IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sgh/gosnar/y2024i2p112-130.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Struktury organizacyjne centrów usług wspólnych – podejście oparte na ekonomii kosztów transakcyjnych

Author

Listed:
  • Szymon Maciej Lis

Abstract

Celem artykułu jest analiza kosztów transakcyjnych związanych z tworzeniem centrów usług wspólnych (ang. shared services centers – SSC) na przykładzie dwóch prywatnych firm oraz Centrum Obsługi Administracji Rządowej (COAR). W ramach podejścia opartego na ekonomii kosztów transakcyjnych sformułowano dwie hipotezy: 1) im więcej zasobów znajduje się w firmie, tym bardziej przedsiębiorstwa dążą do wykorzystywania tych zasobów poprzez utworzenie SSC, 2) im wyższa jest strategiczna wartość aktywów, tym bardziej działanie firmy jest uzasadnione przy zachowaniu, wykorzystaniu i skupieniu ich w ramach SSC. Przeprowadzona analiza jakościowa, obejmująca częściowo ustrukturyzowane wywiady oraz umowy z analizowanych podmiotów, potwierdziła obie hipotezy. W ramach SSC zidentyfikowano kluczowe problemy, takie jak zapewnienie wysokiej jakości usług i ich stałe ulepszanie, redukcja oportunizmu, mierzenie jakości usług, wycena skutków realizowanej umowy oraz ustanowienie efektywnej komunikacji w danej strukturze. Zastosowane rozwiązania były różnorodne, a badanie wykazało znaczący wpływ trzech czynników – procesów, mechanizmów relacyjnych i struktury organizacyjnej – które wspólnie oddziałują na kategorie kosztów transakcyjnych: zarządzanie, odnoszące się do adaptacyjnego procesu podejmowania decyzji, oraz pomiar, dotyczący oddziaływania informacji.

