IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sot/journl/y2012i51p2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A new microsimulation model for the evaluation of traffic safety performances

Author

Listed:
  • Astarita, Vittorio
  • Guido, Giuseppe
  • Vitale, Alessandro
  • Giofré, Vincenzo

Abstract

Some papers have been recently presented (Cunto and Saccomanno 2007, Cunto and Saccomanno 2008, Saccomanno et al. 2008) on the potential of traffic microsimulation for the analysis of road safety. In particular, studies have confirmed that the reproduction by simulation of user behaviour under different flow and geometry conditions, can identify a potential incident hazard and allow to take appropriate countermeasures at specific points of the road network. The objective of this paper is to assess the validity of this approach; for this reason a microsimulation model and an automatic video detection system have been developed. The microscopic model allows the estimation of road safety performance through a series of indicators (Deceleration Rate to Avoid Crash, Time to Collision, Proportion of Stopping Distance), representing interactions in real time, between different pairs of vehicles belonging to the traffic stream. When these indicators take a certain critical value, a possible accident scenario is identified. The microscopic simulation model is used combined with a new video image traffic detection algorithm to calculate vehicle trajectories. Microscopic traffic flow parameters obtained by video detection are used to calibrate the microsimulation model, and the safety performance indicators obtained by the real vehicles trajectories can be compared with simulated scenarios where safety performance indicators are obtained on the simulated trajectories. Results indicate that the methodology can be useful in the estimation of safety performance indicators and in evaluating traffic control measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Astarita, Vittorio & Guido, Giuseppe & Vitale, Alessandro & Giofré, Vincenzo, 2012. "A new microsimulation model for the evaluation of traffic safety performances," European Transport \ Trasporti Europei, ISTIEE, Institute for the Study of Transport within the European Economic Integration, issue 51, pages 1-2.
  • Handle: RePEc:sot:journl:y:2012:i:51:p:2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10077/6117
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gipps, P.G., 1981. "A behavioural car-following model for computer simulation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 105-111, April.
    2. Robert E. Chandler & Robert Herman & Elliott W. Montroll, 1958. "Traffic Dynamics: Studies in Car Following," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 6(2), pages 165-184, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vittorio Astarita & Ciro Caliendo & Vincenzo Pasquale Giofrè & Isidoro Russo, 2020. "Surrogate Safety Measures from Traffic Simulation: Validation of Safety Indicators with Intersection Traffic Crash Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-21, August.
    2. Zhao, Peibo & Lee, Chris, 2016. "Evaluation of Rear-End Collision Risk in Car-Heavy Vehicle Mixed Traffic Flow on Freeways Using Surrogate Safety Measures," 57th Transportation Research Forum (51st CTRF) Joint Conference, Toronto, Ontario, May 1-4, 2016 319279, Transportation Research Forum.
    3. Li Li & Dong Zhang, 2018. "Merging Vehicles and Lane Speed-Flow Relationship in a Work Zone," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-13, June.
    4. Vittorio Astarita & Vincenzo Pasquale Giofrè & Giuseppe Guido & Alessandro Vitale, 2019. "A Single Intersection Cooperative-Competitive Paradigm in Real Time Traffic Signal Settings Based on Floating Car Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-22, January.
    5. Salvatore Leonardi & Natalia Distefano, 2023. "Turbo-Roundabouts as an Instrument for Improving the Efficiency and Safety in Urban Area: An Italian Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Xiaopeng & Wang, Xin & Ouyang, Yanfeng, 2012. "Prediction and field validation of traffic oscillation propagation under nonlinear car-following laws," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 409-423.
    2. Yao, Handong & Li, Qianwen & Li, Xiaopeng, 2020. "A study of relationships in traffic oscillation features based on field experiments," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 339-355.
    3. He, Zhengbing & Zheng, Liang & Guan, Wei, 2015. "A simple nonparametric car-following model driven by field data," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 185-201.
    4. Andrea Papu Carrone & Jeppe Rich & Christian Anker Vandet & Kun An, 2021. "Autonomous vehicles in mixed motorway traffic: capacity utilisation, impact and policy implications," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(6), pages 2907-2938, December.
    5. Koutsopoulos, Haris N. & Farah, Haneen, 2012. "Latent class model for car following behavior," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(5), pages 563-578.
    6. Tordeux, Antoine & Lassarre, Sylvain & Roussignol, Michel, 2010. "An adaptive time gap car-following model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 44(8-9), pages 1115-1131, September.
    7. Blanch Micó, Mª Teresa & Lucas Alba, Antonio & Bellés Rivera, Teresa & Ferruz Gracia, Ana Mª & Melchor Galán, Óscar M. & Delgado Pastor, Luis C. & Ruíz Jiménez, Francisco & Chóliz Montañés, Mariano, 2018. "Car following: Comparing distance-oriented vs. inertia-oriented driving techniques," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 13-22.
    8. Tian, Junfang & Li, Guangyu & Treiber, Martin & Jiang, Rui & Jia, Ning & Ma, Shoufeng, 2016. "Cellular automaton model simulating spatiotemporal patterns, phase transitions and concave growth pattern of oscillations in traffic flow," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 93(PA), pages 560-575.
    9. Jiang, Rui & Hu, Mao-Bin & Zhang, H.M. & Gao, Zi-You & Jia, Bin & Wu, Qing-Song, 2015. "On some experimental features of car-following behavior and how to model them," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 338-354.
    10. Maiti, Nandan & Chilukuri, Bhargava Rama, 2023. "Does anisotropy hold in mixed traffic conditions?," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 632(P1).
    11. Ponnu, Balaji & Coifman, Benjamin, 2015. "Speed-spacing dependency on relative speed from the adjacent lane: New insights for car following models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 74-90.
    12. Wang, Pengcheng & Yu, Guizhen & Wu, Xinkai & Qin, Hongmao & Wang, Yunpeng, 2018. "An extended car-following model to describe connected traffic dynamics under cyberattacks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 496(C), pages 351-370.
    13. Zheng, Liang & Jin, Peter J. & Huang, Helai, 2015. "An anisotropic continuum model considering bi-directional information impact," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 36-57.
    14. Zheng, Zuduo, 2014. "Recent developments and research needs in modeling lane changing," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 16-32.
    15. Li, Xiaopeng & Cui, Jianxun & An, Shi & Parsafard, Mohsen, 2014. "Stop-and-go traffic analysis: Theoretical properties, environmental impacts and oscillation mitigation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 319-339.
    16. Chiabaut, Nicolas & Leclercq, Ludovic & Buisson, Christine, 2010. "From heterogeneous drivers to macroscopic patterns in congestion," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 299-308, February.
    17. Li, Xiaopeng & Peng, Fan & Ouyang, Yanfeng, 2010. "Measurement and estimation of traffic oscillation properties," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 1-14, January.
    18. Tian, Junfang & Zhang, H.M. & Treiber, Martin & Jiang, Rui & Gao, Zi-You & Jia, Bin, 2019. "On the role of speed adaptation and spacing indifference in traffic instability: Evidence from car-following experiments and its stochastic model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 334-350.
    19. Zhou, Fang & Li, Xiaopeng & Ma, Jiaqi, 2017. "Parsimonious shooting heuristic for trajectory design of connected automated traffic part I: Theoretical analysis with generalized time geography," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 394-420.
    20. Tan, Jin-hua, 2019. "Impact of risk illusions on traffic flow in fog weather," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 525(C), pages 216-222.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sot:journl:y:2012:i:51:p:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Romeo Danielis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/xxxxxxx.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.