IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/climat/v142y2017i3d10.1007_s10584-017-1974-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of (quasi-)optimum model parameter sets and model characteristics on future discharge projection of two basins from Europe and Asia

Author

Listed:
  • A. Chamorro

    (Justus Liebig University)

  • P. Kraft

    (Justus Liebig University)

  • G. Pauer

    (Justus Liebig University)

  • J.-F. Exbrayat

    (University of Edinburgh)

  • L. Breuer

    (Justus Liebig University
    Justus Liebig University Giessen)

Abstract

Uncertainty is an inherent, unavoidable feature in the modeling of natural processes. This is particularly a sensitive issue when dealing with forecasting, especially in the context of climate change impacts. Apart from the uncertainty introduced by different climate projections, additional sources of uncertainty have been acknowledged in the literature: driving models, input information, regionalization, parameter choice, downscaling techniques, among others. In this study, we focus as primary goal on the uncertainty introduced by various set of parameters in the twenty-first century projections of runoff in two large river basins: the Rhine in Europe and the Ganges in Asia. For this purpose, we apply a robust parameter estimation optimization algorithm to account for the uncertainty given by a quasi-optimum parameter set choice. A total of 1000 robust and well-performing parameter sets are found and applied for uncertainty analysis. Here we analyze how much discharge projections diverge, given sets of parameters with similar performance. Results suggest that parameter uncertainty is strongly related to model complexity in both basins. To contrast this uncertainty with other important sources, five general circulation models together with four climate change emission scenarios (Representative Concentration Pathways, RCP) are analyzed. Two hydrological models are used as well to test the impact of model conception on uncertainty. Results show that the contribution of parameter choice to uncertainty for the Ganges is rather stable in time and comparatively small for the periods 2006 to 2035, 2036 to 2065, and 2070 to 2099. In the case of Rhine, results are more heterogeneous and change over time, with increasing importance of GCM/RCPs toward the end of the century. Major differences are attributable to GCMs ranging from 60 to 80% followed by RCPs in the range 12–30%, whereas differences due to parameter sets range from 3 to 8%.

Suggested Citation

  • A. Chamorro & P. Kraft & G. Pauer & J.-F. Exbrayat & L. Breuer, 2017. "Effect of (quasi-)optimum model parameter sets and model characteristics on future discharge projection of two basins from Europe and Asia," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 142(3), pages 559-573, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:climat:v:142:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s10584-017-1974-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s10584-017-1974-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10584-017-1974-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10584-017-1974-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tobias Houska & Philipp Kraft & Alejandro Chamorro-Chavez & Lutz Breuer, 2015. "SPOTting Model Parameters Using a Ready-Made Python Package," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(12), pages 1-22, December.
    2. Valentina Krysanova & Fred F. Hattermann, 2017. "Intercomparison of climate change impacts in 12 large river basins: overview of methods and summary of results," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 141(3), pages 363-379, April.
    3. Oja, Hannu, 1983. "Descriptive statistics for multivariate distributions," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 1(6), pages 327-332, October.
    4. Jean-François Exbrayat & Wouter Buytaert & Edison Timbe & David Windhorst & Lutz Breuer, 2014. "Addressing sources of uncertainty in runoff projections for a data scarce catchment in the Ecuadorian Andes," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 125(2), pages 221-235, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jan Niel & E. Uytven & P. Willems, 2019. "Uncertainty Analysis of Climate Change Impact on River Flow Extremes Based on a Large Multi-Model Ensemble," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 33(12), pages 4319-4333, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. G. Zioutas & C. Chatzinakos & T. D. Nguyen & L. Pitsoulis, 2017. "Optimization techniques for multivariate least trimmed absolute deviation estimation," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 781-797, October.
    2. Hwang, Jinsoo & Jorn, Hongsuk & Kim, Jeankyung, 2004. "On the performance of bivariate robust location estimators under contamination," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 44(4), pages 587-601, January.
    3. Masato Okamoto, 2009. "Decomposition of gini and multivariate gini indices," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 7(2), pages 153-177, June.
    4. Averous, Jean & Meste, Michel, 1997. "Median Balls: An Extension of the Interquantile Intervals to Multivariate Distributions," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 63(2), pages 222-241, November.
    5. Eisenberg, Bennett, 2015. "The multivariate Gini ratio," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 292-298.
    6. Myrgiotis, Vasileios & Blei, Emanuel & Clement, Rob & Jones, Stephanie K. & Keane, Ben & Lee, Mark A. & Levy, Peter E. & Rees, Robert M. & Skiba, Ute M. & Smallman, Thomas Luke & Toet, Sylvia & Willia, 2020. "A model-data fusion approach to analyse carbon dynamics in managed grasslands," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    7. Kwiecien, Robert & Gather, Ursula, 2007. "Jensen's inequality for the Tukey median," Technical Reports 2007,07, Technische Universität Dortmund, Sonderforschungsbereich 475: Komplexitätsreduktion in multivariaten Datenstrukturen.
    8. Rainer Dyckerhoff & Christophe Ley & Davy Paindaveine, 2014. "Depth-Based Runs Tests for bivariate Central Symmetry," Working Papers ECARES ECARES 2014-03, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    9. Muhammad Fraz Ismail & Bibi S. Naz & Michel Wortmann & Markus Disse & Laura C. Bowling & Wolfgang Bogacki, 2020. "Comparison of two model calibration approaches and their influence on future projections under climate change in the Upper Indus Basin," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 163(3), pages 1227-1246, December.
    10. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/3qnaslliat80pbqa8t90240unj is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Victor Chernozhukov & Alfred Galichon & Marc Hallin & Marc Henry, 2014. "Monge-Kantorovich Depth, Quantiles, Ranks, and Signs," Papers 1412.8434, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2015.
    12. Belzunce, Félix & Ruiz, José M. & Suárez-Llorens, Alfonso, 2008. "On multivariate dispersion orderings based on the standard construction," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 78(3), pages 271-281, February.
    13. Shen, Gang, 2009. "Asymptotics of a Theil-type estimate in multiple linear regression," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 79(8), pages 1053-1064, April.
    14. Nadja Klein & Thomas Kneib, 2020. "Directional bivariate quantiles: a robust approach based on the cumulative distribution function," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 104(2), pages 225-260, June.
    15. Nadar, M. & Hettmansperger, T. P. & Oja, H., 2003. "The asymptotic covariance matrix of the Oja median," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 64(4), pages 431-442, October.
    16. Zuo, Yijun, 2013. "Multidimensional medians and uniqueness," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 82-88.
    17. Sakineh Dehghan & Mohammad Reza Faridrohani, 2019. "Affine invariant depth-based tests for the multivariate one-sample location problem," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 28(3), pages 671-693, September.
    18. Mangold, Benedikt, 2014. "Plausible prior estimation," FAU Discussion Papers in Economics 09/2014, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Institute for Economics.
    19. Ollila, Esa & Oja, Hannu & Croux, Christophe, 2003. "The affine equivariant sign covariance matrix: asymptotic behavior and efficiencies," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 87(2), pages 328-355, November.
    20. Furno, Marilena, 1998. "Estimating the variance of the LAD regression coefficients," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 11-26, March.
    21. Fan Chen & Guy Nason, 2020. "A new method for computing the projection median, its influence curve and techniques for the production of projected quantile plots," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-22, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:climat:v:142:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s10584-017-1974-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.