IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/vision/v28y2024i2p157-170.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Industry 4.0 in Textile and Apparel Industry: A Systematic Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis of Global Research Trends

Author

Listed:
  • B. Deepthi
  • Vikram Bansal

Abstract

The manufacturing industry is poised to undergo a paradigm shift with the advent of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, popularly known as ‘Industry 4.0’, which will integrate the physical and digital worlds. As a widely acknowledged phrase among research institutions and universities, the ‘Industry 4.0’ paradigm has attracted significant interest from the academic, business and scientific communities. Even though the concept is not new and has been at the forefront of scholarly research for many years with many interpretations, the ‘Industry 4.0’ concept has just recently been introduced. It is widely accepted not only in the research field but also in the manufacturing ecosystems. However, there is a need to comprehend industry-specific research advancements, trends and gaps due to the diverse applications of different technologies. This article systematically reviews and comprehensively evaluates the research on different Industry 4.0 efforts and their applicability in the textile and manufacturing industries. This article aims to map the current Industry 4.0 literature in the textile and apparel industry to analyse and categorize existing research and identify research gaps. We utilized the PRISMA framework to conduct a systematic review of the literature and 34 research publications on Industry 4.0 in the textile and apparel industry were located using a well-organized keyword search of the Web of Science and Scopus databases. The findings indicate that, of all Industry 4.0 technologies, the internet of things (IoT) and RFID applications are the most extensively investigated in the textile and manufacturing industries. Despite the extensive applications of additive manufacturing (AM)/3D printing and augmented reality (AR), research in both fields is still in its infancy. The study revealed that Germany is the country that has published the most literature on Industry 4.0 projects in the textile and apparel industries. We urge that future academics focus on determining the relevance of Industry 4.0 initiatives to small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) as the textile and apparel industry is dominated by SMEs in many developing countries.

