IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v258y2017i2d10.1007_s10479-016-2384-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact on yard efficiency of a truck appointment system for a port terminal

Author

Listed:
  • Adrián Ramírez-Nafarrate

    (ITAM)

  • Rosa G. González-Ramírez

    (Universidad de Los Andes Chile)

  • Neale R. Smith

    (Tecnológico de Monterrey)

  • Roberto Guerra-Olivares

    (Tecnológico de Monterrey)

  • Stefan Voß

    (University of Hamburg
    Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso)

Abstract

Port terminals consist of two interfaces for transferring cargo among transport modes: (1) the seaside or quayside interface and (2) the landside interface. At the seaside interface, cargo is loaded and unloaded from the vessels and stored temporarily at the yard. Landside operations consist of receiving and dispatching cargo from external trucks and rail. The increasing volumes of international trade are demanding more efficient cargo handling throughout the port logistic chain and coordination with the hinterland, hence attracting more attention from both practitioners and researchers on the landside interface of ports. Due to the high variability of truck arrivals with a significant concentration at peak hours, congestion at the access gates of ports and an unbalanced utilization of the resources occur. Truck appointment systems (TAS) have already been implemented in some ports as a coordination mechanism to reduce congestion at ports, balance demand and capacity, and reduce truck turnaround times. Based on the current situation faced by the Port of Arica, Chile, this paper aims to analyze potential configurations of a TAS and evaluate its impacts on yard operations, specifically in the reduction of container rehandles, as well as truck turnaround times. For this, a discrete-event simulation model and a heuristic procedure are proposed and experimentation is performed using historical data from the port terminal. Results indicate that implementing a TAS may significantly benefit yard operations in terms of reducing container rehandles as well as truck waiting times.

