IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v340y2024i1d10.1007_s10479-024-05861-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparisons of coherent systems with active redundancy and component lifetimes following the proportional odds model

Author

Listed:
  • Arindam Panja

    (SQC & OR Unit, Indian Statistical Institute)

  • Pradip Kundu

    (XIM University)

  • Biswabrata Pradhan

    (SQC & OR Unit, Indian Statistical Institute)

Abstract

The use of redundancies or spares in a system is a widely adopted technique to enhance system reliability and reduce the risk of system failure. Redundancies are typically incorporated into systems at the component or system levels. It is a significant problem to allocate appropriate redundancies into a system from a set of available options for the same. In this paper, we establish sufficient conditions to compare the reliability of coherent systems of dependent components with different sets of active redundancy, whether at the component level or the system level, based on some stochastic orders. We have obtained the results for the component lifetimes following the proportional odds (PO) model (the Marshall–Olkin family of distributions) for any lifetime distribution as a baseline distribution. We have studied the problem in the most general setup, with the consideration of coherent system that includes most of the common system structures, the consideration of non-matching spares, the consideration of dependencies of the components with different associated parameters of the copulas, and the consideration of general distribution as the baseline distribution of the PO model. We provide examples satisfying the sufficient conditions of the theoretical results. Additionally, we illustrate some of the results using real-world data.

Suggested Citation

  • Arindam Panja & Pradip Kundu & Biswabrata Pradhan, 2024. "Comparisons of coherent systems with active redundancy and component lifetimes following the proportional odds model," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 340(1), pages 367-387, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:340:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-024-05861-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-024-05861-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-024-05861-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-024-05861-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Isidro Jesús González-Hernández & Rafael Granillo-Macías & Carlos Rondero-Guerrero & Isaías Simón-Marmolejo, 2021. "Marshall-Olkin distributions: a bibliometric study," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(11), pages 9005-9029, November.
    2. S. Kirmani & Ramesh Gupta, 2001. "On the Proportional Odds Model in Survival Analysis," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 53(2), pages 203-216, June.
    3. Hamideh Jeddi & Mahdi Doostparast, 2022. "Allocation of redundancies in systems: a general dependency-base framework," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 312(1), pages 259-273, May.
    4. Genest, Christian & Rémillard, Bruno & Beaudoin, David, 2009. "Goodness-of-fit tests for copulas: A review and a power study," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 199-213, April.
    5. Abedin Haidari & Amir T. Payandeh Najafabadi & Narayanaswamy Balakrishnan, 2019. "Comparisons between parallel systems with exponentiated generalized gamma components," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(6), pages 1316-1332, March.
    6. Sara Ghanbari & Abdolhamid Rezaei Roknabadi & Mahdi Salehi, 2022. "Estimation of stress–strength reliability for Marshall–Olkin distributions based on progressively Type-II censored samples," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(8), pages 1913-1934, June.
    7. Jorge Navarro, 2016. "Stochastic comparisons of generalized mixtures and coherent systems," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 25(1), pages 150-169, March.
    8. M. E. Ghitany & E. K. Al-Hussaini & R. A. Al-Jarallah, 2005. "Marshall-Olkin extended weibull distribution and its application to censored data," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(10), pages 1025-1034.
    9. Chrys Caroni, 2010. "Testing for the Marshall–Olkin extended form of the Weibull distribution," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 325-336, June.
    10. Hazra, Nil Kamal & Finkelstein, Maxim & Cha, Ji Hwan, 2017. "On optimal grouping and stochastic comparisons for heterogeneous items," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 146-156.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nanda, Asok K. & Das, Suchismita, 2012. "Stochastic orders of the Marshall–Olkin extended distribution," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 82(2), pages 295-302.
    2. Gauss Cordeiro & Artur Lemonte, 2013. "On the Marshall–Olkin extended Weibull distribution," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 54(2), pages 333-353, May.
    3. Omid Shojaee & Majid Asadi & Maxim Finkelstein, 2021. "On Some Properties of $$\alpha $$ α -Mixtures," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 84(8), pages 1213-1240, November.
    4. Jie Huang & Haiming Zhou & Nader Ebrahimi, 2022. "Bayesian Bivariate Cure Rate Models Using Copula Functions," International Journal of Statistics and Probability, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(3), pages 1-9, May.
    5. Bedoui, Rihab & Braiek, Sana & Guesmi, Khaled & Chevallier, Julien, 2019. "On the conditional dependence structure between oil, gold and USD exchange rates: Nested copula based GJR-GARCH model," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 876-889.
    6. Boikanyo Makubate & Fastel Chipepa & Broderick Oluyede & Peter O. Peter, 2021. "The Marshall-Olkin Half Logistic-G Family of Distributions With Applications," International Journal of Statistics and Probability, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(2), pages 120-120, March.
    7. Okhrin, Ostap & Ristig, Alexander, 2014. "Hierarchical Archimedean Copulae: The HAC Package," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 58(i04).
    8. Wu, Shaomin, 2014. "Construction of asymmetric copulas and its application in two-dimensional reliability modelling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 238(2), pages 476-485.
    9. Katarzyna Baran-Gurgul, 2022. "The Risk of Extreme Streamflow Drought in the Polish Carpathians—A Two-Dimensional Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-27, October.
    10. Luca Riccetti, 2013. "A copula–GARCH model for macro asset allocation of a portfolio with commodities," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 1315-1336, June.
    11. Daniel Puig & Oswaldo Morales-Nápoles & Fatemeh Bakhtiari & Gissela Landa, 2017. "The accountability imperative for quantifiying the uncertainty of emission forecasts : evidence from Mexico," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-03389325, HAL.
    12. Wanling Huang & Artem Prokhorov, 2014. "A Goodness-of-fit Test for Copulas," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(7), pages 751-771, October.
    13. Hadeel S Klakattawi, 2022. "Survival analysis of cancer patients using a new extended Weibull distribution," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(2), pages 1-20, February.
    14. Kleinow, Jacob & Moreira, Fernando, 2016. "Systemic risk among European banks: A copula approach," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 27-42.
    15. Xun Lu & Kin Lai & Liang Liang, 2014. "Portfolio value-at-risk estimation in energy futures markets with time-varying copula-GARCH model," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 219(1), pages 333-357, August.
    16. Emmanoulides, Christos & Fousekis, Panos, 2014. "Vertical Price Transmission in the US Pork Industry: Evidence from Copula Models," Agricultural Economics Review, Greek Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12.
    17. Peter Grundke & Kamil Pliszka, 2018. "A macroeconomic reverse stress test," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 50(4), pages 1093-1130, May.
    18. Saralees Nadarajah & Božidar Popović & Miroslav Ristić, 2013. "Compounding: an R package for computing continuous distributions obtained by compounding a continuous and a discrete distribution," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 977-992, June.
    19. Kelly, Robert & McCarthy, Yvonne & McQuinn, Kieran, 2012. "Impairment and negative equity in the Irish mortgage market," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 256-268.
    20. Isidro Jesús González-Hernández & Luis Carlos Méndez-González & Rafael Granillo-Macías & José Luis Rodríguez-Muñoz & José Sergio Pacheco-Cedeño, 2024. "A New Generalization of the Uniform Distribution: Properties and Applications to Lifetime Data," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-26, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:340:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-024-05861-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.