IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/circec/v4y2024i2d10.1007_s43615-023-00328-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic Viability Assessment of Small-Scale Biomass Composting Project Within a Developing Country Context

Author

Listed:
  • Albert Banunle

    (Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, University Post Office, PMB, KNUST)

  • Bernard Fei-Baffoe

    (Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, University Post Office, PMB, KNUST)

  • Kodwo Miezah

    (Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, University Post Office, PMB, KNUST)

  • Nana Ewusi-Mensah

    (Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology)

  • Uffe Jørgensen

    (Aarhus University
    Aarhus University Centre for Circular Bioeconomy, Aarhus University)

  • Robert Aidoo

    (Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology)

  • Alice Amoah

    (Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology)

  • Patrick Addo-Fordjour

    (Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology)

  • Robert Clement Abaidoo

    (Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology)

Abstract

Promoting investment in biomass composting is necessary to halt finite resource depletion and transition consumption and production processes into sustainable circular bioeconomy paths. This notwithstanding, there is a lack of demonstrable evidence of the economic viability of such investment, which often disincentivises the adoption of composting and other greener production technologies by entrepreneur. To address this problem, this study evaluates the economic viability of composting as technology for valorising biowaste and tropical aquatic invasive plants in the Owabi catchment in the Ashanti Region of Ghana. Using data from interviews with key informants, pilot study findings and market survey, a cost–benefit analysis (CBA) was performed to determine the economic viability of composting organic waste under public and private ownership models (M1P1 and M1P2, respectively) as well as aquatic invasive plants under similar models (M2P1 and M2P2). The findings show that a positive net present value (NPV) of GHS 507,520.31(US $64,243.08) to GHS 1,217,358.77 (US $154,095.92) is achievable from the alternative scenarios modelled. Each of the scenarios analysed (M1P1, M1P2, M2P1 and M2P2) resulted in a benefit–cost ratio (BCR) greater than 1 and an internal rate of return (IRR) greater than 28%. These results remain robust even with sensitivity analysis based on pessimistic assumptions about costs, benefits, discount rate and project lifespan. The study thus concludes that investing in a small-scale compost production technology with biowaste and aquatic invasive plants as feedstock is a feasible business with positive social, economic and environmental net benefits. Future development in the carbon credit market will make biomass composting even more economically viable to investors and thereby contribute to sustainability and the transition to a circular economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Albert Banunle & Bernard Fei-Baffoe & Kodwo Miezah & Nana Ewusi-Mensah & Uffe Jørgensen & Robert Aidoo & Alice Amoah & Patrick Addo-Fordjour & Robert Clement Abaidoo, 2024. "Economic Viability Assessment of Small-Scale Biomass Composting Project Within a Developing Country Context," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 951-971, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:circec:v:4:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s43615-023-00328-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s43615-023-00328-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s43615-023-00328-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s43615-023-00328-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:circec:v:4:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s43615-023-00328-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.