Théodore Nikiema & Eugène C. Ezin & Sylvain Kpenavoun Chogou, 2023. "Bibliometric Analysis of the State of Research on Agroecology Adoption and Methods Used for Its Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-18, November.
    15. Mounir Amdaoud, 2019. "Ressources naturelles, innovation et développement économique : vers une nouvelle approche," CEPN Working Papers 2019-06, Centre d'Economie de l'Université de Paris Nord.
    16. Melanie Speck & Katrin Bienge & Lynn Wagner & Tobias Engelmann & Sebastian Schuster & Petra Teitscheid & Nina Langen, 2020. "Creating Sustainable Meals Supported by the NAHGAST Online Tool—Approach and Effects on GHG Emissions and Use of Natural Resources," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-13, February.
    17. Springmann, Marco & Mason-D'Croz, Daniel & Robinson, Sherman & Wiebe, Keith & Scarborough, Peter, 2016. "The health co-benefits of a global greenhouse-gas tax on food," Conference papers 332766, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    18. repec:ags:aaea22:335681 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Infante-Amate, Juan & Aguilera, Eduardo & de Molina, Manuel González, 2018. "Energy transition in Agri-food systems. Structural change, drivers and policy implications (Spain, 1960–2010)," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 570-579.
    20. Patricia Eustachio Colombo & Emma Patterson & Liselotte Schäfer Elinder & Anna Karin Lindroos & Ulf Sonesson & Nicole Darmon & Alexandr Parlesak, 2019. "Optimizing School Food Supply: Integrating Environmental, Health, Economic, and Cultural Dimensions of Diet Sustainability with Linear Programming," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-18, August.
    21. Victor Nechifor & Matthew Winning, 2017. "The impacts of higher CO2 concentrations over global crop production and irrigation water requirements," EcoMod2017 10487, EcoMod.
    22. Bircol, Guilherme Augusto Carminato & Souza, Marcelo Pereira de & Fontes, Aurélio Teodoro & Chiarello, Adriano Garcia & Ranieri, Victor Eduardo Lima, 2018. "Planning by the rules: A fair chance for the environment in a land-use conflict area," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 103-112.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:climat:v:161:y:2020:i:4:d:10.1007_s10584-020-02688-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.