IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/oropre/v47y1999i1p38-53.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Applying Experimental Design and Regression Splines to High-Dimensional Continuous-State Stochastic Dynamic Programming

Author

Listed:
  • Victoria C. P. Chen

    (Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia)

  • David Ruppert

    (Cornell University, Ithaca, New York)

  • Christine A. Shoemaker

    (Cornell University, Ithaca, New York)

Abstract

In stochastic dynamic programming (SDP) with continuous state and decision variables, the future value function is computed at discrete points in the state space. Interpolation can be used to approximate the values of the future value function between these discrete points. However, for large dimensional problems the number of discrete points required to obtain a good approximation of the future value function can be prohibitively large. Statistical methods of experimental design and function estimation may be employed to overcome this “curse of dimensionality.” In this paper, we describe a method for estimating the future value function by multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS) fit over a discretization scheme based on orthogonal array (OA) experimental designs. Because orthogonal arrays only grow polynomially in the state-space dimension, our OA/MARS method is accurately able to solve higher dimensional SDP problems than previously possible. To our knowledge, the most efficient method published prior to this work employs tensor-product cubic splines to approximate the future value function (Johnson et al. 1993). The computational advantages of OA/MARS are demonstrated in comparisons with the method using tensor-product cubic splines for applications of an inventory forecasting SDP with up to nine state variables computed on a small workstation. In particular, the storage of an adequate tensor-product cubic spline for six dimensions exceeds the memory of our workstation, and the run time for an accurate OA/MARS SDP solution would be at least an order of magnitude faster than using tensor-product cubic splines for higher than six dimensions.

Suggested Citation

  • Victoria C. P. Chen & David Ruppert & Christine A. Shoemaker, 1999. "Applying Experimental Design and Regression Splines to High-Dimensional Continuous-State Stochastic Dynamic Programming," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 47(1), pages 38-53, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:47:y:1999:i:1:p:38-53
    DOI: 10.1287/opre.47.1.38
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.47.1.38
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/opre.47.1.38?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. D. J. White, 1988. "Further Real Applications of Markov Decision Processes," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 18(5), pages 55-61, October.
    2. Sharon A. Johnson & Jery R. Stedinger & Christine A. Shoemaker & Ying Li & José Alberto Tejada-Guibert, 1993. "Numerical Solution of Continuous-State Dynamic Programs Using Linear and Spline Interpolation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 41(3), pages 484-500, June.
    3. Douglas J. White, 1985. "Real Applications of Markov Decision Processes," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 15(6), pages 73-83, December.
    4. Chen, Victoria C. P., 1999. "Application of orthogonal arrays and MARS to inventory forecasting stochastic dynamic programs," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 317-341, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Victoria C. P., 1999. "Application of orthogonal arrays and MARS to inventory forecasting stochastic dynamic programs," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 317-341, May.
    2. Kao, Jih-Forg, 1995. "Optimal recovery strategies for manufacturing systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 80(2), pages 252-263, January.
    3. Cervellera, Cristiano & Chen, Victoria C.P. & Wen, Aihong, 2006. "Optimization of a large-scale water reservoir network by stochastic dynamic programming with efficient state space discretization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 171(3), pages 1139-1151, June.
    4. Zong-Zhi Lin & James C. Bean & Chelsea C. White, 2004. "A Hybrid Genetic/Optimization Algorithm for Finite-Horizon, Partially Observed Markov Decision Processes," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 16(1), pages 27-38, February.
    5. Epaminondas G. Kyriakidis & Theodosis D. Dimitrakos, 2005. "Computation of the Optimal Policy for the Control of a Compound Immigration Process through Total Catastrophes," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 97-118, March.
    6. So, Meko M.C. & Thomas, Lyn C., 2011. "Modelling the profitability of credit cards by Markov decision processes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 212(1), pages 123-130, July.
    7. Rolando Cavazos-Cadena & Mario Cantú-Sifuentes & Imelda Cerda-Delgado, 2021. "Nash equilibria in a class of Markov stopping games with total reward criterion," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 94(2), pages 319-340, October.
    8. Kristensen, Dennis & Mogensen, Patrick K. & Moon, Jong Myun & Schjerning, Bertel, 2021. "Solving dynamic discrete choice models using smoothing and sieve methods," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 223(2), pages 328-360.
    9. Per Krusell & Anthony A. Smith & Jr., 1998. "Income and Wealth Heterogeneity in the Macroeconomy," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 106(5), pages 867-896, October.
    10. Khan, Aubhik & Thomas, Julia K., 2003. "Nonconvex factor adjustments in equilibrium business cycle models: do nonlinearities matter?," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 331-360, March.
    11. Drouin, Nicol & Gautier, Antoine & Lamond, Bernard F. & Lang, Pascal, 1996. "Piecewise affine approximations for the control of a one-reservoir hydroelectric system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(1), pages 53-69, February.
    12. Gianluca Benigno & Huigang Chen & Christopher Otrok & Alessandro Rebucci & Eric R. Young, 2011. "Revisiting Overborrowing and its Policy Implications," Central Banking, Analysis, and Economic Policies Book Series, in: Luis Felipe Céspedes & Roberto Chang & Diego Saravia (ed.),Monetary Policy under Financial Turbulence, edition 1, volume 16, chapter 6, pages 145-184, Central Bank of Chile.
    13. Chernonog, Tatyana & Avinadav, Tal, 2016. "A two-state partially observable Markov decision process with three actionsAuthor-Name: Ben-Zvi, Tal," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 254(3), pages 957-967.
    14. King, Robert P. & Lohano, Heman D., 2006. "Accuracy of Numerical Solution to Dynamic Programming Models," Staff Papers 14230, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    15. Lars Grüne & Willi Semmler, 2007. "Asset pricing with dynamic programming," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 29(3), pages 233-265, May.
    16. Luckny Zephyr & Bernard F. Lamond & Pascal Lang, 2024. "Hybrid simplicial-randomized approximate stochastic dynamic programming for multireservoir optimization," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 1-44, June.
    17. Pontus Rendahl, 2015. "Inequality Constraints and Euler Equation‐based Solution Methods," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 125(585), pages 1110-1135, June.
    18. Huiyuan Fan & Prashant K. Tarun & Victoria C. P. Chen & Dachuan T. Shih & Jay M. Rosenberger & Seoung Bum Kim & Robert A. Horton, 2018. "Data-driven optimization for Dallas Fort Worth International Airport deicing activities," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 263(1), pages 361-384, April.
    19. Judd, Kenneth L., 1997. "Computational economics and economic theory: Substitutes or complements?," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 21(6), pages 907-942, June.
    20. Yates, C.M. & Rehman, T., 1998. "A linear programming formulation of the Markovian decision process approach to modelling the dairy replacement problem," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 58(2), pages 185-201, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:47:y:1999:i:1:p:38-53. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.