The Importance Of The Regions’ Economic Activity Evaluation In Russia, 2012-2016
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- Vladimir PLOTNIKOV & Gilan FEDOTOVA & Elena POPKOVA & Angelina KASTYURINA, 2015. "Harmonization of Strategic Planning Indicators of Territories’ Socioeconomic Growth," Regional and Sectoral Economic Studies, Euro-American Association of Economic Development, vol. 15(2), pages 105-114.
- Franco Ernesto Rubino & Maurizio Rija & Giovanni Bronzetti & Graziella Sicoli & Paolo Tenuta, 2016. "An innovative model for a sustainability report in no-profit organisations," International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 13(2/3), pages 119-134.
- Igor ANTONENKO, 2014. "Innovation Development Sectoral Trajectories Of The South Russian Regions," Regional and Sectoral Economic Studies, Euro-American Association of Economic Development, vol. 14(2).
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- Mara Cerquetti & Domenico Sardanelli & Concetta Ferrara, 2024. "Measuring museum sustainability within the framework of institutional theory: A dictionary‐based content analysis of French and British National Museums' annual reports," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(3), pages 2260-2276, May.
- Evgeny V. Frank & Oksana V. Mashevskaya & Lilia V. Ermolina, 2016. "Innovational Mechanism of Implementation of Cluster Initiatives in Business," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 179-188.
- Luigi Aldieri & Maxim Nikolaevich Kotsemir & Concetto Paolo Vinci, 2018. "Knowledge spillover effects: empirical evidence from Russian regions," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(5), pages 2111-2132, September.
More about this item
Keywords
innovations; innovation activity; rating analysis; innovation activity evaluation methods.;All these keywords.
JEL classification:
- R10 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - General
- O18 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Urban, Rural, Regional, and Transportation Analysis; Housing; Infrastructure
- O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sdo:regaec:v:26:y:2017:i:3_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marisa Chas-Amil (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feusces.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.