IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/cejnor/v14y2006i3p247-259.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A communication mix for an event planning: a linear quadratic approach

Author

Listed:
  • Alessandra Buratto
  • Luca Grosset

Abstract

The communication mix is a relevant decision issue for an organization that plans the advertising campaign for a fixed future event. It is assumed that the objectives of the organization are to minimize the cost of the advertising campaign and to drive the final demand as close as possible to a target value. Two different advertising channels are available: the first affects deterministically the consumers’ demand, whereas the second presents some stochastic aspects which are out of decision-maker’s control. Some recent mathematical developments on the stochastic linear quadratic control problem allow to formulate and solve some interesting instances of the problem. A comparative analysis of the efficiency of deterministic and stochastic controls is done and the optimal feedback policies are discussed. The trade-off between efficiency and risk of an advertising channel is essential to understand the features of the optimal solutions. Copyright Physica-Verlag 2006

Suggested Citation

  • Alessandra Buratto & Luca Grosset, 2006. "A communication mix for an event planning: a linear quadratic approach," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 14(3), pages 247-259, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:cejnor:v:14:y:2006:i:3:p:247-259
    DOI: 10.1007/s10100-006-0002-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10100-006-0002-y
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10100-006-0002-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Luca Grosset & Bruno Viscolani, 2004. "Advertising for a new product introduction: A stochastic approach," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 12(1), pages 149-167, June.
    2. Gustav Feichtinger & Richard F. Hartl & Suresh P. Sethi, 1994. "Dynamic Optimal Control Models in Advertising: Recent Developments," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(2), pages 195-226, February.
    3. S. Jørgensen & G. Zaccour, 1999. "Equilibrium Pricing and Advertising Strategies in a Marketing Channel," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 102(1), pages 111-125, July.
    4. Alessandra Buratto & Bruno Viscolani, 2002. "New product introduction: goodwill, time and advertising cost," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 55(1), pages 55-68, March.
    5. Charles S. Tapiero, 1978. "Optimum Advertising and Goodwill under Uncertainty," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 26(3), pages 450-463, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. L. Grosset & B. Viscolani, 2010. "Advertising Events in a Competitive Framework," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 146(2), pages 375-385, August.
    2. Beltran-Royo, C. & Zhang, H. & Blanco, L.A. & Almagro, J., 2013. "Multistage multiproduct advertising budgeting," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 225(1), pages 179-188.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huang, Jian & Leng, Mingming & Liang, Liping, 2012. "Recent developments in dynamic advertising research," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 220(3), pages 591-609.
    2. Marinelli, Carlo, 2007. "The stochastic goodwill problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 176(1), pages 389-404, January.
    3. H. Dharma Kwon & Hongzhong Zhang, 2015. "Game of Singular Stochastic Control and Strategic Exit," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 40(4), pages 869-887, October.
    4. C. Marinelli & S. Savin, 2008. "Optimal Distributed Dynamic Advertising," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 137(3), pages 569-591, June.
    5. Fausto Gozzi & Federica Masiero & Mauro Rosestolato, 2024. "An optimal advertising model with carryover effect and mean field terms," Mathematics and Financial Economics, Springer, volume 18, number 9, December.
    6. Pui Chan Lon & Mihail Zervos, 2011. "A Model for Optimally Advertising and Launching a Product," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 36(2), pages 363-376, May.
    7. R. Cellini & L. Lambertini, 2003. "Advertising in a Differential Oligopoly Game," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 116(1), pages 61-81, January.
    8. Alessandra Buratto & Luca Grosset & Bruno Viscolani, 2007. "Advertising coordination games of a manufacturer and a retailer while introducing a new product," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 15(2), pages 307-321, December.
    9. S. Mosca & B. Viscolani, 2004. "Optimal Goodwill Path to Introduce a New Product," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 123(1), pages 149-162, October.
    10. R. Cellini & L. Lambertini, 2002. "Advertising with Spillover Effects in a Differential Oligopoly Game With Differentiated Goods," Working Papers 430, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.
    11. Chenavaz, Régis Y. & Eynan, Amit, 2021. "Advertising, goodwill, and the Veblen effect," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 289(2), pages 676-682.
    12. Buratto, Alessandra & Grosset, Luca & Viscolani, Bruno, 2006. "Advertising a new product in a segmented market," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(2), pages 1262-1267, December.
    13. Philipp Afèche & Mojtaba Araghi & Opher Baron, 2017. "Customer Acquisition, Retention, and Service Access Quality: Optimal Advertising, Capacity Level, and Capacity Allocation," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 674-691, October.
    14. Navdeep Sahni, 2015. "Effect of temporal spacing between advertising exposures: Evidence from online field experiments," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 203-247, September.
    15. Mauro Bambi & Cristina Girolami & Salvatore Federico & Fausto Gozzi, 2017. "Generically distributed investments on flexible projects and endogenous growth," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 63(2), pages 521-558, February.
    16. Beltran-Royo, C. & Zhang, H. & Blanco, L.A. & Almagro, J., 2013. "Multistage multiproduct advertising budgeting," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 225(1), pages 179-188.
    17. Prasad A. Naik & Murali K. Mantrala & Alan G. Sawyer, 1998. "Planning Media Schedules in the Presence of Dynamic Advertising Quality," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(3), pages 214-235.
    18. Richards, Timothy J. & Patterson, Paul M., 2000. "New Varieties And The Returns To Commodity Promotion: The Case Of Fuji Apples," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 29(1), pages 1-14, April.
    19. G. Bertuzzi & L. Lambertini, 2001. "Advertising in a Differential Game of Spatial Competition," Working Papers 400, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.
    20. Jorgensen, Steffen & Kort, Peter M., 2002. "Optimal pricing and inventory policies: Centralized and decentralized decision making," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 138(3), pages 578-600, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:cejnor:v:14:y:2006:i:3:p:247-259. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.