IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v240y2016i1d10.1007_s10479-015-2011-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On scheduling with the non-idling constraint

Author

Listed:
  • Philippe Chrétienne

    (Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06
    CNRS, UMR 7606, LIP6)

Abstract

In this paper, we give an overview of the main results obtained on the complexity of scheduling under the non-idling constraint, i.e, when the jobs assigned to each machine must be processed with no intermediate delay. That constraint is met in practice when the cost of intermediate idle time is too high due to the idle time itself and/or the machine restarting. The non idling constraint is a strong constraint that often needs a new solving approach and most results about classical scheduling problems do not easily extend to the non-idling variant of the problem. In this survey, we mainly consider the non-idling variants of the basic scheduling problems. So, we first present basic properties, complexity results and some algorithms concerning the one-machine non-idling scheduling problem. Then we consider the m-machine non idling scheduling problem. We show that a few basic problems may be solved by rather easy extensions of the algorithm solving their classical counterpart. However, the complexity status of the non idling version of quite easy polynomial basic problems remains an open question. We finally consider a more constrained version of non-idling, called the “homogeneously non idling” constraint, where for any subset of machines, the union of their busy intervals must make an interval and we present the structural property that leads to a polynomial algorithm for unit time jobs and a weak precedence. We conclude by giving some research directions that seem quite interesting to study both for theoretical and practical issues.

Suggested Citation

  • Philippe Chrétienne, 2016. "On scheduling with the non-idling constraint," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 240(1), pages 301-319, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:240:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-015-2011-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-015-2011-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-015-2011-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-015-2011-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. T. C. Hu, 1961. "Parallel Sequencing and Assembly Line Problems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 9(6), pages 841-848, December.
    2. J. K. Lenstra & A. H. G. Rinnooy Kan, 1978. "Complexity of Scheduling under Precedence Constraints," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 26(1), pages 22-35, February.
    3. K. R. Baker & E. L. Lawler & J. K. Lenstra & A. H. G. Rinnooy Kan, 1983. "Preemptive Scheduling of a Single Machine to Minimize Maximum Cost Subject to Release Dates and Precedence Constraints," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(2), pages 381-386, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiang, Xiaojuan & Lee, Kangbok & Pinedo, Michael L., 2021. "Ideal schedules in parallel machine settings," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(2), pages 422-434.
    2. Lenstra, J. K. & Rinnooy Kan, A. H. G., 1980. "An Introduction To Multiprocessor Scheduling," Econometric Institute Archives 272258, Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    3. Tzafestas, Spyros & Triantafyllakis, Alekos, 1993. "Deterministic scheduling in computing and manufacturing systems: a survey of models and algorithms," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 397-434.
    4. Markó Horváth & Tamás Kis, 2020. "Polyhedral results for position-based scheduling of chains on a single machine," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 284(1), pages 283-322, January.
    5. Nodari Vakhania, 2001. "Tight Performance Bounds of CP-Scheduling on Out-Trees," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 5(4), pages 445-464, December.
    6. D. Prot & O. Bellenguez-Morineau, 2018. "A survey on how the structure of precedence constraints may change the complexity class of scheduling problems," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 3-16, February.
    7. Felix Happach, 2021. "Makespan minimization with OR-precedence constraints," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 319-328, June.
    8. Jia, Beizhen & Tierney, Kevin & Reinhardt, Line Blander & Pahl, Julia, 2022. "Optimal dual cycling operations in roll-on roll-off terminals," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    9. Anurag Agarwal & Varghese S. Jacob & Hasan Pirkul, 2006. "An Improved Augmented Neural-Network Approach for Scheduling Problems," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 18(1), pages 119-128, February.
    10. Ramachandra, Girish & Elmaghraby, Salah E., 2006. "Sequencing precedence-related jobs on two machines to minimize the weighted completion time," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(1), pages 44-58, March.
    11. Ravindran Vijayalakshmi, Vipin & Schröder, Marc & Tamir, Tami, 2024. "Minimizing total completion time with machine-dependent priority lists," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(3), pages 844-854.
    12. Alexander Grigoriev & Martijn Holthuijsen & Joris van de Klundert, 2005. "Basic scheduling problems with raw material constraints," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 52(6), pages 527-535, September.
    13. Yan Zhao & Liping Chen & Gang Xie & Jianjun Zhao & Jianwan Ding, 2018. "GPU implementation of a cellular genetic algorithm for scheduling dependent tasks of physical system simulation programs," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 293-317, January.
    14. Katarina Cechlarova & Bettina Klaus & David F.Manlove, 2018. "Pareto optimal matchings of students to courses in the presence of prerequisites," Cahiers de Recherches Economiques du Département d'économie 16.04, Université de Lausanne, Faculté des HEC, Département d’économie.
    15. Tianyu Wang & Odile Bellenguez, 2021. "Three notes on scheduling unit-length jobs with precedence constraints to minimize the total completion time," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 649-662, December.
    16. Francis Sourd & Wim Nuijten, 2000. "Multiple-Machine Lower Bounds for Shop-Scheduling Problems," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 12(4), pages 341-352, November.
    17. Janiak, Adam & Kovalyov, Mikhail Y., 2006. "Scheduling in a contaminated area: A model and polynomial algorithms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 173(1), pages 125-132, August.
    18. Ahadi, Khatereh & Sullivan, Kelly M. & Mitchell, Kenneth Ned, 2018. "Budgeting maintenance dredging projects under uncertainty to improve the inland waterway network performance," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 63-87.
    19. Blazewicz, Jacek & Liu, Zhen, 2002. "Linear and quadratic algorithms for scheduling chains and opposite chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(2), pages 248-264, March.
    20. Rodriguez Diaz, Antonio & Tchernykh, Andrei & Ecker, Klaus H., 2003. "Algorithms for dynamic scheduling of unit execution time tasks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 146(2), pages 403-416, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:240:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-015-2011-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.