IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i19p7229-d423202.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Material Flows and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction Potential of Decentralized Composting in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Case Study in Tiassalé, Côte d’Ivoire

Author

Listed:
  • Dotanhan Yeo

    (Unité de Formation et de Recherche des Sciences de la Terre et des Ressources Minières (UFR STRM), Université Félix Houphouët-Boigny, 22 BP 582 Abidjan 22, Cote d’Ivoire
    CSRS: Centre Suisse de Recherches Scientifiques en Côte d’Ivoire, 01 BP 1303 Abidjan 01, Cote d’Ivoire)

  • Kouassi Dongo

    (Unité de Formation et de Recherche des Sciences de la Terre et des Ressources Minières (UFR STRM), Université Félix Houphouët-Boigny, 22 BP 582 Abidjan 22, Cote d’Ivoire
    CSRS: Centre Suisse de Recherches Scientifiques en Côte d’Ivoire, 01 BP 1303 Abidjan 01, Cote d’Ivoire)

  • Adeline Mertenat

    (Eawag: Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, 8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland)

  • Phillipp Lüssenhop

    (Institute of Wastewater Management and Water Protection, Bioresource Management Group, Hamburg University of Technology, Eissendorfer Str. 42, 21073 Hamburg, Germany)

  • Ina Körner

    (Institute of Wastewater Management and Water Protection, Bioresource Management Group, Hamburg University of Technology, Eissendorfer Str. 42, 21073 Hamburg, Germany)

  • Christian Zurbrügg

    (Eawag: Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, 8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland)

Abstract

Despite many composting initiatives implemented in recent years throughout Sub-Saharan Africa, there is yet a lack of data on material flows and the potential contribution of decentralized composting towards greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation. This study fills this gap assessing flows, emissions reduction and other environmental benefits of decentralized composting, based on a pilot composting facility implemented in the municipality of Tiassalé in Côte d’Ivoire. Primary data collected at the site were visualized with the STAN version 2.6 software developed at the Vienna University of Technology (Austria), for material flows, while carbon emissions reduction was estimated using the UNFCCC methods. Results show that in 2017, from the 59.4 metric tons of organic waste processed by this pilot station, 14.2 metric tons of mature compost was produced, which correspond to 24% of the input mass (on wet weight basis). On dry weight basis, mature compost represents 36% of the input mass. The nutrient content of the compost is in line with data from literature on sub-Saharan African compost, and heavy metal contamination fulfils both French and German compost standards. Concerning the GHG emissions reduction potential, the results show that with this composting scenario, 87% of the baseline emissions occurring in open dumping can be avoided.

Suggested Citation

  • Dotanhan Yeo & Kouassi Dongo & Adeline Mertenat & Phillipp Lüssenhop & Ina Körner & Christian Zurbrügg, 2020. "Material Flows and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction Potential of Decentralized Composting in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Case Study in Tiassalé, Côte d’Ivoire," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-15, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:19:p:7229-:d:423202
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/19/7229/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/19/7229/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter L. Daniels & Stephen Moore, 2001. "Approaches for Quantifying the Metabolism of Physical Economies: Part I: Methodological Overview," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 5(4), pages 69-93, October.
    2. Qing Yang & Chen Zuo & Xingxing Liu & Zhichao Yang & Hui Zhou, 2020. "Risk Response for Municipal Solid Waste Crisis Using Ontology-Based Reasoning," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-23, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ariel Gillespie & Anthony Halog, 2023. "Community-Scale Composting Initiatives in South-East Queensland and Beyond: a Review of Successes, Challenges and Lessons for a Pilot Project on Karragarra Island, southern Moreton Bay," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 305-319, March.
    2. Giovanni Vinti & Mentore Vaccari, 2022. "Solid Waste Management in Rural Communities of Developing Countries: An Overview of Challenges and Opportunities," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-14, November.
    3. Yao Li & Yugang He, 2024. "Unraveling Korea’s Energy Challenge: The Consequences of Carbon Dioxide Emissions and Energy Use on Economic Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-29, March.
    4. Albert Banunle & Bernard Fei-Baffoe & Kodwo Miezah & Nana Ewusi-Mensah & Uffe Jørgensen & Robert Aidoo & Alice Amoah & Patrick Addo-Fordjour & Robert Clement Abaidoo, 2024. "Economic Viability Assessment of Small-Scale Biomass Composting Project Within a Developing Country Context," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 951-971, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Haberl, Helmut & Gaube, Veronika & Díaz-Delgado, Ricardo & Krauze, Kinga & Neuner, Angelika & Peterseil, Johannes & Plutzar, Christoph & Singh, Simron J. & Vadineanu, Angheluta, 2009. "Towards an integrated model of socioeconomic biodiversity drivers, pressures and impacts. A feasibility study based on three European long-term socio-ecological research platforms," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(6), pages 1797-1812, April.
    2. Pablo Alonso-Fernández & Rosa María Regueiro-Ferreira, 2021. "An Approximation to the Environmental Impact of Economic Growth Using the Material Flow Analysis: Differences between Production and Consumption Methods, Applied to China, United Kingdom and USA (1990," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-21, May.
    3. Ta-Thi Huong & Liang Dong & Izhar Hussain Shah & Hung-Suck Park, 2021. "Exploring the Sustainability of Resource Flow and Productivity Transition in Vietnam from 1978 to 2017: MFA and DEA-Based Malmquist Productivity Index Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-26, October.
    4. Magnus Andersson & Maria Ljunggren Söderman & Björn A. Sandén, 2019. "Adoption of Systemic and Socio-Technical Perspectives in Waste Management, WEEE and ELV Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-26, March.
    5. Joris Baars & Mohammad Ali Rajaeifar & Oliver Heidrich, 2022. "Quo vadis MFA? Integrated material flow analysis to support material efficiency," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(4), pages 1487-1503, August.
    6. Terje Andersen & Bjørn Jæger, 2021. "Circularity for Electric and Electronic Equipment (EEE), the Edge and Distributed Ledger (Edge&DL) Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-23, September.
    7. Schwarzlmüller, Elmar, 2009. "Human appropriation of aboveground net primary production in Spain, 1955-2003: An empirical analysis of the industrialization of land use," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 282-291, December.
    8. Regueiro-Ferreira, Rosa María & Alonso-Fernández, Pablo, 2023. "Interaction between renewable energy consumption and dematerialization: Insights based on the material footprint and the Environmental Kuznets Curve," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    9. Tsaples, G. & Papathanasiou, J., 2021. "Data envelopment analysis and the concept of sustainability: A review and analysis of the literature," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    10. Alonso-Fernández, Pablo & Regueiro-Ferreira, Rosa María, 2022. "Extractivism, ecologically unequal exchange and environmental impact in South America: A study using Material Flow Analysis (1990–2017)," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:19:p:7229-:d:423202. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.