IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/aistmt/v69y2017i3d10.1007_s10463-016-0556-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Two-step estimation procedures for inhomogeneous shot-noise Cox processes

Author

Listed:
  • Michaela Prokešová

    (Charles University in Prague)

  • Jiří Dvořák

    (Charles University in Prague)

  • Eva B. Vedel Jensen

    (Aarhus University)

Abstract

In the present paper, we discuss and compare several two-step estimation procedures for inhomogeneous shot-noise Cox processes. The intensity function is parametrized by the inhomogeneity parameters while the pair-correlation function is parametrized by the interaction parameters. The suggested procedures are based on a combination of Poisson likelihood estimation of the inhomogeneity parameters in the first step and an adaptation of a method from the homogeneous case for estimation of the interaction parameters in the second step. The adapted methods, based on minimum contrast estimation, composite likelihood and Palm likelihood, are compared both theoretically and by means of a simulation study. The general conclusion from the simulation study is that the three estimation methods have similar performance. Two-step estimation with Palm likelihood has not been considered before and is motivated by the superior performance of the Palm likelihood in the stationary case for estimation of certain parameters of interest. Asymptotic normality of the two-step estimator with Palm likelihood is proved.

Suggested Citation

  • Michaela Prokešová & Jiří Dvořák & Eva B. Vedel Jensen, 2017. "Two-step estimation procedures for inhomogeneous shot-noise Cox processes," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 69(3), pages 513-542, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:aistmt:v:69:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s10463-016-0556-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s10463-016-0556-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10463-016-0556-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10463-016-0556-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michaela Prokešová & Eva Jensen, 2013. "Asymptotic Palm likelihood theory for stationary point processes," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 65(2), pages 387-412, April.
    2. A. J. Baddeley & J. Møller & R. Waagepetersen, 2000. "Non‐ and semi‐parametric estimation of interaction in inhomogeneous point patterns," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 54(3), pages 329-350, November.
    3. Rasmus Plenge Waagepetersen, 2007. "An Estimating Function Approach to Inference for Inhomogeneous Neyman–Scott Processes," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 63(1), pages 252-258, March.
    4. Guan, Yongtao, 2006. "A Composite Likelihood Approach in Fitting Spatial Point Process Models," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 101, pages 1502-1512, December.
    5. Jesper Møller & Rasmus P. Waagepetersen, 2007. "Modern Statistics for Spatial Point Processes," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 34(4), pages 643-684, December.
    6. Yongtao Guan & Michael Sherman, 2007. "On least squares fitting for stationary spatial point processes," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 69(1), pages 31-49, February.
    7. Rasmus Waagepetersen & Yongtao Guan, 2009. "Two‐step estimation for inhomogeneous spatial point processes," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 71(3), pages 685-702, June.
    8. Baddeley, Adrian & Turner, Rolf, 2005. "spatstat: An R Package for Analyzing Spatial Point Patterns," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 12(i06).
    9. Abdollah Jalilian & Yongtao Guan & Rasmus Waagepetersen, 2013. "Decomposition of Variance for Spatial Cox Processes," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 40(1), pages 119-137, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nicoletta D’Angelo & Marianna Siino & Antonino D’Alessandro & Giada Adelfio, 2022. "Local spatial log-Gaussian Cox processes for seismic data," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 106(4), pages 633-671, December.
    2. Tilman M. Davies & Martin L. Hazelton, 2013. "Assessing minimum contrast parameter estimation for spatial and spatiotemporal log‐Gaussian Cox processes," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 67(4), pages 355-389, November.
    3. Jesper Møller & Heidi S. Christensen & Francisco Cuevas-Pacheco & Andreas D. Christoffersen, 2021. "Structured Space-Sphere Point Processes and K-Functions," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 569-591, June.
    4. Frédéric Lavancier & Arnaud Poinas & Rasmus Waagepetersen, 2021. "Adaptive estimating function inference for nonstationary determinantal point processes," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 48(1), pages 87-107, March.
    5. Jesper Møller & Carlos Díaz‐Avalos, 2010. "Structured Spatio‐Temporal Shot‐Noise Cox Point Process Models, with a View to Modelling Forest Fires," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 37(1), pages 2-25, March.
    6. Yu Ryan Yue & Ji Meng Loh, 2011. "Bayesian Semiparametric Intensity Estimation for Inhomogeneous Spatial Point Processes," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(3), pages 937-946, September.
    7. T. Mrkvička, 2014. "Distinguishing Different Types of Inhomogeneity in Neyman–Scott Point Processes," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 385-395, June.
    8. Ute Hahn & Eva B. Vedel Jensen, 2016. "Hidden Second-order Stationary Spatial Point Processes," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 43(2), pages 455-475, June.
    9. Michaela Prokešová & Eva Jensen, 2013. "Asymptotic Palm likelihood theory for stationary point processes," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 65(2), pages 387-412, April.
    10. D'Angelo, Nicoletta & Adelfio, Giada & Mateu, Jorge, 2023. "Locally weighted minimum contrast estimation for spatio-temporal log-Gaussian Cox processes," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    11. Ushio Tanaka & Yosihiko Ogata, 2014. "Identification and estimation of superposed Neyman–Scott spatial cluster processes," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 66(4), pages 687-702, August.
    12. Christophe Ange Napoléon Biscio & Frédéric Lavancier, 2017. "Contrast Estimation for Parametric Stationary Determinantal Point Processes," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 44(1), pages 204-229, March.
    13. Jean-François Coeurjolly & Jesper Møller & Rasmus Waagepetersen, 2017. "A Tutorial on Palm Distributions for Spatial Point Processes," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 85(3), pages 404-420, December.
    14. Jean-François Coeurjolly, 2017. "Median-based estimation of the intensity of a spatial point process," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 69(2), pages 303-331, April.
    15. Chong Deng & Yongtao Guan & Rasmus P. Waagepetersen & Jingfei Zhang, 2017. "Second‐order quasi‐likelihood for spatial point processes," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 73(4), pages 1311-1320, December.
    16. Nicoletta D’Angelo & Giada Adelfio, 2024. "Minimum contrast for the first-order intensity estimation of spatial and spatio-temporal point processes," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 65(6), pages 3651-3679, August.
    17. Jalilian, Abdollah, 2016. "On the higher order product density functions of a Neyman–Scott cluster point process," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 144-150.
    18. Jiří Dvořák & Michaela Prokešová, 2016. "Parameter Estimation for Inhomogeneous Space-Time Shot-Noise Cox Point Processes," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 43(4), pages 939-961, December.
    19. Deng, C. & Waagepetersen, R.P. & Wang, M. & Guan, Y., 2018. "A fast spectral quasi-likelihood approach for spatial point processes," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 59-64.
    20. Qing-Song Yang & Guo-Chun Shen & He-Ming Liu & Zhang-Hua Wang & Zun-Ping Ma & Xiao-Feng Fang & Jian Zhang & Xi-Hua Wang, 2016. "Detangling the Effects of Environmental Filtering and Dispersal Limitation on Aggregated Distributions of Tree and Shrub Species: Life Stage Matters," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(5), pages 1-16, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:aistmt:v:69:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s10463-016-0556-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.