IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v8y1994i3p317-337.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Disciplinary Practice: A Study of Railways in Britain, 1860-1988

Author

Listed:
  • Paul K. Edwards

    (Industrial Relations Research Unit, University of Warwick)

  • Colin Whitston

    (Industrial Relations Research Unit, University of Warwick)

Abstract

Does disciplinary practice by employers evolve over time? Not only conventional analyses of discipline but also Foucauldian theories assume that it does. Three features may be tested: the rate of discipline (which should fall); the types of behaviour punished (which should reflect the maintenance of routine); and the dynamics of the process (which should indicate a rationalised approach and the absence of disciplinary purges). Yet there are very few studies of the process. One previous study of the US textile industry found a remarkable continuity between the early nineteenth and late twentieth centuries. The present analysis confirms this finding in the very different context of British railways: though types of behaviour subject to discipline were as expected, the rates of action in the late twentieth century were similar to those of the nineteenth, and the dynamics of the process in both periods contradicted an image of rationalisation. The paper also examines links between formal rules and workplace practice. Some findings, for example the particular ways in which rules and practice were connected, are specific to railways. Others, notably the unchanging dynamics of discipline, have a more general relevance and challenge evolutionary assumptions.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul K. Edwards & Colin Whitston, 1994. "Disciplinary Practice: A Study of Railways in Britain, 1860-1988," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 8(3), pages 317-337, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:8:y:1994:i:3:p:317-337
    DOI: 10.1177/095001709483001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/095001709483001
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/095001709483001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gersuny, Carl, 1976. "“A Devil in Petticoats” and Just Cause: Patterns of Punishment in Two New England Textile Factories," Business History Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 50(2), pages 131-152, July.
    2. Christine Edwards, 1987. "Formal Industrial Relations And Workplace Power: A Study On The Railway," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(1), pages 63-90, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrew Pendleton, 1991. "Integration and Dealignment in Public Enterprise Industrial Relations: A Study of British Rail," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 29(3), pages 411-426, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:8:y:1994:i:3:p:317-337. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.