Suggested Citation

  • B. Deepthi & Vikram Bansal, 2024. "Industry 4.0 in Textile and Apparel Industry: A Systematic Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis of Global Research Trends," Vision, , vol. 28(2), pages 157-170, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:vision:v:28:y:2024:i:2:p:157-170
    DOI: 10.1177/09722629221130233
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09722629221130233
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09722629221130233?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wen-Hsien Tsai, 2018. "Green Production Planning and Control for the Textile Industry by Using Mathematical Programming and Industry 4.0 Techniques," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-24, August.
    2. Norris, Michael & Oppenheim, Charles, 2007. "Comparing alternatives to the Web of Science for coverage of the social sciences’ literature," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 1(2), pages 161-169.
    3. Heather Keathley-Herring & Eileen Van Aken & Fernando Gonzalez-Aleu & Fernando Deschamps & Geert Letens & Pablo Cardenas Orlandini, 2016. "Assessing the maturity of a research area: bibliometric review and proposed framework," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 109(2), pages 927-951, November.
    4. Neeraj Singhal, 2021. "An Empirical Investigation of Industry 4.0 Preparedness in India," Vision, , vol. 25(3), pages 300-311, September.
    5. David Moher & Alessandro Liberati & Jennifer Tetzlaff & Douglas G Altman & The PRISMA Group, 2009. "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(7), pages 1-6, July.
    6. Ercan Oztemel & Samet Gursev, 2020. "Literature review of Industry 4.0 and related technologies," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 127-182, January.
    7. Shu, Fei & Julien, Charles-Antoine & Zhang, Lin & Qiu, Junping & Zhang, Jing & Larivière, Vincent, 2019. "Comparing journal and paper level classifications of science," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 202-225.
    8. Philipp Korom, 2019. "A bibliometric visualization of the economics and sociology of wealth inequality: a world apart?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 118(3), pages 849-868, March.
    9. Chun-Liang Chen, 2019. "Value Creation by SMEs Participating in Global Value Chains under Industry 4.0 Trend: Case Study of Textile Industry in Taiwan," Journal of Global Information Technology Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(2), pages 120-145, April.
    10. Benedikt Simmert & Philipp Alexander Ebel & Christoph Peters & Eva Alice Christiane Bittner & Jan Marco Leimeister, 2019. "Conquering the Challenge of Continuous Business Model Improvement," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 61(4), pages 451-468, August.
    11. Andrzej Lis & Agata Sudolska & Mateusz Tomanek, 2020. "Mapping Research on Sustainable Supply-Chain Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-26, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Muhammad Imran Qureshi & Nohman Khan & Shazia Qayyum & Subha Malik & Sanil S Hishan & Thurasamy Ramayah, 2020. "Classifications of Sustainable Manufacturing Practices in ASEAN Region: A Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis of the Past Decade of Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-19, October.
    2. Nirojan JASINTHA, 2023. "What Is Known And Unknown: A Bibliometric Analysis Of Organizational Politics," Management Research and Practice, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 15(2), pages 5-16, June.
    3. Zhaoyuan He & Paul Turner, 2021. "A Systematic Review on Technologies and Industry 4.0 in the Forest Supply Chain: A Framework Identifying Challenges and Opportunities," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-22, December.
    4. Miriam Edith Pérez-Romero & José Álvarez-García & Martha Beatriz Flores-Romero & Donaji Jiménez-Islas, 2023. "UNESCO Global Geoparks 22 Years after Their Creation: Analysis of Scientific Production," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-18, March.
    5. Maria Vincenza Ciasullo & Raffaella Montera & Emilia Romeo, 2023. "What about Data-Driven Business Models? Mapping the Literature and Scoping Future Avenues," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 16(8), pages 1-1, February.
    6. Saïd Echchakoui, 0. "Why and how to merge Scopus and Web of Science during bibliometric analysis: the case of sales force literature from 1912 to 2019," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 0, pages 1-20.
    7. Özlem O. Akdeniz & Hussein A. Abdou & Ali I. Hayek & Jacinta C. Nwachukwu & Ahmed A. Elamer & Chris Pyke, 2024. "Technical efficiency in banks: a review of methods, recent innovations and future research agenda," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 18(11), pages 3395-3456, November.
    8. Vasja Roblek & Maja Meško & Mirjana Pejić Bach & Oshane Thorpe & Polona Šprajc, 2020. "The Interaction between Internet, Sustainable Development, and Emergence of Society 5.0," Data, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-27, September.
    9. Tan Ching Ng & Sie Yee Lau & Morteza Ghobakhloo & Masood Fathi & Meng Suan Liang, 2022. "The Application of Industry 4.0 Technological Constituents for Sustainable Manufacturing: A Content-Centric Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-21, April.
    10. La Torre, Mario & Leo, Sabrina & Palma, Alessia & Zapata, Jenny Daniela Salazar, 2024. "Public spending and green finance: A systematic literature review," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    11. Nadeem Akhtar & Nohman Khan & Muhammad Mahroof Khan & Shagufta Ashraf & Muhammad Saim Hashmi & Muhammad Muddassar Khan & Sanil S. Hishan, 2021. "Post-COVID 19 Tourism: Will Digital Tourism Replace Mass Tourism?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-18, May.
    12. Saïd Echchakoui, 2020. "Why and how to merge Scopus and Web of Science during bibliometric analysis: the case of sales force literature from 1912 to 2019," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(3), pages 165-184, September.
    13. Luis Fonseca & António Amaral & José Oliveira, 2021. "Quality 4.0: The EFQM 2020 Model and Industry 4.0 Relationships and Implications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-20, March.
    14. Lulu Xin & Shuai Lang & Arunodaya Raj Mishra, 2022. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Evaluate the challenges of sustainable supply chain 4.0 implementation under the circular economy concept using new decision making approach," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 773-792, December.
    15. İlkay Unay-Gailhard & Mark A. Brennen, 2022. "How digital communications contribute to shaping the career paths of youth: a review study focused on farming as a career option," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(4), pages 1491-1508, December.
    16. Mahin Ghafari & Vali Baigi & Zahra Cheraghi & Amin Doosti-Irani, 2016. "The Prevalence of Asymptomatic Bacteriuria in Iranian Pregnant Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-10, June.
    17. Santos Urbina & Sofía Villatoro & Jesús Salinas, 2021. "Self-Regulated Learning and Technology-Enhanced Learning Environments in Higher Education: A Scoping Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-12, June.
    18. Nadine Desrochers & Adèle Paul‐Hus & Jen Pecoskie, 2017. "Five decades of gratitude: A meta‐synthesis of acknowledgments research," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 68(12), pages 2821-2833, December.
    19. Maryono, Maryono & Killoes, Aditya Marendra & Adhikari, Rajendra & Abdul Aziz, Ammar, 2024. "Agriculture development through multi-stakeholder partnerships in developing countries: A systematic literature review," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    20. Alene Sze Jing Yong & Yi Heng Lim & Mark Wing Loong Cheong & Ednin Hamzah & Siew Li Teoh, 2022. "Willingness-to-pay for cancer treatment and outcome: a systematic review," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 23(6), pages 1037-1057, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:vision:v:28:y:2024:i:2:p:157-170. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.