IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/trapol/v67y2018icp13-22.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Car following: Comparing distance-oriented vs. inertia-oriented driving techniques

Author

Listed:
  • Blanch Micó, Mª Teresa
  • Lucas Alba, Antonio
  • Bellés Rivera, Teresa
  • Ferruz Gracia, Ana Mª
  • Melchor Galán, Óscar M.
  • Delgado Pastor, Luis C.
  • Ruíz Jiménez, Francisco
  • Chóliz Montañés, Mariano

Abstract

The rationale behind most car-following (CF) models is the possibility to appraise and formalize how drivers naturally follow each other. Characterizing and parametrizing Normative Driving Behavior (NDB) became major goals, especially during the last 25 years. Most CF models assumed driver propensity for constant, safe distance is axiomatic. This paper challenges the idea of safety distance as the main parameter defining a unique (or natural) NDB. Instead, it states drivers can adapt to reactive and proactive car following. Drawing on recent CF models close to the Nagoya paradigm and on other phenomena (e.g., wave movement in Nature), we conceived car following by Driving to keep Inertia (DI) as an alternative to Driving to keep Distance (DD). On a driving simulator, three studies (N = 113) based on a repeated-measures experimental design explored the efficiency of these elementary techniques by measuring individual driver performance (e.g., accelerations, decelerations, average speed, distance to leader). Drivers easily grasped and applied either technique and easily switched back and forth between the two. As an overall indicator, all the studies revealed DI trips use about 20% less fuel than DD trips do.

Suggested Citation

  • Blanch Micó, Mª Teresa & Lucas Alba, Antonio & Bellés Rivera, Teresa & Ferruz Gracia, Ana Mª & Melchor Galán, Óscar M. & Delgado Pastor, Luis C. & Ruíz Jiménez, Francisco & Chóliz Montañés, Mariano, 2018. "Car following: Comparing distance-oriented vs. inertia-oriented driving techniques," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 13-22.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:67:y:2018:i:c:p:13-22
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.05.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X16304747
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.05.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Denos C. Gazis & Robert Herman, 1992. "The Moving and “Phantom” Bottlenecks," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(3), pages 223-229, August.
    2. Gipps, P.G., 1981. "A behavioural car-following model for computer simulation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 105-111, April.
    3. Rajagopal, 2014. "The Human Factors," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Architecting Enterprise, chapter 9, pages 225-249, Palgrave Macmillan.
    4. Robert E. Chandler & Robert Herman & Elliott W. Montroll, 1958. "Traffic Dynamics: Studies in Car Following," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 6(2), pages 165-184, April.
    5. Zheng, Zuduo, 2014. "Recent developments and research needs in modeling lane changing," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 16-32.
    6. Luigi Pariota & Gennaro Nicola Bifulco & Mark Brackstone, 2016. "A Linear Dynamic Model for Driving Behavior in Car Following," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(3), pages 1032-1042, August.
    7. P. Wagner, 2011. "A time-discrete harmonic oscillator model of human car-following," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 84(4), pages 713-718, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tian, Junfang & Li, Guangyu & Treiber, Martin & Jiang, Rui & Jia, Ning & Ma, Shoufeng, 2016. "Cellular automaton model simulating spatiotemporal patterns, phase transitions and concave growth pattern of oscillations in traffic flow," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 93(PA), pages 560-575.
    2. Zhao, Jing & Knoop, Victor L. & Wang, Meng, 2020. "Two-dimensional vehicular movement modelling at intersections based on optimal control," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 1-22.
    3. He, Zhengbing & Zheng, Liang & Guan, Wei, 2015. "A simple nonparametric car-following model driven by field data," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 185-201.
    4. Saifuzzaman, Mohammad & Zheng, Zuduo & Haque, Md. Mazharul & Washington, Simon, 2017. "Understanding the mechanism of traffic hysteresis and traffic oscillations through the change in task difficulty level," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 523-538.
    5. Jiang, Rui & Hu, Mao-Bin & Zhang, H.M. & Gao, Zi-You & Jia, Bin & Wu, Qing-Song, 2015. "On some experimental features of car-following behavior and how to model them," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 338-354.
    6. Oh, Simon & Yeo, Hwasoo, 2015. "Impact of stop-and-go waves and lane changes on discharge rate in recovery flow," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 88-102.
    7. Sun, Jie & Zheng, Zuduo & Sun, Jian, 2018. "Stability analysis methods and their applicability to car-following models in conventional and connected environments," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 212-237.
    8. Saifuzzaman, Mohammad & Zheng, Zuduo & Mazharul Haque, Md. & Washington, Simon, 2015. "Revisiting the Task–Capability Interface model for incorporating human factors into car-following models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 1-19.
    9. Li, Xiaopeng & Wang, Xin & Ouyang, Yanfeng, 2012. "Prediction and field validation of traffic oscillation propagation under nonlinear car-following laws," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 409-423.
    10. Shuaiyang Jiao & Shengrui Zhang & Bei Zhou & Zixuan Zhang & Liyuan Xue, 2020. "An Extended Car-Following Model Considering the Drivers’ Characteristics under a V2V Communication Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-18, February.
    11. Chandle Chae & Youngho Kim, 2023. "Investigation of Following Vehicles’ Driving Patterns Using Spectral Analysis Techniques," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-15, July.
    12. Yao, Handong & Li, Qianwen & Li, Xiaopeng, 2020. "A study of relationships in traffic oscillation features based on field experiments," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 339-355.
    13. Wu, Xinyu & Xiao, Xinping, 2024. "An improved stochastic car-following model considering the complete state information of multiple preceding vehicles under connected vehicles environment," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 644(C).
    14. Wang, Baojie & Li, Wei & Wen, Haosong & Hu, Xiaojian, 2021. "Modeling impacts of driving automation system on mixed traffic flow at off-ramp freeway facilities," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 573(C).
    15. Andrea Papu Carrone & Jeppe Rich & Christian Anker Vandet & Kun An, 2021. "Autonomous vehicles in mixed motorway traffic: capacity utilisation, impact and policy implications," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(6), pages 2907-2938, December.
    16. Koutsopoulos, Haris N. & Farah, Haneen, 2012. "Latent class model for car following behavior," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(5), pages 563-578.
    17. Tordeux, Antoine & Lassarre, Sylvain & Roussignol, Michel, 2010. "An adaptive time gap car-following model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 44(8-9), pages 1115-1131, September.
    18. Jinhua Tan & Li Gong & Xuqian Qin, 2019. "Global Optimality under Internet of Vehicles: Strategy to Improve Traffic Safety and Reduce Energy Dissipation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-16, August.
    19. Maiti, Nandan & Chilukuri, Bhargava Rama, 2023. "Does anisotropy hold in mixed traffic conditions?," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 632(P1).
    20. Sharma, Anshuman & Zheng, Zuduo & Bhaskar, Ashish, 2019. "Is more always better? The impact of vehicular trajectory completeness on car-following model calibration and validation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 49-75.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:67:y:2018:i:c:p:13-22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.