Suggested Citation

  • Adrián Ramírez-Nafarrate & Rosa G. González-Ramírez & Neale R. Smith & Roberto Guerra-Olivares & Stefan Voß, 2017. "Impact on yard efficiency of a truck appointment system for a port terminal," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 258(2), pages 195-216, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:258:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s10479-016-2384-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-016-2384-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-016-2384-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-016-2384-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gang Chen & Zhongzhen Yang, 2010. "Optimizing time windows for managing export container arrivals at Chinese container terminals," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 12(1), pages 111-126, March.
    2. repec:idb:brikps:66898 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Lehnfeld, Jana & Knust, Sigrid, 2014. "Loading, unloading and premarshalling of stacks in storage areas: Survey and classification," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(2), pages 297-312.
    4. Bierwirth, Christian & Meisel, Frank, 2010. "A survey of berth allocation and quay crane scheduling problems in container terminals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(3), pages 615-627, May.
    5. repec:idb:brikps:publication-detail,7101.html?id=40686 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. C. Cheong & K. Tan & D. Liu & C. Lin, 2010. "Multi-objective and prioritized berth allocation in container ports," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 180(1), pages 63-103, November.
    7. Mordecai Avriel & Michal Penn & Naomi Shpirer & Smadar Witteboon, 1998. "Stowage planning for container ships to reduce the number of shifts," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 76(0), pages 55-71, January.
    8. Phan, Mai-Ha & Kim, Kap Hwan, 2016. "Collaborative truck scheduling and appointments for trucking companies and container terminals," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 37-50.
    9. Zhao, Wenjuan & Goodchild, Anne V., 2010. "The impact of truck arrival information on container terminal rehandling," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 327-343, May.
    10. Zehendner, Elisabeth & Feillet, Dominique, 2014. "Benefits of a truck appointment system on the service quality of inland transport modes at a multimodal container terminal," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 461-469.
    11. Chen, Gang & Govindan, Kannan & Yang, Zhongzhen, 2013. "Managing truck arrivals with time windows to alleviate gate congestion at container terminals," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(1), pages 179-188.
    12. Phan, Mai-Ha & Kim, Kap Hwan, 2015. "Negotiating truck arrival times among trucking companies and a container terminal," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 132-144.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Azab, Ahmed & Morita, Hiroshi, 2022. "Coordinating truck appointments with container relocations and retrievals in container terminals under partial appointments information," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    2. Azab, Ahmed & Morita, Hiroshi, 2022. "The block relocation problem with appointment scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(2), pages 680-694.
    3. Romero-Silva, Rodrigo & Mujica Mota, Miguel, 2022. "Trade-offs in the landside operations of air cargo hubs: Horizontal cooperation and shipment consolidation policies considering capacitated nodes," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    4. Nellen, Nicole & Poeting, Moritz & Bschorer, Kristina & Jahn, Carlos & Clausen, Uwe, 2020. "Impact of port layouts on inter-terminal-transportation networks," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Jahn, Carlos & Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Data Science in Maritime and City Logistics: Data-driven Solutions for Logistics and Sustainability. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conferen, volume 30, pages 181-209, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    5. Chen, Rui & Meng, Qiang & Jia, Peng, 2022. "Container port drayage operations and management: Past and future," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    6. Lange, Ann-Kathrin & Nellen, Nicole & Jahn, Carlos, 2022. "Truck appointment systems: How can they be improved and what are their limits?," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Kersten, Wolfgang & Jahn, Carlos & Blecker, Thorsten & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Changing Tides: The New Role of Resilience and Sustainability in Logistics and Supply Chain Management – Innovative Approaches for the Shift to a New , volume 33, pages 615-655, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    7. Amir Gharehgozli & Nima Zaerpour & Rene Koster, 2020. "Container terminal layout design: transition and future," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(4), pages 610-639, December.
    8. Dawn Russell & Kusumal Ruamsook & Violeta Roso, 2022. "Managing supply chain uncertainty by building flexibility in container port capacity: a logistics triad perspective and the COVID-19 case," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 24(1), pages 92-113, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amir Gharehgozli & Nima Zaerpour & Rene Koster, 2020. "Container terminal layout design: transition and future," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(4), pages 610-639, December.
    2. Azab, Ahmed & Morita, Hiroshi, 2022. "The block relocation problem with appointment scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(2), pages 680-694.
    3. Torkjazi, Mohammad & Huynh, Nathan & Shiri, Samaneh, 2018. "Truck appointment systems considering impact to drayage truck tours," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 208-228.
    4. Xiaoju Zhang & Qingcheng Zeng & Zhongzhen Yang, 2019. "Optimization of truck appointments in container terminals," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 21(1), pages 125-145, March.
    5. María D. Gracia & Rosa G. González-Ramírez & Julio Mar-Ortiz, 2017. "The impact of lanes segmentation and booking levels on a container terminal gate congestion," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 403-432, December.
    6. Li, Dongjun & Dong, Jing-Xin & Song, Dong-Ping & Hicks, Christian & Singh, Surya Prakash, 2020. "Optimal contract design for the exchange of tradable truck permits at multiterminal ports," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    7. Lange, Ann-Kathrin & Nellen, Nicole & Jahn, Carlos, 2022. "Truck appointment systems: How can they be improved and what are their limits?," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Kersten, Wolfgang & Jahn, Carlos & Blecker, Thorsten & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Changing Tides: The New Role of Resilience and Sustainability in Logistics and Supply Chain Management – Innovative Approaches for the Shift to a New , volume 33, pages 615-655, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    8. Mohammad Torkjazi & Nathan Huynh & Ali Asadabadi, 2022. "Modeling the Truck Appointment System as a Multi-Player Game," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-25, July.
    9. Azab, Ahmed & Morita, Hiroshi, 2022. "Coordinating truck appointments with container relocations and retrievals in container terminals under partial appointments information," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    10. Caldeira dos Santos, Murillo & Pereira, Fábio Henrique, 2021. "Development and application of a dynamic model for road port access and its impacts on port-city relationship indicators," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    11. Branislav Dragović & Ernestos Tzannatos & Nam Kuy Park, 2017. "Simulation modelling in ports and container terminals: literature overview and analysis by research field, application area and tool," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 4-34, March.
    12. Mar-Ortiz, Julio & Castillo-García, Norberto & Gracia, María D., 2020. "A decision support system for a capacity management problem at a container terminal," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    13. Facchini, F. & Digiesi, S. & Mossa, G., 2020. "Optimal dry port configuration for container terminals: A non-linear model for sustainable decision making," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 164-178.
    14. Gharehgozli, A.H. & Roy, D. & de Koster, M.B.M., 2014. "Sea Container Terminals," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2014-009-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    15. Caballini, Claudia & Gracia, Maria D. & Mar-Ortiz, Julio & Sacone, Simona, 2020. "A combined data mining – optimization approach to manage trucks operations in container terminals with the use of a TAS: Application to an Italian and a Mexican port," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    16. Sanghyuk Yi & Bernd Scholz-Reiter & Taehoon Kim & Kap Hwan Kim, 2019. "Scheduling appointments for container truck arrivals considering their effects on congestion," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 31(3), pages 730-762, September.
    17. Bowei Xu & Xiaoyan Liu & Yongsheng Yang & Junjun Li & Octavian Postolache, 2021. "Optimization for a Multi-Constraint Truck Appointment System Considering Morning and Evening Peak Congestion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-19, January.
    18. Chen, Rui & Meng, Qiang & Jia, Peng, 2022. "Container port drayage operations and management: Past and future," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    19. Gang Chen & Liping Jiang, 2016. "Managing customer arrivals with time windows: a case of truck arrivals at a congested container terminal," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 244(2), pages 349-365, September.
    20. Roy, Debjit & van Ommeren, Jan-Kees & de Koster, René & Gharehgozli, Amir, 2022. "Modeling landside container terminal queues: Exact analysis and approximations," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 73-102.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:258:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s10479-016-2384-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.