IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/vision/v20y2016i4p323-330.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Employability Models for Consistency in Quality of Hiring Decisions: A Context of MBA Graduates

Author

Listed:
  • Prem Vrat
  • Sunaina Sangwan

Abstract

This article presents a model for hiring of MBA graduates based on the principle of ‘Bowman’s management coefficient’ model. Concepts of employability and an employability model developed by Vrat are compared with the regression model proposed and a modified model is proposed to calibrate the employability levels of candidates in hiring decisions. Based on the data from five hiring managers on 100 candidates, the erratic nature in hiring decisions based on the intuitive judgement of managers is demonstrated. Using their own judgement, a more consistent regression model developed improves the quality of hiring management graduates. The model proposed is easy to implement and can remove erratic component in hiring decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Prem Vrat & Sunaina Sangwan, 2016. "Employability Models for Consistency in Quality of Hiring Decisions: A Context of MBA Graduates," Vision, , vol. 20(4), pages 323-330, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:vision:v:20:y:2016:i:4:p:323-330
    DOI: 10.1177/0972262916668746
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0972262916668746
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0972262916668746?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. William Edward Remus, 1978. "Testing Bowman's Managerial Coefficient Theory Using a Competitive Gaming Environment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(8), pages 827-835, April.
    2. E. H. Bowman, 1963. "Consistency and Optimality in Managerial Decision Making," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 9(2), pages 310-321, January.
    3. Howard Kunreuther, 1969. "Extensions of Bowman's Theory on Managerial Decision-Making," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(8), pages 415-439, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yael Karlinsky-Shichor & Oded Netzer, 2024. "Automating the B2B Salesperson Pricing Decisions: A Human-Machine Hybrid Approach," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(1), pages 138-157, January.
    2. Sterman, John, 1987. "Modeling managerial behavior--misperceptions of feedback in a dynamic decisionmaking experiment," Working papers 1933-87., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    3. Marvin D. Troutt & Wan-Kai Pang & Shui-Hung Hou, 2006. "Behavioral Estimation of Mathematical Programming Objective Function Coefficients," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(3), pages 422-434, March.
    4. Bruce Kogut & Nalin Kulatilaka, 2001. "Capabilities as Real Options," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(6), pages 744-758, December.
    5. Gatignon, Aline & Gatignon, Hubert, 2010. "Erin Anderson and the Path Breaking Work of TCE in New Areas of Business Research: Transaction Costs in Action," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 86(3), pages 232-247.
    6. Jaksic, Marko & Rusjan, Borut, 2008. "The effect of replenishment policies on the bullwhip effect: A transfer function approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 184(3), pages 946-961, February.
    7. Mirko Kremer & Enno Siemsen & Douglas J. Thomas, 2016. "The Sum and Its Parts: Judgmental Hierarchical Forecasting," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(9), pages 2745-2764, September.
    8. Ujwal Kayande & Arnaud De Bruyn & Gary L. Lilien & Arvind Rangaswamy & Gerrit H. van Bruggen, 2009. "How Incorporating Feedback Mechanisms in a DSS Affects DSS Evaluations," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 527-546, December.
    9. O’Dhaniel A Mullette-Gillman & Ruth L F Leong & Yoanna A Kurnianingsih, 2015. "Cognitive Fatigue Destabilizes Economic Decision Making Preferences and Strategies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-19, July.
    10. Marshall Fisher, 2007. "Strengthening the Empirical Base of Operations Management," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 9(4), pages 368-382, December.
    11. Joseph Lampel & Zur Shapira, 2001. "Judgmental Errors, Interactive Norms, and the Difficulty of Detecting Strategic Surprises," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(5), pages 599-611, October.
    12. Maria R. Ibanez & Jonathan R. Clark & Robert S. Huckman & Bradley R. Staats, 2018. "Discretionary Task Ordering: Queue Management in Radiological Services," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(9), pages 4389-4407, September.
    13. Zhengliang Xue & Zizhuo Wang & Markus Ettl, 2016. "Pricing Personalized Bundles: A New Approach and An Empirical Study," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 18(1), pages 51-68, February.
    14. Karel H. van Donselaar & Vishal Gaur & Tom van Woensel & Rob A. C. M. Broekmeulen & Jan C. Fransoo, 2010. "Ordering Behavior in Retail Stores and Implications for Automated Replenishment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(5), pages 766-784, May.
    15. Wedad Elmaghraby & Wolfgang Jank & Shu Zhang & Itir Z. Karaesmen, 2015. "Sales Force Behavior, Pricing Information, and Pricing Decisions," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 17(4), pages 495-510, October.
    16. Ercan Özen, 2019. "The Concept of Trust in Socio-Economic Life," European Journal of Marketing and Economics Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 2, ejme_v2_i.
    17. Shih-Pin Chen & Wen-Lung Huang, 2014. "Solving Fuzzy Multiproduct Aggregate Production Planning Problems Based on Extension Principle," International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences, Hindawi, vol. 2014, pages 1-18, August.
    18. Diwas S. KC & Bradley R. Staats & Maryam Kouchaki & Francesca Gino, 2020. "Task Selection and Workload: A Focus on Completing Easy Tasks Hurts Performance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(10), pages 4397-4416, October.
    19. John Foreman & Jérémie Gallien & Julie Alspaugh & Fernando Lopez & Rohit Bhatnagar & Chee Chong Teo & Charles Dubois, 2010. "Implementing Supply-Routing Optimization in a Make-to-Order Manufacturing Network," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 12(4), pages 547-568, August.
    20. Thomas Hutzschenreuter & S. Alexander Borchers & Philippa‐Luisa Harhoff, 2021. "Competitors matter: How competitors' actions moderate the influence of firm profitability on the prioritization between growth and efficiency increase," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(2), pages 326-342, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:vision:v:20:y:2016:i:4:p:323-330. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.