IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v38y2024i5p1175-1196.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

‘It’s One Rule for Them and One for Us’: Occupational Classification, Gender and Worktime Domestic Labour

Author

Listed:
  • Julie Monroe

    (Newcastle University Business School, UK)

  • Steve Vincent

    (Newcastle University Business School, UK)

  • Ana Lopes

    (Newcastle University Business School, UK)

Abstract

In this article, we focus on gender and class to investigate worktime domestic labour. Methodologically, we extend a novel, comparative critical realist method in which occupation-based and gendered positions in productive and reproductive labour are foregrounded. By building theoretical connections between labour process conditions and collective rule-following practices, we illustrate how inequalities are inscribed organisationally. Our analysis provides a more critical contextualisation of technological affordances to develop the literature on how technology is implicated in the reproduction of social inequality. Moreover, our analysis identifies multi-level causal processes, which combine to explain the presence and actualisation of worktime domestic labour or its absence, which is due, principally, to fear of sanction. For realist researchers interested in diversity-based challenges, absences are important because they can point towards specific discriminatory mechanisms. Our investigation thus revealed a surprising level of class-related in-work inequality within the gendered dynamics of domestic work.

Suggested Citation

  • Julie Monroe & Steve Vincent & Ana Lopes, 2024. "‘It’s One Rule for Them and One for Us’: Occupational Classification, Gender and Worktime Domestic Labour," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 38(5), pages 1175-1196, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:38:y:2024:i:5:p:1175-1196
    DOI: 10.1177/09500170241235864
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09500170241235864
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09500170241235864?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:38:y:2024:i:5:p:1175-1196. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.