IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v265y2018i1d10.1007_s10479-017-2721-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficient solution of many instances of a simulation-based optimization problem utilizing a partition of the decision space

Author

Listed:
  • Zuzana Nedělková

    (Chalmers University of Technology and University of Gothenburg)

  • Peter Lindroth

    (Volvo Group Trucks Technology)

  • Michael Patriksson

    (Chalmers University of Technology and University of Gothenburg)

  • Ann-Brith Strömberg

    (Chalmers University of Technology and University of Gothenburg)

Abstract

This paper concerns the solution of a class of mathematical optimization problems with simulation-based objective functions. The decision variables are partitioned into two groups, referred to as variables and parameters, respectively, such that the objective function value is influenced more by the variables than by the parameters. We aim to solve this optimization problem for a large number of parameter settings in a computationally efficient way. The algorithm developed uses surrogate models of the objective function for a selection of parameter settings, for each of which it computes an approximately optimal solution over the domain of the variables. Then, approximate optimal solutions for other parameter settings are computed through a weighting of the surrogate models without requiring additional expensive function evaluations. We have tested the algorithm’s performance on a set of global optimization problems differing with respect to both mathematical properties and numbers of variables and parameters. Our results show that it outperforms a standard and often applied approach based on a surrogate model of the objective function over the complete space of variables and parameters.

Suggested Citation

  • Zuzana Nedělková & Peter Lindroth & Michael Patriksson & Ann-Brith Strömberg, 2018. "Efficient solution of many instances of a simulation-based optimization problem utilizing a partition of the decision space," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 265(1), pages 93-118, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:265:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-017-2721-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-017-2721-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-017-2721-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-017-2721-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Benoît Colson & Patrice Marcotte & Gilles Savard, 2007. "An overview of bilevel optimization," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 153(1), pages 235-256, September.
    2. L. Jeff Hong & Barry L. Nelson & Jie Xu, 2015. "Discrete Optimization via Simulation," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Michael C Fu (ed.), Handbook of Simulation Optimization, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 9-44, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shivam Gupta & Sachin Modgil & Samadrita Bhattacharyya & Indranil Bose, 2022. "Artificial intelligence for decision support systems in the field of operations research: review and future scope of research," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 308(1), pages 215-274, January.
    2. Piotr Cheluszka & Amadeus Jagieła-Zając, 2022. "Identification of a Mathematical Model for the Transformation of Images for Stereo Correspondence Measurements of Mining Equipment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-24, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andreas Lanz & Gregor Reich & Ole Wilms, 2022. "Adaptive grids for the estimation of dynamic models," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 179-238, June.
    2. Shi, Yi & Deng, Yawen & Wang, Guoan & Xu, Jiuping, 2020. "Stackelberg equilibrium-based eco-economic approach for sustainable development of kitchen waste disposal with subsidy policy: A case study from China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    3. Lucio Bianco & Massimiliano Caramia & Stefano Giordani & Veronica Piccialli, 2016. "A Game-Theoretic Approach for Regulating Hazmat Transportation," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(2), pages 424-438, May.
    4. Xu, Jiuping & Shu, Kejing & Wang, Fengjuan & Yang, Guocan, 2024. "Bi-level multi-objective distribution strategy integrating the permit trading scheme towards coal production capacity layout optimization: Case study from China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    5. Preil, Deniz & Krapp, Michael, 2022. "Bandit-based inventory optimisation: Reinforcement learning in multi-echelon supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    6. Cerulli, Martina & Serra, Domenico & Sorgente, Carmine & Archetti, Claudia & Ljubić, Ivana, 2023. "Mathematical programming formulations for the Collapsed k-Core Problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(1), pages 56-72.
    7. Chan Y. Han & Brian J. Lunday & Matthew J. Robbins, 2016. "A Game Theoretic Model for the Optimal Location of Integrated Air Defense System Missile Batteries," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 28(3), pages 405-416, August.
    8. Lorenzo Lampariello & Simone Sagratella, 2015. "It is a matter of hierarchy: a Nash equilibrium problem perspective on bilevel programming," DIAG Technical Reports 2015-07, Department of Computer, Control and Management Engineering, Universita' degli Studi di Roma "La Sapienza".
    9. Grimm, Veronika & Schewe, Lars & Schmidt, Martin & Zöttl, Gregor, 2017. "Uniqueness of market equilibrium on a network: A peak-load pricing approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(3), pages 971-983.
    10. Wei Jiang & Huiqiang Wang & Bingyang Li & Haibin Lv & Qingchuan Meng, 2020. "A multi-user multi-operator computing pricing method for Internet of things based on bi-level optimization," International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, , vol. 16(1), pages 15501477199, January.
    11. Flötteröd, Gunnar, 2017. "A search acceleration method for optimization problems with transport simulation constraints," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 239-260.
    12. Lei Fang & Hecheng Li, 2013. "Lower bound of cost efficiency measure in DEA with incomplete price information," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 40(2), pages 219-226, October.
    13. Vivek Laha & Harsh Narayan Singh, 2023. "On quasidifferentiable mathematical programs with equilibrium constraints," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 1-20, December.
    14. Nair, Rahul & Miller-Hooks, Elise, 2014. "Equilibrium network design of shared-vehicle systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(1), pages 47-61.
    15. Mahdi Zarghami & Nasim Safari & Ferenc Szidarovszky & Shafiqul Islam, 2015. "Nonlinear Interval Parameter Programming Combined with Cooperative Games: a Tool for Addressing Uncertainty in Water Allocation Using Water Diplomacy Framework," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 29(12), pages 4285-4303, September.
    16. Magnus Hoffmann & Grégoire Rota‐Graziosi, 2020. "Endogenous timing in the presence of non‐monotonicities," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(1), pages 359-402, February.
    17. Yuwei Zhou & Sigrún Andradóttir & Seong-Hee Kim & Chuljin Park, 2022. "Finding Feasible Systems for Subjective Constraints Using Recycled Observations," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(6), pages 3080-3095, November.
    18. Küçükaydin, Hande & Aras, Necati & Kuban AltInel, I., 2011. "Competitive facility location problem with attractiveness adjustment of the follower: A bilevel programming model and its solution," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 208(3), pages 206-220, February.
    19. Baringo, L. & Conejo, A.J., 2011. "Wind power investment within a market environment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(9), pages 3239-3247.
    20. Hirotaka Takano & Ryosuke Hayashi & Hiroshi Asano & Tadahiro Goda, 2021. "Optimal Sizing of Battery Energy Storage Systems Considering Cooperative Operation with Microgrid Components," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-13, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:265:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-017-2721-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.