Suggested Citation

  • Szymon Maciej Lis, 2024. "Struktury organizacyjne centrów usług wspólnych – podejście oparte na ekonomii kosztów transakcyjnych," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 2, pages 112-130.
  • Handle: RePEc:sgh:gosnar:y:2024:i:2:p:112-130
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://gnpje.sgh.waw.pl/pdf-184317-111869
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Williamson, Oliver E, 1979. "Transaction-Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractural Relations," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 22(2), pages 233-261, October.
    2. Rozita Amiruddin & Aini Aman & Sofiah & Auzair & Noradiva Hamzah & Ruhanita Maelah, 2013. "Mitigating risks in a shared service relationship: the case of a Malaysian bank," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 10(1), pages 78-93, April.
    3. Yingyi Qian & Gerard Roland & Chenggang Xu, 2006. "Coordination and Experimentation in M-Form and U-Form Organizations," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 114(2), pages 366-402, April.
    4. Sara Rahmati & Mohammad Hossein Mahdavi & Saeid Jafarzadeh Ghoushchi & Hana Tomaskova & Gholamreza Haseli, 2022. "Assessment and Prioritize Risk Factors of Financial Measurement of Management Control System for Production Companies Using a Hybrid Z-SWARA and Z-WASPAS with FMEA Method: A Meta-Analysis," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-27, January.
    5. Janssen, Marijn & Joha, Anton, 2006. "Motives for establishing shared service centers in public administrations," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 102-115.
    6. Aric Rindfleisch, 2020. "Transaction cost theory: past, present and future," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(1), pages 85-97, June.
    7. Martin Eling & Hato Schmeiser & Joan T. Schmit, 2007. "The Solvency II Process: Overview and Critical Analysis," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 10(1), pages 69-85, March.
    8. Herbert, Ian P. & Seal, Will B., 2012. "Shared services as a new organisational form: Some implications for management accounting," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 83-97.
    9. Murray, Janet Y. & Kotabe, Masaaki, 2005. "Performance implications of strategic fit between alliance attributes and alliance forms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(11), pages 1525-1533, November.
    10. Reusen, Evelien & Stouthuysen, Kristof, 2020. "Trust transfer and partner selection in interfirm relationships," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    11. Paagman, Arnaud & Tate, Mary & Furtmueller, Elfi & de Bloom, Jessica, 2015. "An integrative literature review and empirical validation of motives for introducing shared services in government organizations," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 110-123.
    12. Siti Nuryanah & Sardar M. N. Islam, 2015. "Corporate Governance and Financial Management," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-1-137-43561-3.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Enthoven, Laura & Van den Broeck, Goedele, 2021. "Local food systems: Reviewing two decades of research," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    2. Shann Turnbull, 2017. "Grounding a Theory of Firms in the Natural Sciences," Humanistic Management Journal, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 159-186, April.
    3. Zuzanna Kowalik & Piotr Lewandowski & Tomasz Geodecki & Maciej Grodzicki, 2023. "Automation In Shared Service Centres: Implications For Skills And Autonomy In A Global Organisation," IBS Working Papers 08/2023, Instytut Badan Strukturalnych.
    4. Nagel, Duane M. & Giunipero, Larry & Jung, Hyeyoon & Salas, Jim & Hochstein, Bryan, 2021. "Purchaser perceptions of early phase supplier relationships: The role of similarity and likeability," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 174-186.
    5. Carlos Ferro-Soto & Carmen Padín & Carmen Otero-Neira & Göran Svensson, 2024. "Modeling Partners’ Behavior in Long-Lasting B2B Supply Chain Relationships," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-17, January.
    6. Ying Hao & Jing Lu, 2018. "The Impact of Government Intervention on Corporate Investment Allocations and Efficiency: Evidence from China," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 47(2), pages 383-419, June.
    7. Han, Shaojie & Su, Jingqin & Lyu, Yibo & Liu, Qing, 2022. "How do business incubators govern incubation relationships with different new ventures?," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    8. Mariani, Marcello M. & Fosso Wamba, Samuel, 2020. "Exploring how consumer goods companies innovate in the digital age: The role of big data analytics companies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 338-352.
    9. Pietro Cunha Dolci & Antonio Carlos Gastaud Maçada, 2014. "Information technology investments and supply chain governance," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 18(2), pages 217-235.
    10. Junyon Im & Sunny Sun, 2015. "Profits and outreach to the poor: The institutional logics of microfinance institutions," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 95-117, March.
    11. Jonathan H. Reed, 2022. "Operational and strategic change during temporary turbulence: evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 589-608, June.
    12. Ariño, Africa & Reuer, Jeffrey J., 2004. "Alliance contractual design," IESE Research Papers D/572, IESE Business School.
    13. Peter G. Klein & Michael E. Sykuta, 2010. "Editors’ Introduction," Chapters, in: Peter G. Klein & Michael E. Sykuta (ed.), The Elgar Companion to Transaction Cost Economics, chapter 1, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    14. Hoontaek Seo & Sangho Yi & William McCumber, 2024. "Friendly Boards and the Cost of Debt," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-17, July.
    15. Robert S. Gibbons & Manuel Grieder & Holger Herz & Christian Zehnder, 2019. "Building an Equilibrium: Rules Versus Principles in Relational Contracts," CESifo Working Paper Series 7871, CESifo.
    16. Stefano Ciliberti & Simone Del Sarto & Angelo Frascarelli & Giulia Pastorelli & Gaetano Martino, 2020. "Contracts to Govern the Transition towards Sustainable Production: Evidence from a Discrete Choice Analysis in the Durum Wheat Sector in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-14, November.
    17. Myint Moe Chit, 2018. "Political openness and the growth of small and medium enterprises: empirical evidence from transition economies," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 55(2), pages 781-804, September.
    18. Kimmich, Christian & Fischbacher, Urs, 2016. "Behavioral determinants of supply chain integration and coexistence," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 55-77.
    19. Buckley, Peter J. & Cross, Adam & De Mattos, Claudio, 2015. "The principle of congruity in the analysis of international business cooperation," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 24(6), pages 1048-1060.
    20. Nathan H. Miller, 2008. "Competition When Consumers Value Firm Scope," EAG Discussions Papers 200807, Department of Justice, Antitrust Division.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ekonomia kosztów transakcyjnych; centrum usług wspólnych; negocjacje; struktury organizacyjne; studium przypadku; organizacja pracy;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D22 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Firm Behavior: Empirical Analysis
    • D23 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Organizational Behavior; Transaction Costs; Property Rights
    • L20 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sgh:gosnar:y:2024:i:2:p:112-130. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Grzegorz Konat (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sgwawpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.