IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/vision/v6y2002i1p41-44.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Corporate Governance: An Alternate Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Jinesh N. Panchali
  • Rachana Baid

Abstract

The modern public corporation command huge societal resources at their disposal. They need to be accountable for its use to society. Apparently, since shareholders provide the risk capital (and hence own the company), it should be accountable to them. However, can a company legitimize its existence by confining its accountability towards specific section of stakeholders? Can a company abuse its market position by indulging in undesirable trade practices to avoid competition for serving the interests of shareholders? Thus, a matter of debate is, in whose interests the company should be governed and in what manner a balance may be maintained among the interests of the various stakeholders? Shareholders' wealth maximisation argument is based on a number of restrictive assumptions may not be valid, at least, in emerging economies like India. Also, there have been evidences where companies have done well despite maximising interests of stakeholders (other than shareholders) wealth. For lasting success of the business, its top priority need not be its shareholders. In fact, precedence of shareholders' interests over other stakeholders may adversely affect the long term survival and success of the business. It requires optimisation of interests of various stakeholders over lop-sided maximisation of one class of stakeholders.

Suggested Citation

  • Jinesh N. Panchali & Rachana Baid, 2002. "Corporate Governance: An Alternate Approach," Vision, , vol. 6(1), pages 41-44, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:vision:v:6:y:2002:i:1:p:41-44
    DOI: 10.1177/097226290200600105
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/097226290200600105
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/097226290200600105?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Keasey, Kevin & Thompson, Steve & Wright, Mike (ed.), 1997. "Corporate Governance: Economic and Financial Issues," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198289913.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sourafel Girma & Steve Thompson & Peter Wright, 2002. "Multinational activity and CEO compensation: Preliminary evidence from large UK firms," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 138(4), pages 680-693, December.
    2. Marco Zanobio, 2012. "Aspetti teorici della Corporate Governance," DISEIS - Quaderni del Dipartimento di Economia internazionale, delle istituzioni e dello sviluppo dis1202, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Dipartimento di Economia internazionale, delle istituzioni e dello sviluppo (DISEIS).
    3. Maria-Teresa Marchica, "undated". "Debt Maturity and the Characteristics of Ownership Structure: An Empirical Investigation of UK Firms," Discussion Papers 05/29, Department of Economics, University of York.
    4. Kanellos Toudas & Athanasios Bellas, 2014. "Corporate Governance and its Effect on Firm Value and Stock Returns of Listed Companies on the Athens Stock Exchange," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 58-80.
    5. Michelle Haynes & Steve Thompson & Mike Wright, 2007. "Executive Remuneration and Corporate Divestment: Motivating Managers to Make Unpalatable Decisions," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(5‐6), pages 792-818, June.
    6. Paul Hamalainen & Maximilian Hall & Barry Howcroft, 2005. "THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN RETRACTED A Framework for Market Discipline in Bank Regulatory Design," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1‐2), pages 183-209, January.
    7. Jiří Hlaváček & Michal Hlaváček, 2008. "Corporate social responsibility (CSR): Proklamace nebo ekonomická nutnost? [Corporate social responsibility (CSR): Only a proclamation or economic necessity?]," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2008(5), pages 579-597.
    8. Short, Helen & Keasey, Kevin, 1999. "Managerial ownership and the performance of firms: Evidence from the UK," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 79-101, March.
    9. Laura VASILESCU, 2014. "Corporate Governance in the Central and Eastern Europe Countries - Features and Developments," Finante - provocarile viitorului (Finance - Challenges of the Future), University of Craiova, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 1(16), pages 114-118, December.
    10. Steve Thompson, 1999. "Increasingly Marginal Utilities: Diversification and Free Cash Flow in Newly Privatized UK Utilities," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 15(1), pages 25-42, August.
    11. Iqbal, Zamir & Mirakhor, Abbas, 2004. "Stakeholders Model Of Governance In Islamic Economic System," Islamic Economic Studies, The Islamic Research and Training Institute (IRTI), vol. 11, pages 44-63.
    12. Firas Farhan Jedi & Sabri Nayan, 2018. "An empirical evidence on the effect of women board representation on firm performance of companies listed in Iraq Stock Exchange," Business and Economic Horizons (BEH), Prague Development Center, vol. 14(1), pages 117-131, January.
    13. Imanol Basterretxea & Chris Cornforth & Iñaki Heras-Saizarbitoria, 2022. "Corporate governance as a key aspect in the failure of worker cooperatives," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 43(1), pages 362-387, February.
    14. Christopher Cowton, 2011. "Putting Creditors in Their Rightful Place: Corporate Governance and Business Ethics in the Light of Limited Liability," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 102(1), pages 21-32, March.
    15. Darren Henry, 2008. "Corporate Governance Structure and the Valuation of Australian Firms: Is There Value in Ticking the Boxes?," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(7‐8), pages 912-942, September.
    16. ATM Adnan & Hilda Tandigalla, 2017. "The Dramatic Shift In Emphasis From A Shareholder-Dominated Approach To A Stakeholder-Oriented Corporate Governance Model," European Journal of Business and Economics, Central Bohemia University, vol. 12(2), pages 11151:12-11, January.
    17. Arturo Bris & Christos Cabolis, 2008. "The Value of Investor Protection: Firm Evidence from Cross-Border Mergers," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 21(2), pages 605-648, April.
    18. Richard Harris & Catherine Robinson, 2003. "Foreign Ownership and Productivity in the United Kingdom Estimates for U.K. Manufacturing Using the ARD," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 22(3), pages 207-223, May.
    19. Shaoul, Jean & Stafford, Anne & Stapleton, Pamela, 2012. "Accountability and corporate governance of public private partnerships," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 213-229.
    20. Elena Merino & Montserrat Manzaneque & Yolanda Ramírez, 2019. "Value-added distribution to stakeholder of Spanish listed companies: a corporate governance perspective," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 23(3), pages 577-604, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:vision:v:6:y:2002:i:1:p:41-44. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.